Match Cooking Apple Green

Farrow & Ball Cooking Apple Green is a mid-tone shade, warm in character with an LRV of 54. The matches below are the closest equivalents available across every brand on Pontata, ranked by ΔE — a perceptual color difference score. A ΔE under 3 is subtle; under 10 is noticeable but harmonious; above 25 means genuinely different colors.

View full Cooking Apple Green color page →
Cooking Apple Green
Farrow & Ball
Cooking Apple Green
32#c4c6a5LRV 54Warm

Closest matches across every brand

One match per brand, ranked by ΔE — a perceptual color difference score calculated from Lab color space values. Lower is closer. Click any card to compare side by side in simulated rooms.

Cooking Apple Green
Cooking Apple Green
Sage Splendor
Cooking Apple Green vs Sage Splendor
PPG
Sage Splendor
PPG1115-4 · LRV 54

With LRVs of 54 and 54, the two reflect almost the same amount of light. At ΔE 0.7 you'd need them side by side to tell them apart.

Compare ↔ΔE 0.7Imperceptible
Mesquite
Cooking Apple Green
Cooking Apple Green
Mesquite vs Cooking Apple Green
Benjamin Moore
Mesquite
501 · LRV 53

With LRVs of 54 and 53, the two reflect almost the same amount of light. At ΔE 0.7 you'd need them side by side to tell them apart.

Compare ↔ΔE 0.7Imperceptible
Wispy Mint
Wispy Mint
Cooking Apple Green
Cooking Apple Green
Wispy Mint vs Cooking Apple Green
Cloverdale Paint
Wispy Mint
0750 · LRV 56

Their light reflectance is nearly identical (LRV 56 vs 54), so neither reads brighter in a room. A ΔE of 0.9 means the difference barely reads in a finished room.

Compare ↔ΔE 0.9Imperceptible
Cooking Apple Green
Cooking Apple Green
Nile
Cooking Apple Green vs Nile
Tikkurila
Nile
V386 · LRV 52

Their light reflectance is nearly identical (LRV 54 vs 52), so neither reads brighter in a room. A ΔE of 1.4 means the difference barely reads in a finished room.

Compare ↔ΔE 1.4Subtle
Sage Brush
Sage Brush
Cooking Apple Green
Cooking Apple Green
Sage Brush vs Cooking Apple Green
Behr
Sage Brush
S370-3 · LRV 51

Their light reflectance is nearly identical (LRV 54 vs 51), so neither reads brighter in a room. A ΔE of 2.0 means the difference barely reads in a finished room.

Compare ↔ΔE 2.0Subtle
Cooking Apple Green
Cooking Apple Green
Recycled Glass
Recycled Glass
Cooking Apple Green vs Recycled Glass
Sherwin-Williams
Recycled Glass
7747 · LRV 51

Their light reflectance is nearly identical (LRV 54 vs 51), so neither reads brighter in a room. A ΔE of 2.3 means the difference barely reads in a finished room.

Compare ↔ΔE 2.3Subtle
Cooking Apple Green
Cooking Apple Green
Portland Stone
Portland Stone
Cooking Apple Green vs Portland Stone
Little Greene
Portland Stone
77 · LRV 55

With LRVs of 55 and 54, the two reflect almost the same amount of light. At ΔE 3.1 they're clearly different, yet close enough to share a room.

Compare ↔ΔE 3.1Noticeable
Cooking Apple Green
Cooking Apple Green
Pistachio
Pistachio
Cooking Apple Green vs Pistachio
Jotun
Pistachio
7386 · LRV 58

A 4-point LRV gap (58 vs 54) makes Pistachio the marginally brighter of the two. The ΔE 3.1 gap is real but not dramatic — distinct as a choice, harmonious together.

Compare ↔ΔE 3.1Noticeable
Pale Olivine
Pale Olivine
Cooking Apple Green
Cooking Apple Green
Pale Olivine vs Cooking Apple Green
Dulux
Pale Olivine
90YY 62/166 · LRV 62

Pale Olivine reads slightly lighter (LRV 62 vs 54), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms. At ΔE 3.6 they're clearly different, yet close enough to share a room.

Compare ↔ΔE 3.6Noticeable
Cooking Apple Green
Cooking Apple Green
Freshwater Green
Freshwater Green
Cooking Apple Green vs Freshwater Green
Valspar
Freshwater Green
V061-2 · LRV 56

Their light reflectance is nearly identical (LRV 56 vs 54), so neither reads brighter in a room. The ΔE 5.4 gap is real but not dramatic — distinct as a choice, harmonious together.

Compare ↔ΔE 5.4Noticeable
Cooking Apple Green
Cooking Apple Green
RAL 760-3
RAL 760-3
Cooking Apple Green vs RAL 760-3
RAL EffectEffect
RAL 760-3
RAL 760-3 · LRV 47

A 7-point LRV gap (54 vs 47) makes Cooking Apple Green the marginally brighter of the two. The ΔE 6.1 gap is real but not dramatic — distinct as a choice, harmonious together.

Compare ↔ΔE 6.1Noticeable
Cooking Apple Green
Cooking Apple Green
S 2010-G50Y
S 2010-G50Y
Cooking Apple Green vs S 2010-G50Y
NCS
S 2010-G50Y
S 2010-G50Y · LRV 53

With LRVs of 54 and 53, the two reflect almost the same amount of light. At ΔE 6.4 they're clearly different, yet close enough to share a room.

Compare ↔ΔE 6.4Noticeable
Ball Green
Cooking Apple Green
Ball Green
Cooking Apple Green
Farrow & Ball
Ball Green
75 · LRV 45

Cooking Apple Green reads slightly lighter (LRV 54 vs 45), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms. At ΔE 6.7 they're clearly different, yet close enough to share a room.

Compare ↔ΔE 6.7Noticeable
Cooking Apple Green
Cooking Apple Green
Pastel green
Cooking Apple Green vs Pastel green
RAL ClassicClassic
Pastel green
RAL 6019 · LRV 58

A 5-point LRV gap (58 vs 54) makes Pastel green the marginally brighter of the two. The ΔE 7.3 gap is real but not dramatic — distinct as a choice, harmonious together.

Compare ↔ΔE 7.3Noticeable