Match RAL 560-M
RAL Effect RAL 560-M is a mid-tone shade with an LRV of 32. The matches below are ranked by ΔE, a perceptual color-difference score.
View full RAL 560-M color page →
Closest matches across every brand
One match per brand, ranked by ΔE — a perceptual color difference score calculated from Lab color space values. Lower is closer. Click any card to compare side by side in simulated rooms.
With LRVs of 34 and 32, the two reflect almost the same amount of light. At ΔE 2.8 you'd need them side by side to tell them apart.
Their light reflectance is nearly identical (LRV 33 vs 32), so neither reads brighter in a room. A ΔE of 3.0 means the difference barely reads in a finished room.
A 4-point LRV gap (32 vs 28) makes RAL 560-M the marginally brighter of the two. The ΔE 4.0 gap is real but not dramatic — distinct as a choice, harmonious together.
With LRVs of 32 and 30, the two reflect almost the same amount of light. At ΔE 4.2 they're clearly different, yet close enough to share a room.
With LRVs of 35 and 32, the two reflect almost the same amount of light. At ΔE 4.2 they're clearly different, yet close enough to share a room.
Blueberry milk reads slightly lighter (LRV 38 vs 32), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms. At ΔE 4.4 they're clearly different, yet close enough to share a room.
A 4-point LRV gap (36 vs 32) makes Himalayan Musk 3 the marginally brighter of the two. The ΔE 4.5 gap is real but not dramatic — distinct as a choice, harmonious together.
A 4-point LRV gap (32 vs 28) makes RAL 560-M the marginally brighter of the two. The ΔE 5.8 gap is real but not dramatic — distinct as a choice, harmonious together.
A 3-point LRV gap (36 vs 32) makes S 3010-R80B the marginally brighter of the two. A ΔE of 12.0 puts them firmly in different territory — a strong contrast if combined.
RAL 560-M reads slightly lighter (LRV 32 vs 25), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms. At ΔE 12.5 these are two genuinely different directions, not variations on a theme.