RAL 160-3 vs Whimsical White
RAL 160-3 (RAL Effect) and Whimsical White (Sherwin-Williams) come from different manufacturers. These are both whites, so the question isn't which hue to choose — it's where within white to land. Their light reflectance values are nearly the same — 82 vs 79 — so neither will read significantly brighter or darker than the other. A ΔE of 1.4 puts them in subtle territory — distinguishable in direct comparison, less so from across a room. Below, 5 simulated room previews show how each color reads at scale — real-room photos will be added as they become available.
Color Details
RAL 160-3 vs Whimsical White Simulated Comparison
5 simulated room previews — drag the slider on each to see RAL 160-3 on one side and Whimsical White on the other.
Digital color is approximate. These simulations are generated from the manufacturer's hex values and overlaid on grayscale room photos — your screen's calibration, brightness, and viewing angle all affect how they render. Before committing to either color, test physical samples in your own space under the light you actually live with.
More RAL 160-3 comparisons
See how RAL 160-3 stacks up against other well-photographed colors across different brands and tones.
