Match Hot Lips

Benjamin Moore Hot Lips is a deep, low-reflectance shade, warm in character with an LRV of 18. The matches below are ranked by ΔE, a perceptual color-difference score.

View full Hot Lips color page →
Hot Lips
Benjamin Moore
Hot Lips
2077-30#BC427FLRV 18Warm

Closest matches across every brand

One match per brand, ranked by ΔE — a perceptual color difference score calculated from Lab color space values. Lower is closer. Click any card to compare side by side in simulated rooms.

Hot Lips
Hot Lips
Telemagenta
Telemagenta
Hot Lips vs Telemagenta
Benjamin Moore
Hot Lips
2077-30 · LRV 18
RAL ClassicClassic
Telemagenta
RAL 4010 · LRV 18

Their light reflectance is nearly identical (LRV 18 vs 18), so neither reads brighter in a room. The ΔE 3.9 gap is real but not dramatic — distinct as a choice, harmonious together.

Compare ↔ΔE 3.9Noticeable
Crushed Berries
Hot Lips
Hot Lips
Crushed Berries vs Hot Lips
Benjamin Moore
Crushed Berries
2076-30 · LRV 17
Benjamin Moore
Hot Lips
2077-30 · LRV 18

With LRVs of 18 and 17, the two reflect almost the same amount of light. At ΔE 4.0 they're clearly different, yet close enough to share a room.

Compare ↔ΔE 4.0Noticeable
Hot Lips
Hot Lips
RAL 510-5
RAL 510-5
Hot Lips vs RAL 510-5
Benjamin Moore
Hot Lips
2077-30 · LRV 18
RAL EffectEffect
RAL 510-5
RAL 510-5 · LRV 16

Their light reflectance is nearly identical (LRV 18 vs 16), so neither reads brighter in a room. The ΔE 6.8 gap is real but not dramatic — distinct as a choice, harmonious together.

Compare ↔ΔE 6.8Noticeable
Hot Lips
Hot Lips
Exuberant Pink
Exuberant Pink
Hot Lips vs Exuberant Pink
Benjamin Moore
Hot Lips
2077-30 · LRV 18
Sherwin-Williams
Exuberant Pink
6840 · LRV 17

Their light reflectance is nearly identical (LRV 18 vs 17), so neither reads brighter in a room. The ΔE 7.2 gap is real but not dramatic — distinct as a choice, harmonious together.

Compare ↔ΔE 7.2Noticeable
Hot Lips
Hot Lips
Tutti Frutti
Hot Lips vs Tutti Frutti
Benjamin Moore
Hot Lips
2077-30 · LRV 18
PPG
Tutti Frutti
PPG17-10 · LRV 21

Tutti Frutti reads slightly lighter (LRV 21 vs 18), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms. At ΔE 9.9 they're clearly different, yet close enough to share a room.

Compare ↔ΔE 9.9Noticeable
Diva Glam
Diva Glam
Hot Lips
Hot Lips
Diva Glam vs Hot Lips
Behr
Diva Glam
P120-6 · LRV 17
Benjamin Moore
Hot Lips
2077-30 · LRV 18

Their light reflectance is nearly identical (LRV 18 vs 17), so neither reads brighter in a room. A ΔE of 11.2 puts them firmly in different territory — a strong contrast if combined.

Compare ↔ΔE 11.2Distinct
Hot Lips
Hot Lips
Mischief
Hot Lips vs Mischief
Benjamin Moore
Hot Lips
2077-30 · LRV 18
Little Greene
Mischief
13 · LRV 13

A 5-point LRV gap (18 vs 13) makes Hot Lips the marginally brighter of the two. A ΔE of 14.8 puts them firmly in different territory — a strong contrast if combined.

Compare ↔ΔE 14.8Distinct
Hot Lips
Hot Lips
Bridesmaid
Bridesmaid
Hot Lips vs Bridesmaid
Benjamin Moore
Hot Lips
2077-30 · LRV 18
Cloverdale Paint
Bridesmaid
1159 · LRV 12

A 6-point LRV gap (18 vs 12) makes Hot Lips the marginally brighter of the two. A ΔE of 16.0 puts them firmly in different territory — a strong contrast if combined.

Compare ↔ΔE 16.0Distinct
Hot Lips
Hot Lips
Rectory Red
Rectory Red
Hot Lips vs Rectory Red
Benjamin Moore
Hot Lips
2077-30 · LRV 18
Farrow & Ball
Rectory Red
217 · LRV 11

Hot Lips reads slightly lighter (LRV 18 vs 11), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms. At ΔE 26.6 these are two genuinely different directions, not variations on a theme.

Compare ↔ΔE 26.6Very different
Hot Lips
Hot Lips
Damson Dream 2
Damson Dream 2
Hot Lips vs Damson Dream 2
Benjamin Moore
Hot Lips
2077-30 · LRV 18
Dulux
Damson Dream 2
85RB 09/313 · LRV 9

A 9-point LRV gap (18 vs 9) makes Hot Lips the marginally brighter of the two. A ΔE of 28.7 puts them firmly in different territory — a strong contrast if combined.

Compare ↔ΔE 28.7Very different
Hot Lips
Hot Lips
Rushing Red
Rushing Red
Hot Lips vs Rushing Red
Benjamin Moore
Hot Lips
2077-30 · LRV 18
Valspar
Rushing Red
V042-6 · LRV 7

A 10-point LRV gap (18 vs 7) makes Hot Lips the marginally brighter of the two. A ΔE of 31.5 puts them firmly in different territory — a strong contrast if combined.

Compare ↔ΔE 31.5Very different
Hot Lips
Hot Lips
Nectar
Hot Lips vs Nectar
Benjamin Moore
Hot Lips
2077-30 · LRV 18
Tikkurila
Nectar
L418 · LRV 16

Their light reflectance is nearly identical (LRV 18 vs 16), so neither reads brighter in a room. A ΔE of 31.8 puts them firmly in different territory — a strong contrast if combined.

Compare ↔ΔE 31.8Very different
Hot Lips
Hot Lips
Hibiscus
Hot Lips vs Hibiscus
Benjamin Moore
Hot Lips
2077-30 · LRV 18
Jotun
Hibiscus
2731 · LRV 14

Hot Lips reads slightly lighter (LRV 18 vs 14), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms. At ΔE 32.9 these are two genuinely different directions, not variations on a theme.

Compare ↔ΔE 32.9Very different
Hot Lips
Hot Lips
S 5040-R
Hot Lips vs S 5040-R
Benjamin Moore
Hot Lips
2077-30 · LRV 18
NCS
S 5040-R
S 5040-R · LRV 6

Hot Lips reads slightly lighter (LRV 18 vs 6), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms. At ΔE 33.8 these are two genuinely different directions, not variations on a theme.

Compare ↔ΔE 33.8Very different