Studio Clay vs Stucco
Studio Clay (Behr) and Stucco (Sherwin-Williams) come from different manufacturers. Both sit in the beige family, which is useful context if you're narrowing within a single hue direction. Their light reflectance values are nearly the same — 61 vs 63 — so neither will read significantly brighter or darker than the other. Where Studio Clay leans red, Stucco reads warm — a distinction that shifts noticeably depending on the light source and surrounding finishes. A ΔE of 1.2 puts them in subtle territory — distinguishable in direct comparison, less so from across a room. Below, 5 simulated room previews show how each color reads at scale — real-room photos will be added as they become available.
Color Details
Studio Clay vs Stucco Simulated Comparison
5 simulated room previews — drag the slider on each to see Studio Clay on one side and Stucco on the other.
Digital color is approximate. These simulations are generated from the manufacturer's hex values and overlaid on grayscale room photos — your screen's calibration, brightness, and viewing angle all affect how they render. Before committing to either color, test physical samples in your own space under the light you actually live with.
More Studio Clay comparisons
See how Studio Clay stacks up against other well-photographed colors across different brands and tones.
White Dove reflects far more light (LRV 83 vs 61), opening up a space where Studio Clay encloses it.
A 8-point LRV gap (69 vs 61) makes Ammonite the marginally brighter of the two.
Studio Clay reflects far more light (LRV 61 vs 6), opening up a space where Iron Ore encloses it.
A 9-point LRV gap (61 vs 52) makes Studio Clay the marginally brighter of the two.
At LRV 61 vs 30, Studio Clay is decisively the brighter choice.
Studio Clay reads slightly lighter (LRV 61 vs 52), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms.
Their light reflectance is nearly identical (LRV 61 vs 60), so neither reads brighter in a room.
Studio Clay reads slightly lighter (LRV 61 vs 58), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms.
Studio Clay reflects far more light (LRV 61 vs 27), opening up a space where Denim Drift encloses it.
At LRV 61 vs 43, Studio Clay is decisively the brighter choice.
At LRV 61 vs 4, Studio Clay is decisively the brighter choice.
Studio Clay reads slightly lighter (LRV 61 vs 55), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms.
Studio Clay reflects far more light (LRV 61 vs 13), opening up a space where Bancha encloses it.
Studio Clay reflects far more light (LRV 61 vs 44), opening up a space where Hardwick White encloses it.
At LRV 84 vs 61, Pure White is decisively the brighter choice.
At LRV 61 vs 21, Studio Clay is decisively the brighter choice.
Balboa Mist reads slightly lighter (LRV 66 vs 61), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms.
Shoji White reflects far more light (LRV 74 vs 61), opening up a space where Studio Clay encloses it.
Snowbound reflects far more light (LRV 83 vs 61), opening up a space where Studio Clay encloses it.
Studio Clay reflects far more light (LRV 61 vs 12), opening up a space where Pewter Green encloses it.
Skimming Stone reads slightly lighter (LRV 68 vs 61), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms.
At LRV 61 vs 41, Studio Clay is decisively the brighter choice.
A 6-point LRV gap (68 vs 61) makes Calamine the marginally brighter of the two.
At LRV 61 vs 25, Studio Clay is decisively the brighter choice.
Studio Clay reflects far more light (LRV 61 vs 12), opening up a space where Vintage Vogue encloses it.
Studio Clay reflects far more light (LRV 61 vs 45), opening up a space where Saybrook Sage encloses it.
At LRV 61 vs 31, Studio Clay is decisively the brighter choice.
At LRV 61 vs 7, Studio Clay is decisively the brighter choice.
At LRV 61 vs 24, Studio Clay is decisively the brighter choice.
A 4-point LRV gap (61 vs 57) makes Studio Clay the marginally brighter of the two.