Match Cosmetic Peach

Sherwin-Williams Cosmetic Peach is a light-reflective shade, warm in character with an LRV of 60. The matches below are ranked by ΔE, a perceptual color-difference score.

View full Cosmetic Peach color page →
Cosmetic Peach
Sherwin-Williams
Cosmetic Peach
6618#F3C1ABLRV 60Warm

Closest matches across every brand

One match per brand, ranked by ΔE — a perceptual color difference score calculated from Lab color space values. Lower is closer. Click any card to compare side by side in simulated rooms.

Del Ray Peach
Del Ray Peach
Cosmetic Peach
Cosmetic Peach
Del Ray Peach vs Cosmetic Peach
Benjamin Moore
Del Ray Peach
067 · LRV 57
Sherwin-Williams
Cosmetic Peach
6618 · LRV 60

With LRVs of 60 and 57, the two reflect almost the same amount of light. At ΔE 2.1 you'd need them side by side to tell them apart.

Compare ↔ΔE 2.1Subtle
Spiced Cider
Spiced Cider
Cosmetic Peach
Cosmetic Peach
Spiced Cider vs Cosmetic Peach
Cloverdale Paint
Spiced Cider
1035 · LRV 63
Sherwin-Williams
Cosmetic Peach
6618 · LRV 60

With LRVs of 63 and 60, the two reflect almost the same amount of light. At ΔE 2.7 you'd need them side by side to tell them apart.

Compare ↔ΔE 2.7Subtle
Certain Peach
Certain Peach
Cosmetic Peach
Cosmetic Peach
Certain Peach vs Cosmetic Peach
Sherwin-Williams
Certain Peach
6625 · LRV 58
Sherwin-Williams
Cosmetic Peach
6618 · LRV 60

Their light reflectance is nearly identical (LRV 60 vs 58), so neither reads brighter in a room. The ΔE 3.4 gap is real but not dramatic — distinct as a choice, harmonious together.

Compare ↔ΔE 3.4Noticeable
Siesta
Cosmetic Peach
Cosmetic Peach
Siesta vs Cosmetic Peach
PPG
Siesta
PPG1200-3 · LRV 58
Sherwin-Williams
Cosmetic Peach
6618 · LRV 60

Their light reflectance is nearly identical (LRV 60 vs 58), so neither reads brighter in a room. The ΔE 3.5 gap is real but not dramatic — distinct as a choice, harmonious together.

Compare ↔ΔE 3.5Noticeable
RAL 430-1
RAL 430-1
Cosmetic Peach
Cosmetic Peach
RAL 430-1 vs Cosmetic Peach
RAL EffectEffect
RAL 430-1
RAL 430-1 · LRV 62
Sherwin-Williams
Cosmetic Peach
6618 · LRV 60

Their light reflectance is nearly identical (LRV 62 vs 60), so neither reads brighter in a room. The ΔE 5.4 gap is real but not dramatic — distinct as a choice, harmonious together.

Compare ↔ΔE 5.4Noticeable
Cosmetic Peach
Cosmetic Peach
Magnolia
Magnolia
Cosmetic Peach vs Magnolia
Sherwin-Williams
Cosmetic Peach
6618 · LRV 60
Tikkurila
Magnolia
H320 · LRV 60

Their light reflectance is nearly identical (LRV 60 vs 60), so neither reads brighter in a room. The ΔE 5.9 gap is real but not dramatic — distinct as a choice, harmonious together.

Compare ↔ΔE 5.9Noticeable
Fahrenheit
Cosmetic Peach
Cosmetic Peach
Fahrenheit vs Cosmetic Peach
Behr
Fahrenheit
P190-2 · LRV 71
Sherwin-Williams
Cosmetic Peach
6618 · LRV 60

Fahrenheit reads slightly lighter (LRV 71 vs 60), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms. At ΔE 6.5 they're clearly different, yet close enough to share a room.

Compare ↔ΔE 6.5Noticeable
Sunbaked Terracotta
Sunbaked Terracotta
Cosmetic Peach
Cosmetic Peach
Sunbaked Terracotta vs Cosmetic Peach
Dulux
Sunbaked Terracotta
90YR 53/238 · LRV 53
Sherwin-Williams
Cosmetic Peach
6618 · LRV 60

Cosmetic Peach reads slightly lighter (LRV 60 vs 53), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms. At ΔE 7.7 they're clearly different, yet close enough to share a room.

Compare ↔ΔE 7.7Noticeable
Cosmetic Peach
Cosmetic Peach
Cinnamon Foam
Cinnamon Foam
Cosmetic Peach vs Cinnamon Foam
Sherwin-Williams
Cosmetic Peach
6618 · LRV 60
Valspar
Cinnamon Foam
V085-2 · LRV 65

A 4-point LRV gap (65 vs 60) makes Cinnamon Foam the marginally brighter of the two. The ΔE 7.7 gap is real but not dramatic — distinct as a choice, harmonious together.

Compare ↔ΔE 7.7Noticeable
Faded Terracotta
Faded Terracotta
Cosmetic Peach
Cosmetic Peach
Faded Terracotta vs Cosmetic Peach
Farrow & Ball
Faded Terracotta
CC8 · LRV 52
Sherwin-Williams
Cosmetic Peach
6618 · LRV 60

A 8-point LRV gap (60 vs 52) makes Cosmetic Peach the marginally brighter of the two. The ΔE 7.8 gap is real but not dramatic — distinct as a choice, harmonious together.

Compare ↔ΔE 7.8Noticeable
Arabian Tahr
Cosmetic Peach
Cosmetic Peach
Arabian Tahr vs Cosmetic Peach
Jotun
Arabian Tahr
12184 · LRV 59
Sherwin-Williams
Cosmetic Peach
6618 · LRV 60

Their light reflectance is nearly identical (LRV 60 vs 59), so neither reads brighter in a room. A ΔE of 10.4 puts them firmly in different territory — a strong contrast if combined.

Compare ↔ΔE 10.4Distinct
Castell Pink
Castell Pink
Cosmetic Peach
Cosmetic Peach
Castell Pink vs Cosmetic Peach
Little Greene
Castell Pink
314 · LRV 60
Sherwin-Williams
Cosmetic Peach
6618 · LRV 60

Their light reflectance is nearly identical (LRV 60 vs 60), so neither reads brighter in a room. A ΔE of 10.5 puts them firmly in different territory — a strong contrast if combined.

Compare ↔ΔE 10.5Distinct
Light ivory
Light ivory
Cosmetic Peach
Cosmetic Peach
Light ivory vs Cosmetic Peach
RAL ClassicClassic
Light ivory
RAL 1015 · LRV 68
Sherwin-Williams
Cosmetic Peach
6618 · LRV 60

A 7-point LRV gap (68 vs 60) makes Light ivory the marginally brighter of the two. A ΔE of 12.8 puts them firmly in different territory — a strong contrast if combined.

Compare ↔ΔE 12.8Distinct
S 2005-Y40R
S 2005-Y40R
Cosmetic Peach
Cosmetic Peach
S 2005-Y40R vs Cosmetic Peach
NCS
S 2005-Y40R
S 2005-Y40R · LRV 53
Sherwin-Williams
Cosmetic Peach
6618 · LRV 60

Cosmetic Peach reads slightly lighter (LRV 60 vs 53), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms. At ΔE 14.7 these are two genuinely different directions, not variations on a theme.

Compare ↔ΔE 14.7Distinct