RAL 140-6 vs Aristocrat Peach
RAL 140-6 (RAL Effect) and Aristocrat Peach (Sherwin-Williams) come from different manufacturers. Both sit in the beige family, which is useful context if you're narrowing within a single hue direction. Their light reflectance values are nearly the same — 66 vs 65 — so neither will read significantly brighter or darker than the other. ΔE 5.5 means they're clearly different, but not dramatically so — they'd pair well in the same room. Below you'll find 4 real-room photo comparisons where both colors appear side by side, plus 5 simulated room previews.
RAL 140-6 vs Aristocrat Peach in Real Spaces
4 real rooms side by side. RAL 140-6 and Aristocrat Peach are close enough that the difference can be hard to judge from a chip alone — these photos show how each reads at scale, across different spaces and lighting conditions.
Living Room
A living room wall sees more varied light than almost any other surface in the house, which makes the choice between these two more nuanced than a chip suggests. The distinction reads clearly at room scale, making the choice between them concrete.
Bedroom
Bedrooms are typically lit with warmer, lower light than the rest of the house — a condition that flatters warm tones and deepens cool ones. At this scale, the choice between them becomes clear in a way that a swatch alone can't communicate.
Bathroom
Small bathrooms intensify color. A shade that seems quiet in a larger room can feel immersive when you're surrounded by it on four walls. At this scale, the choice between them becomes clear in a way that a swatch alone can't communicate.
House
A full exterior is the most demanding test for a paint color — scale and outdoor light both amplify differences that seem small on a swatch. At this scale, the choice between them becomes clear in a way that a swatch alone can't communicate.
Color Details
RAL 140-6 vs Aristocrat Peach Simulated Comparison
5 simulated room previews — drag the slider on each to see RAL 140-6 on one side and Aristocrat Peach on the other.
Digital color is approximate. These simulations are generated from the manufacturer's hex values and overlaid on grayscale room photos — your screen's calibration, brightness, and viewing angle all affect how they render. Before committing to either color, test physical samples in your own space under the light you actually live with.
More RAL 140-6 comparisons
See how RAL 140-6 stacks up against other well-photographed colors across different brands and tones.
White Dove reflects far more light (LRV 83 vs 66), opening up a space where RAL 140-6 encloses it.
At LRV 66 vs 52, RAL 140-6 is decisively the brighter choice.
At LRV 66 vs 30, RAL 140-6 is decisively the brighter choice.
A 6-point LRV gap (66 vs 60) makes RAL 140-6 the marginally brighter of the two.
RAL 140-6 reads slightly lighter (LRV 66 vs 58), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms.
RAL 140-6 reflects far more light (LRV 66 vs 27), opening up a space where Denim Drift encloses it.
At LRV 66 vs 43, RAL 140-6 is decisively the brighter choice.
RAL 140-6 reads slightly lighter (LRV 66 vs 55), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms.
RAL 140-6 reflects far more light (LRV 66 vs 44), opening up a space where Hardwick White encloses it.
At LRV 84 vs 66, Pure White is decisively the brighter choice.
With LRVs of 66 and 66, the two reflect almost the same amount of light.
Shoji White reads slightly lighter (LRV 74 vs 66), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms.
RAL 140-6 reflects far more light (LRV 66 vs 12), opening up a space where Pewter Green encloses it.
With LRVs of 68 and 66, the two reflect almost the same amount of light.
RAL 140-6 reflects far more light (LRV 66 vs 12), opening up a space where Vintage Vogue encloses it.
RAL 140-6 reflects far more light (LRV 66 vs 45), opening up a space where Saybrook Sage encloses it.
At LRV 66 vs 31, RAL 140-6 is decisively the brighter choice.
At LRV 66 vs 7, RAL 140-6 is decisively the brighter choice.
At LRV 66 vs 24, RAL 140-6 is decisively the brighter choice.
A 9-point LRV gap (66 vs 57) makes RAL 140-6 the marginally brighter of the two.