Eye Catching vs Hyacinth Tint
Both are Sherwin-Williams colors. Eye Catching reads as beige-yellow, while Hyacinth Tint reads as blue — two distinct hue families, not close cousins. At LRV 60 vs 50, Hyacinth Tint will read as the brighter of the two — a 10-point gap that matters most in north-facing or low-light rooms. The tonal difference — Eye Catching's warm character against Hyacinth Tint's cool — becomes most visible against white trim or in morning light. At ΔE 78.6, these are genuinely distinct colors — a strong contrast if used together, or a meaningful choice between two different directions. Below, 5 simulated room previews show how each color reads at scale — real-room photos will be added as they become available.
Color Details
Eye Catching vs Hyacinth Tint Simulated Comparison
5 simulated room previews — drag the slider on each to see Eye Catching on one side and Hyacinth Tint on the other.
Digital color is approximate. These simulations are generated from the manufacturer's hex values and overlaid on grayscale room photos — your screen's calibration, brightness, and viewing angle all affect how they render. Before committing to either color, test physical samples in your own space under the light you actually live with.
More Eye Catching comparisons
See how Eye Catching stacks up against other well-photographed colors across different brands and tones.
At LRV 69 vs 50, Ammonite is decisively the brighter choice.
White Dove reflects far more light (LRV 83 vs 50), opening up a space where Eye Catching encloses it.
Eye Catching reflects far more light (LRV 50 vs 6), opening up a space where Iron Ore encloses it.
Their light reflectance is nearly identical (LRV 52 vs 50), so neither reads brighter in a room.
At LRV 50 vs 30, Eye Catching is decisively the brighter choice.
With LRVs of 52 and 50, the two reflect almost the same amount of light.
A 10-point LRV gap (60 vs 50) makes Agreeable Gray the marginally brighter of the two.
Accessible Beige reads slightly lighter (LRV 58 vs 50), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms.
Eye Catching reflects far more light (LRV 50 vs 27), opening up a space where Denim Drift encloses it.
A 7-point LRV gap (50 vs 43) makes Eye Catching the marginally brighter of the two.
At LRV 50 vs 4, Eye Catching is decisively the brighter choice.
Tranquil Dawn reads slightly lighter (LRV 55 vs 50), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms.
Eye Catching reflects far more light (LRV 50 vs 13), opening up a space where Bancha encloses it.
Eye Catching reads slightly lighter (LRV 50 vs 44), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms.
At LRV 84 vs 50, Pure White is decisively the brighter choice.
At LRV 50 vs 21, Eye Catching is decisively the brighter choice.
Balboa Mist reflects far more light (LRV 66 vs 50), opening up a space where Eye Catching encloses it.
Shoji White reflects far more light (LRV 74 vs 50), opening up a space where Eye Catching encloses it.
Snowbound reflects far more light (LRV 83 vs 50), opening up a space where Eye Catching encloses it.
Their light reflectance is nearly identical (LRV 51 vs 50), so neither reads brighter in a room.
Eye Catching reflects far more light (LRV 50 vs 12), opening up a space where Pewter Green encloses it.
Eye Catching reflects far more light (LRV 50 vs 8), opening up a space where Duck Green encloses it.
Skimming Stone reflects far more light (LRV 68 vs 50), opening up a space where Eye Catching encloses it.
A 9-point LRV gap (50 vs 41) makes Eye Catching the marginally brighter of the two.
Eye Catching reflects far more light (LRV 50 vs 12), opening up a space where Vintage Vogue encloses it.
Eye Catching reads slightly lighter (LRV 50 vs 45), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms.
At LRV 50 vs 31, Eye Catching is decisively the brighter choice.