RAL 670-2 vs Bluebell
Where RAL 670-2 belongs to RAL Effect's range, Bluebell is a Sherwin-Williams color. These are both blues, so the question isn't which hue to choose — it's where within blue to land. Bluebell (LRV 61) reflects noticeably more light than RAL 670-2 (LRV 58), a difference of 3 points that becomes especially apparent in rooms with limited natural light. The ΔE 4.7 gap is real but not dramatic — close enough to use together, distinct enough to matter as a choice. Below you'll find 1 real-room photo comparison where both colors appear side by side, plus 5 simulated room previews.
RAL 670-2 vs Bluebell in Real Spaces
1 real room side by side. RAL 670-2 and Bluebell are close enough that the difference can be hard to judge from a chip alone — these photos show how each reads at scale, across different spaces and lighting conditions.
Color Details
RAL 670-2 vs Bluebell Simulated Comparison
5 simulated room previews — drag the slider on each to see RAL 670-2 on one side and Bluebell on the other.
Digital color is approximate. These simulations are generated from the manufacturer's hex values and overlaid on grayscale room photos — your screen's calibration, brightness, and viewing angle all affect how they render. Before committing to either color, test physical samples in your own space under the light you actually live with.
More RAL 670-2 comparisons
See how RAL 670-2 stacks up against other well-photographed colors across different brands and tones.
White Dove reflects far more light (LRV 83 vs 58), opening up a space where RAL 670-2 encloses it.
A 6-point LRV gap (58 vs 52) makes RAL 670-2 the marginally brighter of the two.
At LRV 58 vs 30, RAL 670-2 is decisively the brighter choice.
Their light reflectance is nearly identical (LRV 60 vs 58), so neither reads brighter in a room.
With LRVs of 58 and 58, the two reflect almost the same amount of light.
RAL 670-2 reflects far more light (LRV 58 vs 27), opening up a space where Denim Drift encloses it.
At LRV 58 vs 43, RAL 670-2 is decisively the brighter choice.
With LRVs of 58 and 55, the two reflect almost the same amount of light.
RAL 670-2 reflects far more light (LRV 58 vs 44), opening up a space where Hardwick White encloses it.
At LRV 84 vs 58, Pure White is decisively the brighter choice.
Balboa Mist reads slightly lighter (LRV 66 vs 58), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms.
Shoji White reflects far more light (LRV 74 vs 58), opening up a space where RAL 670-2 encloses it.
RAL 670-2 reflects far more light (LRV 58 vs 12), opening up a space where Pewter Green encloses it.
RAL 670-2 reflects far more light (LRV 58 vs 8), opening up a space where Duck Green encloses it.
Skimming Stone reads slightly lighter (LRV 68 vs 58), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms.
RAL 670-2 reflects far more light (LRV 58 vs 12), opening up a space where Vintage Vogue encloses it.
RAL 670-2 reflects far more light (LRV 58 vs 45), opening up a space where Saybrook Sage encloses it.
At LRV 58 vs 31, RAL 670-2 is decisively the brighter choice.
At LRV 58 vs 7, RAL 670-2 is decisively the brighter choice.
At LRV 58 vs 24, RAL 670-2 is decisively the brighter choice.
Their light reflectance is nearly identical (LRV 58 vs 57), so neither reads brighter in a room.