Match Blushing Brilliance

Benjamin Moore Blushing Brilliance is a light-reflective shade, warm in character with an LRV of 63. The matches below are the closest equivalents available across every brand on Pontata, ranked by ΔE — a perceptual color difference score. A ΔE under 3 is subtle; under 10 is noticeable but harmonious; above 25 means genuinely different colors.

View full Blushing Brilliance color page →
Blushing Brilliance
Benjamin Moore
Blushing Brilliance
009#F8C9C0LRV 63Warm

Closest matches across every brand

One match per brand, ranked by ΔE — a perceptual color difference score calculated from Lab color space values. Lower is closer. Click any card to compare side by side in simulated rooms.

Blushing Brilliance
Blushing Brilliance
Rose Pink
Blushing Brilliance vs Rose Pink
Benjamin Moore
Blushing Brilliance
009 · LRV 63
PPG
Rose Pink
PPG1189-3 · LRV 65

With LRVs of 65 and 63, the two reflect almost the same amount of light. At ΔE 0.8 you'd need them side by side to tell them apart.

Compare ↔ΔE 0.8Imperceptible
Blushing Brilliance
Blushing Brilliance
RAL 490-2
RAL 490-2
Blushing Brilliance vs RAL 490-2
Benjamin Moore
Blushing Brilliance
009 · LRV 63
RAL EffectEffect
RAL 490-2
RAL 490-2 · LRV 68

RAL 490-2 reads slightly lighter (LRV 68 vs 63), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms. At ΔE 1.4 you'd need them side by side to tell them apart.

Compare ↔ΔE 1.4Subtle
Prairie Rose
Blushing Brilliance
Blushing Brilliance
Prairie Rose vs Blushing Brilliance
Behr
Prairie Rose
M170-2 · LRV 65
Benjamin Moore
Blushing Brilliance
009 · LRV 63

With LRVs of 65 and 63, the two reflect almost the same amount of light. At ΔE 2.1 you'd need them side by side to tell them apart.

Compare ↔ΔE 2.1Subtle
August Sunrise
Blushing Brilliance
Blushing Brilliance
August Sunrise vs Blushing Brilliance
Benjamin Moore
August Sunrise
030 · LRV 59
Benjamin Moore
Blushing Brilliance
009 · LRV 63

A 4-point LRV gap (63 vs 59) makes Blushing Brilliance the marginally brighter of the two. The ΔE 3.2 gap is real but not dramatic — distinct as a choice, harmonious together.

Compare ↔ΔE 3.2Noticeable
Blushing Brilliance
Blushing Brilliance
Cloud Number Nine
Cloud Number Nine
Blushing Brilliance vs Cloud Number Nine
Benjamin Moore
Blushing Brilliance
009 · LRV 63
Cloverdale Paint
Cloud Number Nine
1071 · LRV 69

Cloud Number Nine reads slightly lighter (LRV 69 vs 63), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms. At ΔE 3.5 they're clearly different, yet close enough to share a room.

Compare ↔ΔE 3.5Noticeable
Blushing Brilliance
Blushing Brilliance
Oleander
Oleander
Blushing Brilliance vs Oleander
Benjamin Moore
Blushing Brilliance
009 · LRV 63
Sherwin-Williams
Oleander
6603 · LRV 66

Their light reflectance is nearly identical (LRV 66 vs 63), so neither reads brighter in a room. The ΔE 3.8 gap is real but not dramatic — distinct as a choice, harmonious together.

Compare ↔ΔE 3.8Noticeable
Blushing Brilliance
Blushing Brilliance
Magnolia
Magnolia
Blushing Brilliance vs Magnolia
Benjamin Moore
Blushing Brilliance
009 · LRV 63
Tikkurila
Magnolia
H320 · LRV 60

A 3-point LRV gap (63 vs 60) makes Blushing Brilliance the marginally brighter of the two. The ΔE 4.1 gap is real but not dramatic — distinct as a choice, harmonious together.

Compare ↔ΔE 4.1Noticeable
Blushing Brilliance
Blushing Brilliance
Nancy's Blushes
Nancy's Blushes
Blushing Brilliance vs Nancy's Blushes
Benjamin Moore
Blushing Brilliance
009 · LRV 63
Farrow & Ball
Nancy's Blushes
278 · LRV 55

Blushing Brilliance reads slightly lighter (LRV 63 vs 55), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms. At ΔE 7.9 they're clearly different, yet close enough to share a room.

Compare ↔ΔE 7.9Noticeable
Blushing Brilliance
Blushing Brilliance
Pink Nevada 5
Pink Nevada 5
Blushing Brilliance vs Pink Nevada 5
Benjamin Moore
Blushing Brilliance
009 · LRV 63
Dulux
Pink Nevada 5
90RR 62/124 · LRV 62

Their light reflectance is nearly identical (LRV 63 vs 62), so neither reads brighter in a room. The ΔE 8.0 gap is real but not dramatic — distinct as a choice, harmonious together.

Compare ↔ΔE 8.0Noticeable
Blushing Brilliance
Blushing Brilliance
Pink Slip
Pink Slip
Blushing Brilliance vs Pink Slip
Benjamin Moore
Blushing Brilliance
009 · LRV 63
Little Greene
Pink Slip
220 · LRV 68

A 5-point LRV gap (68 vs 63) makes Pink Slip the marginally brighter of the two. The ΔE 8.5 gap is real but not dramatic — distinct as a choice, harmonious together.

Compare ↔ΔE 8.5Noticeable
Blushing Brilliance
Blushing Brilliance
Pocketful of Promise
Pocketful of Promise
Blushing Brilliance vs Pocketful of Promise
Benjamin Moore
Blushing Brilliance
009 · LRV 63
Valspar
Pocketful of Promise
V078-2 · LRV 62

Their light reflectance is nearly identical (LRV 63 vs 62), so neither reads brighter in a room. The ΔE 9.8 gap is real but not dramatic — distinct as a choice, harmonious together.

Compare ↔ΔE 9.8Noticeable
Blushing Brilliance
Blushing Brilliance
Khajal
Khajal
Blushing Brilliance vs Khajal
Benjamin Moore
Blushing Brilliance
009 · LRV 63
Jotun
Khajal
2782 · LRV 59

Blushing Brilliance reads slightly lighter (LRV 63 vs 59), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms. At ΔE 10.2 these are two genuinely different directions, not variations on a theme.

Compare ↔ΔE 10.2Distinct
Blushing Brilliance
Blushing Brilliance
S 1005-Y60R
Blushing Brilliance vs S 1005-Y60R
Benjamin Moore
Blushing Brilliance
009 · LRV 63
NCS
S 1005-Y60R
S 1005-Y60R · LRV 70

A 7-point LRV gap (70 vs 63) makes S 1005-Y60R the marginally brighter of the two. A ΔE of 12.4 puts them firmly in different territory — a strong contrast if combined.

Compare ↔ΔE 12.4Distinct
Blushing Brilliance
Blushing Brilliance
Light ivory
Light ivory
Blushing Brilliance vs Light ivory
Benjamin Moore
Blushing Brilliance
009 · LRV 63
RAL ClassicClassic
Light ivory
RAL 1015 · LRV 68

A 4-point LRV gap (68 vs 63) makes Light ivory the marginally brighter of the two. A ΔE of 14.3 puts them firmly in different territory — a strong contrast if combined.

Compare ↔ΔE 14.3Distinct