Match Gracious Glow

PPG Gracious Glow is a mid-tone shade with an LRV of 42. The matches below are ranked by ΔE, a perceptual color-difference score.

View full Gracious Glow color page →
PPG
Gracious Glow
PPG1116-5#bab078LRV 42

Closest matches across every brand

One match per brand, ranked by ΔE — a perceptual color difference score calculated from Lab color space values. Lower is closer. Click any card to compare side by side in simulated rooms.

Gracious Glow
Cool Avocado
Cool Avocado
Gracious Glow vs Cool Avocado
PPG
Gracious Glow
PPG1116-5 · LRV 42
Sherwin-Williams
Cool Avocado
9029 · LRV 46

A 4-point LRV gap (46 vs 42) makes Cool Avocado the marginally brighter of the two. The ΔE 3.2 gap is real but not dramatic — distinct as a choice, harmonious together.

Compare ↔ΔE 3.2 — Noticeable
Gracious Glow
Secret Scribbles
PPG
Gracious Glow
PPG1116-5 · LRV 42
PPG
Secret Scribbles
PPG11-12 · LRV 40

Their light reflectance is nearly identical (LRV 42 vs 40), so neither reads brighter in a room. The ΔE 3.9 gap is real but not dramatic — distinct as a choice, harmonious together.

Compare ↔ΔE 3.9 — Noticeable
Timothy Straw
Gracious Glow
Timothy Straw vs Gracious Glow
Benjamin Moore
Timothy Straw
2149-40 · LRV 47
PPG
Gracious Glow
PPG1116-5 · LRV 42

A 5-point LRV gap (47 vs 42) makes Timothy Straw the marginally brighter of the two. The ΔE 4.2 gap is real but not dramatic — distinct as a choice, harmonious together.

Compare ↔ΔE 4.2 — Noticeable
Peter Pan
Peter Pan
Gracious Glow
Peter Pan vs Gracious Glow
Cloverdale Paint
Peter Pan
0786 · LRV 39
PPG
Gracious Glow
PPG1116-5 · LRV 42

A 3-point LRV gap (42 vs 39) makes Gracious Glow the marginally brighter of the two. The ΔE 4.7 gap is real but not dramatic — distinct as a choice, harmonious together.

Compare ↔ΔE 4.7 — Noticeable
Churlish Green
Churlish Green
Gracious Glow
Farrow & Ball
Churlish Green
251 · LRV 51
PPG
Gracious Glow
PPG1116-5 · LRV 42

Churlish Green reads slightly lighter (LRV 51 vs 42), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms. At ΔE 5.7 they're clearly different, yet close enough to share a room.

Compare ↔ΔE 5.7 — Noticeable
Oak Apple
Oak Apple
Gracious Glow
Oak Apple vs Gracious Glow
Little Greene
Oak Apple
63 · LRV 53
PPG
Gracious Glow
PPG1116-5 · LRV 42

A 11-point LRV gap (53 vs 42) makes Oak Apple the marginally brighter of the two. The ΔE 6.6 gap is real but not dramatic — distinct as a choice, harmonious together.

Compare ↔ΔE 6.6 — Noticeable
Gracious Glow
Green beige
Green beige
Gracious Glow vs Green beige
PPG
Gracious Glow
PPG1116-5 · LRV 42
RAL ClassicClassic
Green beige
RAL 1000 · LRV 52

Green beige reads slightly lighter (LRV 52 vs 42), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms. At ΔE 6.6 they're clearly different, yet close enough to share a room.

Compare ↔ΔE 6.6 — Noticeable
Gracious Glow
RAL 780-M
RAL 780-M
Gracious Glow vs RAL 780-M
PPG
Gracious Glow
PPG1116-5 · LRV 42
RAL EffectEffect
RAL 780-M
RAL 780-M · LRV 35

Gracious Glow reads slightly lighter (LRV 42 vs 35), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms. At ΔE 8.4 they're clearly different, yet close enough to share a room.

Compare ↔ΔE 8.4 — Noticeable
Honey Nut
Honey Nut
Gracious Glow
Honey Nut vs Gracious Glow
Dulux
Honey Nut
41YY 53/306 · LRV 53
PPG
Gracious Glow
PPG1116-5 · LRV 42

A 11-point LRV gap (53 vs 42) makes Honey Nut the marginally brighter of the two. The ΔE 8.9 gap is real but not dramatic — distinct as a choice, harmonious together.

Compare ↔ΔE 8.9 — Noticeable
Mexico
Gracious Glow
Mexico vs Gracious Glow
Jotun
Mexico
0288 · LRV 35
PPG
Gracious Glow
PPG1116-5 · LRV 42

A 7-point LRV gap (42 vs 35) makes Gracious Glow the marginally brighter of the two. The ΔE 9.3 gap is real but not dramatic — distinct as a choice, harmonious together.

Compare ↔ΔE 9.3 — Noticeable
Gracious Glow
Prairie Sage
Prairie Sage
Gracious Glow vs Prairie Sage
PPG
Gracious Glow
PPG1116-5 · LRV 42
Valspar
Prairie Sage
8003-28E · LRV 29

Gracious Glow reflects far more light (LRV 42 vs 29), opening up a space where Prairie Sage encloses it. At ΔE 10.4 these are two genuinely different directions, not variations on a theme.

Compare ↔ΔE 10.4 — Distinct
Gracious Glow
Toffee
Gracious Glow vs Toffee
PPG
Gracious Glow
PPG1116-5 · LRV 42
Tikkurila
Toffee
V396 · LRV 37

A 5-point LRV gap (42 vs 37) makes Gracious Glow the marginally brighter of the two. A ΔE of 13.1 puts them firmly in different territory — a strong contrast if combined.

Compare ↔ΔE 13.1 — Distinct
Mustard Field
Gracious Glow
Mustard Field vs Gracious Glow
Behr
Mustard Field
HDC-AC-08 · LRV 46
PPG
Gracious Glow
PPG1116-5 · LRV 42

Mustard Field reads slightly lighter (LRV 46 vs 42), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms. At ΔE 13.3 these are two genuinely different directions, not variations on a theme.

Compare ↔ΔE 13.3 — Distinct
S 3030-Y30R
S 3030-Y30R
Gracious Glow
S 3030-Y30R vs Gracious Glow
NCS
S 3030-Y30R
S 3030-Y30R · LRV 33
PPG
Gracious Glow
PPG1116-5 · LRV 42

A 10-point LRV gap (42 vs 33) makes Gracious Glow the marginally brighter of the two. A ΔE of 20.3 puts them firmly in different territory — a strong contrast if combined.

Compare ↔ΔE 20.3 — Distinct