Cascabel Chile vs Jack Pine
Both from Benjamin Moore's palette. Cascabel Chile reads as pink, while Jack Pine reads as green-grey — two distinct hue families, not close cousins. Jack Pine (LRV 16) reflects noticeably more light than Cascabel Chile (LRV 8), a difference of 8 points that becomes especially apparent in rooms with limited natural light. Cascabel Chile runs red while Jack Pine is decidedly green, which means they'll respond very differently to warm vs cool light sources. With a ΔE of 35.4, the contrast is hard to miss. These aren't variations on a theme — they're two different answers to the same question. Below, 5 simulated room previews show how each color reads at scale — real-room photos will be added as they become available.
Color Details
Cascabel Chile vs Jack Pine Simulated Comparison
5 simulated room previews — drag the slider on each to see Cascabel Chile on one side and Jack Pine on the other.
Digital color is approximate. These simulations are generated from the manufacturer's hex values and overlaid on grayscale room photos — your screen's calibration, brightness, and viewing angle all affect how they render. Before committing to either color, test physical samples in your own space under the light you actually live with.
More Cascabel Chile comparisons
See how Cascabel Chile stacks up against other well-photographed colors across different brands and tones.
At LRV 83 vs 8, White Dove is decisively the brighter choice.
Ammonite reflects far more light (LRV 69 vs 8), opening up a space where Cascabel Chile encloses it.
Their light reflectance is nearly identical (LRV 8 vs 6), so neither reads brighter in a room.
Purbeck Stone reflects far more light (LRV 52 vs 8), opening up a space where Cascabel Chile encloses it.
Evergreen Fog reflects far more light (LRV 30 vs 8), opening up a space where Cascabel Chile encloses it.
At LRV 52 vs 8, Mizzle is decisively the brighter choice.
Agreeable Gray reflects far more light (LRV 60 vs 8), opening up a space where Cascabel Chile encloses it.
At LRV 58 vs 8, Accessible Beige is decisively the brighter choice.
At LRV 27 vs 8, Denim Drift is decisively the brighter choice.
French Gray reflects far more light (LRV 43 vs 8), opening up a space where Cascabel Chile encloses it.
Cascabel Chile reads slightly lighter (LRV 8 vs 4), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms.
At LRV 55 vs 8, Tranquil Dawn is decisively the brighter choice.
A 5-point LRV gap (13 vs 8) makes Bancha the marginally brighter of the two.
At LRV 44 vs 8, Hardwick White is decisively the brighter choice.
Pure White reflects far more light (LRV 84 vs 8), opening up a space where Cascabel Chile encloses it.
Artichoke reflects far more light (LRV 21 vs 8), opening up a space where Cascabel Chile encloses it.
At LRV 66 vs 8, Balboa Mist is decisively the brighter choice.
At LRV 74 vs 8, Shoji White is decisively the brighter choice.
At LRV 83 vs 8, Snowbound is decisively the brighter choice.
A 4-point LRV gap (12 vs 8) makes Pewter Green the marginally brighter of the two.
At LRV 68 vs 8, Skimming Stone is decisively the brighter choice.
Dix Blue reflects far more light (LRV 41 vs 8), opening up a space where Cascabel Chile encloses it.
Calamine reflects far more light (LRV 68 vs 8), opening up a space where Cascabel Chile encloses it.
Treron reflects far more light (LRV 25 vs 8), opening up a space where Cascabel Chile encloses it.
A 4-point LRV gap (12 vs 8) makes Vintage Vogue the marginally brighter of the two.
At LRV 45 vs 8, Saybrook Sage is decisively the brighter choice.
Pale Green reflects far more light (LRV 31 vs 8), opening up a space where Cascabel Chile encloses it.
With LRVs of 8 and 7, the two reflect almost the same amount of light.
Cement grey reflects far more light (LRV 24 vs 8), opening up a space where Cascabel Chile encloses it.
Guilford Green reflects far more light (LRV 57 vs 8), opening up a space where Cascabel Chile encloses it.