Dirty Martini vs Rice Paddy
Both from Sherwin-Williams's palette. Hue-wise, Dirty Martini belongs to the beige family and Rice Paddy to the beige-yellow family. They have nearly identical light reflectance values (64 vs 66), so they'll read as similarly Light in most lighting conditions. Both lean warm, so they'll behave similarly in mixed or changing light conditions. The ΔE 5.3 gap is real but not dramatic — close enough to use together, distinct enough to matter as a choice. Below, 5 simulated room previews show how each color reads at scale — real-room photos will be added as they become available.
Color Details
Dirty Martini vs Rice Paddy Simulated Comparison
5 simulated room previews — drag the slider on each to see Dirty Martini on one side and Rice Paddy on the other.
Digital color is approximate. These simulations are generated from the manufacturer's hex values and overlaid on grayscale room photos — your screen's calibration, brightness, and viewing angle all affect how they render. Before committing to either color, test physical samples in your own space under the light you actually live with.
More Dirty Martini comparisons
See how Dirty Martini stacks up against other well-photographed colors across different brands and tones.
A 5-point LRV gap (69 vs 64) makes Ammonite the marginally brighter of the two.
White Dove reflects far more light (LRV 83 vs 64), opening up a space where Dirty Martini encloses it.
Dirty Martini reflects far more light (LRV 64 vs 6), opening up a space where Iron Ore encloses it.
At LRV 64 vs 52, Dirty Martini is decisively the brighter choice.
At LRV 64 vs 30, Dirty Martini is decisively the brighter choice.
Dirty Martini reflects far more light (LRV 64 vs 52), opening up a space where Mizzle encloses it.
A 4-point LRV gap (64 vs 60) makes Dirty Martini the marginally brighter of the two.
Dirty Martini reads slightly lighter (LRV 64 vs 58), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms.
Dirty Martini reflects far more light (LRV 64 vs 27), opening up a space where Denim Drift encloses it.
At LRV 64 vs 43, Dirty Martini is decisively the brighter choice.
At LRV 64 vs 4, Dirty Martini is decisively the brighter choice.
Dirty Martini reads slightly lighter (LRV 64 vs 55), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms.
Dirty Martini reflects far more light (LRV 64 vs 13), opening up a space where Bancha encloses it.
Dirty Martini reflects far more light (LRV 64 vs 44), opening up a space where Hardwick White encloses it.
At LRV 84 vs 64, Pure White is decisively the brighter choice.
At LRV 64 vs 21, Dirty Martini is decisively the brighter choice.
With LRVs of 66 and 64, the two reflect almost the same amount of light.
Shoji White reads slightly lighter (LRV 74 vs 64), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms.
Snowbound reflects far more light (LRV 83 vs 64), opening up a space where Dirty Martini encloses it.
At LRV 64 vs 51, Dirty Martini is decisively the brighter choice.
Dirty Martini reflects far more light (LRV 64 vs 12), opening up a space where Pewter Green encloses it.
Dirty Martini reflects far more light (LRV 64 vs 8), opening up a space where Duck Green encloses it.
Skimming Stone reads slightly lighter (LRV 68 vs 64), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms.
At LRV 64 vs 41, Dirty Martini is decisively the brighter choice.
Dirty Martini reflects far more light (LRV 64 vs 12), opening up a space where Vintage Vogue encloses it.
Dirty Martini reflects far more light (LRV 64 vs 45), opening up a space where Saybrook Sage encloses it.
At LRV 64 vs 31, Dirty Martini is decisively the brighter choice.