RAL 860-2 vs Misty
RAL 860-2 (RAL Effect) and Misty (Sherwin-Williams) come from different manufacturers. These are both blue-greys, so the question isn't which hue to choose — it's where within blue-grey to land. Their light reflectance values are nearly the same — 64 vs 64 — so neither will read significantly brighter or darker than the other. A ΔE of 1.8 puts them in subtle territory — distinguishable in direct comparison, less so from across a room. Below you'll find 2 real-room photo comparisons where both colors appear side by side, plus 5 simulated room previews.
RAL 860-2 vs Misty in Real Spaces
2 real rooms side by side. RAL 860-2 and Misty are close enough that the difference can be hard to judge from a chip alone — these photos show how each reads at scale, across different spaces and lighting conditions.
Living Room
A living room wall sees more varied light than almost any other surface in the house, which makes the choice between these two more nuanced than a chip suggests. At this scale the difference is subtle — you'd need them side by side, as shown here, to reliably tell them apart.
Bedroom
Bedrooms are typically lit with warmer, lower light than the rest of the house — a condition that flatters warm tones and deepens cool ones. In photos like these you're seeing the difference at its most direct. In a finished room, the distinction is there but not dramatic.
Color Details
RAL 860-2 vs Misty Simulated Comparison
5 simulated room previews — drag the slider on each to see RAL 860-2 on one side and Misty on the other.
Digital color is approximate. These simulations are generated from the manufacturer's hex values and overlaid on grayscale room photos — your screen's calibration, brightness, and viewing angle all affect how they render. Before committing to either color, test physical samples in your own space under the light you actually live with.
More RAL 860-2 comparisons
See how RAL 860-2 stacks up against other well-photographed colors across different brands and tones.
At LRV 83 vs 64, White Dove is decisively the brighter choice.
RAL 860-2 reflects far more light (LRV 64 vs 52), opening up a space where Purbeck Stone encloses it.
RAL 860-2 reflects far more light (LRV 64 vs 30), opening up a space where Evergreen Fog encloses it.
RAL 860-2 reads slightly lighter (LRV 64 vs 60), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms.
A 6-point LRV gap (64 vs 58) makes RAL 860-2 the marginally brighter of the two.
At LRV 64 vs 27, RAL 860-2 is decisively the brighter choice.
RAL 860-2 reflects far more light (LRV 64 vs 43), opening up a space where French Gray encloses it.
A 9-point LRV gap (64 vs 55) makes RAL 860-2 the marginally brighter of the two.
At LRV 64 vs 44, RAL 860-2 is decisively the brighter choice.
Pure White reflects far more light (LRV 84 vs 64), opening up a space where RAL 860-2 encloses it.
Their light reflectance is nearly identical (LRV 66 vs 64), so neither reads brighter in a room.
A 10-point LRV gap (74 vs 64) makes Shoji White the marginally brighter of the two.
At LRV 64 vs 12, RAL 860-2 is decisively the brighter choice.
At LRV 64 vs 8, RAL 860-2 is decisively the brighter choice.
A 4-point LRV gap (68 vs 64) makes Skimming Stone the marginally brighter of the two.
At LRV 64 vs 12, RAL 860-2 is decisively the brighter choice.
At LRV 64 vs 45, RAL 860-2 is decisively the brighter choice.
RAL 860-2 reflects far more light (LRV 64 vs 31), opening up a space where Pale Green encloses it.