RAL 210-M vs Evergreen Fog
RAL 210-M is a RAL Effect color while Evergreen Fog comes from Sherwin-Williams. RAL 210-M reads as grey, while Evergreen Fog reads as green-grey — two distinct hue families, not close cousins. At LRV 38 vs 30, RAL 210-M will read as the brighter of the two — a 8-point gap that matters most in north-facing or low-light rooms. At ΔE 6.7, the difference is perceptible but not dramatic — the two can work harmoniously in the same space. Below you'll find 3 real-room photo comparisons where both colors appear side by side, plus 5 simulated room previews.
RAL 210-M vs Evergreen Fog in Real Spaces
3 real rooms side by side. RAL 210-M and Evergreen Fog are close enough that the difference can be hard to judge from a chip alone — these photos show how each reads at scale, across different spaces and lighting conditions.
Living Room
Living rooms test a color across a full range of conditions — morning sun, afternoon shade, and evening lamp light all shift how both of these read. RAL 210-M has the edge in reflectance, which shows as a quiet sense of added space rather than an obvious contrast.
Bathroom
Bathrooms amplify color — the enclosed space and reflective surfaces make what reads subtle elsewhere feel more present here. The brightness difference is modest but present — RAL 210-M gives the walls a little more lift.
Kitchen Cabinets
On cabinetry, undertone and temperature become more pronounced against countertops and hardware. The brightness difference is modest but present — RAL 210-M gives the walls a little more lift.
Color Details
RAL 210-M vs Evergreen Fog Simulated Comparison
5 simulated room previews — drag the slider on each to see RAL 210-M on one side and Evergreen Fog on the other.
Digital color is approximate. These simulations are generated from the manufacturer's hex values and overlaid on grayscale room photos — your screen's calibration, brightness, and viewing angle all affect how they render. Before committing to either color, test physical samples in your own space under the light you actually live with.
More RAL 210-M comparisons
See how RAL 210-M stacks up against other well-photographed colors across different brands and tones.
At LRV 83 vs 38, White Dove is decisively the brighter choice.
Purbeck Stone reflects far more light (LRV 52 vs 38), opening up a space where RAL 210-M encloses it.
Agreeable Gray reflects far more light (LRV 60 vs 38), opening up a space where RAL 210-M encloses it.
At LRV 58 vs 38, Accessible Beige is decisively the brighter choice.
A 11-point LRV gap (38 vs 27) makes RAL 210-M the marginally brighter of the two.
French Gray reads slightly lighter (LRV 43 vs 38), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms.
At LRV 55 vs 38, Tranquil Dawn is decisively the brighter choice.
A 5-point LRV gap (44 vs 38) makes Hardwick White the marginally brighter of the two.
Pure White reflects far more light (LRV 84 vs 38), opening up a space where RAL 210-M encloses it.
At LRV 66 vs 38, Balboa Mist is decisively the brighter choice.
At LRV 74 vs 38, Shoji White is decisively the brighter choice.
At LRV 38 vs 12, RAL 210-M is decisively the brighter choice.
At LRV 68 vs 38, Skimming Stone is decisively the brighter choice.
At LRV 38 vs 12, RAL 210-M is decisively the brighter choice.
A 7-point LRV gap (45 vs 38) makes Saybrook Sage the marginally brighter of the two.
RAL 210-M reads slightly lighter (LRV 38 vs 31), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms.
RAL 210-M reflects far more light (LRV 38 vs 7), opening up a space where Pine Needle encloses it.
RAL 210-M reflects far more light (LRV 38 vs 24), opening up a space where Cement grey encloses it.
Guilford Green reflects far more light (LRV 57 vs 38), opening up a space where RAL 210-M encloses it.
Just Walnut reflects far more light (LRV 72 vs 38), opening up a space where RAL 210-M encloses it.