RAL 210-5 vs Green Trance
RAL 210-5 (RAL Effect) and Green Trance (Sherwin-Williams) come from different manufacturers. Both sit in the green family, which is useful context if you're narrowing within a single hue direction. Their light reflectance values are nearly the same — 76 vs 75 — so neither will read significantly brighter or darker than the other. A ΔE of 1.7 puts them in subtle territory — distinguishable in direct comparison, less so from across a room. Below you'll find 1 real-room photo comparison where both colors appear side by side, plus 5 simulated room previews.
RAL 210-5 vs Green Trance in Real Spaces
1 real room side by side. RAL 210-5 and Green Trance are close enough that the difference can be hard to judge from a chip alone — these photos show how each reads at scale, across different spaces and lighting conditions.
Bedroom
Bedrooms are typically lit with warmer, lower light than the rest of the house — a condition that flatters warm tones and deepens cool ones. In photos like these you're seeing the difference at its most direct. In a finished room, the distinction is there but not dramatic.
Color Details
RAL 210-5 vs Green Trance Simulated Comparison
5 simulated room previews — drag the slider on each to see RAL 210-5 on one side and Green Trance on the other.
Digital color is approximate. These simulations are generated from the manufacturer's hex values and overlaid on grayscale room photos — your screen's calibration, brightness, and viewing angle all affect how they render. Before committing to either color, test physical samples in your own space under the light you actually live with.
More RAL 210-5 comparisons
See how RAL 210-5 stacks up against other well-photographed colors across different brands and tones.
A 7-point LRV gap (83 vs 76) makes White Dove the marginally brighter of the two.
RAL 210-5 reflects far more light (LRV 76 vs 52), opening up a space where Purbeck Stone encloses it.
RAL 210-5 reflects far more light (LRV 76 vs 30), opening up a space where Evergreen Fog encloses it.
RAL 210-5 reflects far more light (LRV 76 vs 60), opening up a space where Agreeable Gray encloses it.
At LRV 76 vs 58, RAL 210-5 is decisively the brighter choice.
At LRV 76 vs 27, RAL 210-5 is decisively the brighter choice.
RAL 210-5 reflects far more light (LRV 76 vs 43), opening up a space where French Gray encloses it.
At LRV 76 vs 55, RAL 210-5 is decisively the brighter choice.
At LRV 76 vs 44, RAL 210-5 is decisively the brighter choice.
Pure White reads slightly lighter (LRV 84 vs 76), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms.
A 11-point LRV gap (76 vs 66) makes RAL 210-5 the marginally brighter of the two.
Their light reflectance is nearly identical (LRV 76 vs 74), so neither reads brighter in a room.
At LRV 76 vs 12, RAL 210-5 is decisively the brighter choice.
At LRV 76 vs 8, RAL 210-5 is decisively the brighter choice.
A 8-point LRV gap (76 vs 68) makes RAL 210-5 the marginally brighter of the two.
At LRV 76 vs 12, RAL 210-5 is decisively the brighter choice.
At LRV 76 vs 45, RAL 210-5 is decisively the brighter choice.
RAL 210-5 reflects far more light (LRV 76 vs 31), opening up a space where Pale Green encloses it.