RAL 130-M vs Iron Ore
RAL 130-M is a RAL Effect color while Iron Ore comes from Sherwin-Williams. RAL 130-M reads as greige-grey, while Iron Ore reads as grey — two distinct hue families, not close cousins. At LRV 39 vs 6, RAL 130-M will read as the brighter of the two — a 34-point gap that matters most in north-facing or low-light rooms. At ΔE 43.1, these are genuinely distinct colors — a strong contrast if used together, or a meaningful choice between two different directions. Below you'll find 4 real-room photo comparisons where both colors appear side by side, plus 5 simulated room previews.
RAL 130-M vs Iron Ore in Real Spaces
4 real rooms side by side. Seeing RAL 130-M and Iron Ore in actual rooms makes the difference concrete; browse the spaces below to get a feel for how each color lives on a wall.
Bedroom
Bedroom walls are often seen under warm artificial light, a context that shifts both colors from how they look on a chip. The LRV gap is large enough that RAL 130-M will make the room feel meaningfully brighter than Iron Ore would.
Kitchen
Kitchen lighting tends to be bright and directional, which sharpens contrast and makes undertone differences more apparent. The LRV gap is large enough that RAL 130-M will make the room feel meaningfully brighter than Iron Ore would.
Bathroom
Bathrooms amplify color — the enclosed space and reflective surfaces make what reads subtle elsewhere feel more present here. The LRV gap is large enough that RAL 130-M will make the room feel meaningfully brighter than Iron Ore would.
Color Details
RAL 130-M vs Iron Ore Simulated Comparison
5 simulated room previews — drag the slider on each to see RAL 130-M on one side and Iron Ore on the other.
Digital color is approximate. These simulations are generated from the manufacturer's hex values and overlaid on grayscale room photos — your screen's calibration, brightness, and viewing angle all affect how they render. Before committing to either color, test physical samples in your own space under the light you actually live with.
More RAL 130-M comparisons
See how RAL 130-M stacks up against other well-photographed colors across different brands and tones.
White Dove reflects far more light (LRV 83 vs 39), opening up a space where RAL 130-M encloses it.
At LRV 52 vs 39, Purbeck Stone is decisively the brighter choice.
A 9-point LRV gap (39 vs 30) makes RAL 130-M the marginally brighter of the two.
At LRV 60 vs 39, Agreeable Gray is decisively the brighter choice.
Accessible Beige reflects far more light (LRV 58 vs 39), opening up a space where RAL 130-M encloses it.
RAL 130-M reflects far more light (LRV 39 vs 27), opening up a space where Denim Drift encloses it.
A 4-point LRV gap (43 vs 39) makes French Gray the marginally brighter of the two.
Tranquil Dawn reflects far more light (LRV 55 vs 39), opening up a space where RAL 130-M encloses it.
Hardwick White reads slightly lighter (LRV 44 vs 39), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms.
At LRV 84 vs 39, Pure White is decisively the brighter choice.
Balboa Mist reflects far more light (LRV 66 vs 39), opening up a space where RAL 130-M encloses it.
Shoji White reflects far more light (LRV 74 vs 39), opening up a space where RAL 130-M encloses it.
RAL 130-M reflects far more light (LRV 39 vs 12), opening up a space where Pewter Green encloses it.
Skimming Stone reflects far more light (LRV 68 vs 39), opening up a space where RAL 130-M encloses it.
RAL 130-M reflects far more light (LRV 39 vs 12), opening up a space where Vintage Vogue encloses it.
Saybrook Sage reads slightly lighter (LRV 45 vs 39), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms.
A 8-point LRV gap (39 vs 31) makes RAL 130-M the marginally brighter of the two.
At LRV 39 vs 7, RAL 130-M is decisively the brighter choice.
At LRV 39 vs 24, RAL 130-M is decisively the brighter choice.
At LRV 57 vs 39, Guilford Green is decisively the brighter choice.
At LRV 72 vs 39, Just Walnut is decisively the brighter choice.