RAL 160-1 vs Shoji White
RAL 160-1 is a RAL Effect color while Shoji White comes from Sherwin-Williams. RAL 160-1 reads as blue-purple, while Shoji White reads as beige-greige — two distinct hue families, not close cousins. With LRVs of 77 and 74, they'll behave almost identically in terms of how much light they reflect back into a room. At ΔE 12.1, these are genuinely distinct colors — a strong contrast if used together, or a meaningful choice between two different directions. Below you'll find 4 real-room photo comparisons where both colors appear side by side, plus 5 simulated room previews.
RAL 160-1 vs Shoji White in Real Spaces
4 real rooms side by side. Seeing RAL 160-1 and Shoji White in actual rooms makes the difference concrete; browse the spaces below to get a feel for how each color lives on a wall.
Bedroom
Bedroom walls are often seen under warm artificial light, a context that shifts both colors from how they look on a chip. Side by side like this, the difference is easy to read — which is exactly why seeing them in a real space is more useful than comparing chips.
Kitchen
Kitchen lighting tends to be bright and directional, which sharpens contrast and makes undertone differences more apparent. Side by side like this, the difference is easy to read — which is exactly why seeing them in a real space is more useful than comparing chips.
Bathroom
Bathrooms amplify color — the enclosed space and reflective surfaces make what reads subtle elsewhere feel more present here. Side by side like this, the difference is easy to read — which is exactly why seeing them in a real space is more useful than comparing chips.
House
At full exterior scale, the difference between these two colors becomes much easier to judge than from a small chip. Side by side like this, the difference is easy to read — which is exactly why seeing them in a real space is more useful than comparing chips.
Color Details
RAL 160-1 vs Shoji White Simulated Comparison
5 simulated room previews — drag the slider on each to see RAL 160-1 on one side and Shoji White on the other.
Digital color is approximate. These simulations are generated from the manufacturer's hex values and overlaid on grayscale room photos — your screen's calibration, brightness, and viewing angle all affect how they render. Before committing to either color, test physical samples in your own space under the light you actually live with.
More RAL 160-1 comparisons
See how RAL 160-1 stacks up against other well-photographed colors across different brands and tones.
A 7-point LRV gap (83 vs 77) makes White Dove the marginally brighter of the two.
RAL 160-1 reflects far more light (LRV 77 vs 52), opening up a space where Purbeck Stone encloses it.
RAL 160-1 reflects far more light (LRV 77 vs 30), opening up a space where Evergreen Fog encloses it.
RAL 160-1 reflects far more light (LRV 77 vs 60), opening up a space where Agreeable Gray encloses it.
At LRV 77 vs 58, RAL 160-1 is decisively the brighter choice.
At LRV 77 vs 27, RAL 160-1 is decisively the brighter choice.
RAL 160-1 reflects far more light (LRV 77 vs 43), opening up a space where French Gray encloses it.
At LRV 77 vs 55, RAL 160-1 is decisively the brighter choice.
At LRV 77 vs 44, RAL 160-1 is decisively the brighter choice.
Pure White reads slightly lighter (LRV 84 vs 77), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms.
A 11-point LRV gap (77 vs 66) makes RAL 160-1 the marginally brighter of the two.
At LRV 77 vs 12, RAL 160-1 is decisively the brighter choice.
At LRV 77 vs 8, RAL 160-1 is decisively the brighter choice.
A 8-point LRV gap (77 vs 68) makes RAL 160-1 the marginally brighter of the two.
At LRV 77 vs 12, RAL 160-1 is decisively the brighter choice.
At LRV 77 vs 45, RAL 160-1 is decisively the brighter choice.
RAL 160-1 reflects far more light (LRV 77 vs 31), opening up a space where Pale Green encloses it.
RAL 160-1 reflects far more light (LRV 77 vs 7), opening up a space where Pine Needle encloses it.