Match Quaking Grass

PPG Quaking Grass is a mid-tone shade with an LRV of 52. The matches below are ranked by ΔE, a perceptual color-difference score.

View full Quaking Grass color page →
PPG
Quaking Grass
PPG1121-4#bbc6a4LRV 52

Closest matches across every brand

One match per brand, ranked by ΔE — a perceptual color difference score calculated from Lab color space values. Lower is closer. Click any card to compare side by side in simulated rooms.

Lily Pad
Quaking Grass
Lily Pad vs Quaking Grass
Benjamin Moore
Lily Pad
480 · LRV 51
PPG
Quaking Grass
PPG1121-4 · LRV 52

With LRVs of 52 and 51, the two reflect almost the same amount of light. At ΔE 1.8 you'd need them side by side to tell them apart.

Compare ↔ΔE 1.8Subtle
Quaking Grass
Freshwater Green
Freshwater Green
Quaking Grass vs Freshwater Green
PPG
Quaking Grass
PPG1121-4 · LRV 52
Valspar
Freshwater Green
V061-2 · LRV 56

Freshwater Green reads slightly lighter (LRV 56 vs 52), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms. At ΔE 2.5 you'd need them side by side to tell them apart.

Compare ↔ΔE 2.5Subtle
Quaking Grass
Valleyview
Quaking Grass vs Valleyview
PPG
Quaking Grass
PPG1121-4 · LRV 52
Sherwin-Williams
Valleyview
9673 · LRV 58

Valleyview reads slightly lighter (LRV 58 vs 52), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms. At ΔE 2.6 you'd need them side by side to tell them apart.

Compare ↔ΔE 2.6Subtle
Garland Pine
Garland Pine
Quaking Grass
Garland Pine vs Quaking Grass
Cloverdale Paint
Garland Pine
0757 · LRV 59
PPG
Quaking Grass
PPG1121-4 · LRV 52

A 7-point LRV gap (59 vs 52) makes Garland Pine the marginally brighter of the two. A ΔE of 2.7 means the difference barely reads in a finished room.

Compare ↔ΔE 2.7Subtle
Quaking Grass
Sage Splendor
PPG
Quaking Grass
PPG1121-4 · LRV 52
PPG
Sage Splendor
PPG1115-4 · LRV 54

Their light reflectance is nearly identical (LRV 54 vs 52), so neither reads brighter in a room. The ΔE 3.1 gap is real but not dramatic — distinct as a choice, harmonious together.

Compare ↔ΔE 3.1Noticeable
Quaking Grass
RAL 760-3
RAL 760-3
Quaking Grass vs RAL 760-3
PPG
Quaking Grass
PPG1121-4 · LRV 52
RAL EffectEffect
RAL 760-3
RAL 760-3 · LRV 47

Quaking Grass reads slightly lighter (LRV 52 vs 47), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms. At ΔE 3.4 they're clearly different, yet close enough to share a room.

Compare ↔ΔE 3.4Noticeable
Cooking Apple Green
Cooking Apple Green
Quaking Grass
Cooking Apple Green vs Quaking Grass
PPG
Quaking Grass
PPG1121-4 · LRV 52

Their light reflectance is nearly identical (LRV 54 vs 52), so neither reads brighter in a room. The ΔE 3.6 gap is real but not dramatic — distinct as a choice, harmonious together.

Compare ↔ΔE 3.6Noticeable
Sage Brush
Sage Brush
Quaking Grass
Sage Brush vs Quaking Grass
Behr
Sage Brush
S370-3 · LRV 51
PPG
Quaking Grass
PPG1121-4 · LRV 52

With LRVs of 52 and 51, the two reflect almost the same amount of light. At ΔE 3.9 they're clearly different, yet close enough to share a room.

Compare ↔ΔE 3.9Noticeable
Quaking Grass
Nile
Quaking Grass vs Nile
PPG
Quaking Grass
PPG1121-4 · LRV 52
Tikkurila
Nile
V386 · LRV 52

With LRVs of 52 and 52, the two reflect almost the same amount of light. At ΔE 4.1 they're clearly different, yet close enough to share a room.

Compare ↔ΔE 4.1Noticeable
Quaking Grass
Pastel green
Quaking Grass vs Pastel green
PPG
Quaking Grass
PPG1121-4 · LRV 52
RAL ClassicClassic
Pastel green
RAL 6019 · LRV 58

Pastel green reads slightly lighter (LRV 58 vs 52), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms. At ΔE 4.3 they're clearly different, yet close enough to share a room.

Compare ↔ΔE 4.3Noticeable
Putting Green
Putting Green
Quaking Grass
Putting Green vs Quaking Grass
PPG
Quaking Grass
PPG1121-4 · LRV 52

A 5-point LRV gap (52 vs 47) makes Quaking Grass the marginally brighter of the two. The ΔE 4.3 gap is real but not dramatic — distinct as a choice, harmonious together.

Compare ↔ΔE 4.3Noticeable
Pistachio
Pistachio
Quaking Grass
Pistachio vs Quaking Grass
Jotun
Pistachio
7386 · LRV 58
PPG
Quaking Grass
PPG1121-4 · LRV 52

Pistachio reads slightly lighter (LRV 58 vs 52), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms. At ΔE 4.4 they're clearly different, yet close enough to share a room.

Compare ↔ΔE 4.4Noticeable
Portland Stone
Portland Stone
Quaking Grass
Portland Stone vs Quaking Grass
Little Greene
Portland Stone
77 · LRV 55
PPG
Quaking Grass
PPG1121-4 · LRV 52

A 3-point LRV gap (55 vs 52) makes Portland Stone the marginally brighter of the two. The ΔE 6.4 gap is real but not dramatic — distinct as a choice, harmonious together.

Compare ↔ΔE 6.4Noticeable
S 2010-G50Y
S 2010-G50Y
Quaking Grass
S 2010-G50Y vs Quaking Grass
NCS
S 2010-G50Y
S 2010-G50Y · LRV 53
PPG
Quaking Grass
PPG1121-4 · LRV 52

Their light reflectance is nearly identical (LRV 53 vs 52), so neither reads brighter in a room. The ΔE 7.7 gap is real but not dramatic — distinct as a choice, harmonious together.

Compare ↔ΔE 7.7Noticeable