Match Dancing Green

Sherwin-Williams Dancing Green is a light-reflective shade, neutral in character with an LRV of 58. The matches below are the closest equivalents available across every brand on Pontata, ranked by ΔE — a perceptual color difference score. A ΔE under 3 is subtle; under 10 is noticeable but harmonious; above 25 means genuinely different colors.

View full Dancing Green color page →
Dancing Green
Sherwin-Williams
Dancing Green
6716#C5CD8FLRV 58Neutral

Closest matches across every brand

One match per brand, ranked by ΔE — a perceptual color difference score calculated from Lab color space values. Lower is closer. Click any card to compare side by side in simulated rooms.

Green Lime
Green Lime
Dancing Green
Dancing Green
Green Lime vs Dancing Green
Cloverdale Paint
Green Lime
0771 · LRV 66
Sherwin-Williams
Dancing Green
6716 · LRV 58

Green Lime reads slightly lighter (LRV 66 vs 58), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms. At ΔE 3.9 they're clearly different, yet close enough to share a room.

Compare ↔ΔE 3.9Noticeable
Shades of Spring
Dancing Green
Dancing Green
Shades of Spring vs Dancing Green
Benjamin Moore
Shades of Spring
537 · LRV 51
Sherwin-Williams
Dancing Green
6716 · LRV 58

A 7-point LRV gap (58 vs 51) makes Dancing Green the marginally brighter of the two. The ΔE 4.1 gap is real but not dramatic — distinct as a choice, harmonious together.

Compare ↔ΔE 4.1Noticeable
Apple
Apple
Dancing Green
Dancing Green
Apple vs Dancing Green
Little Greene
Apple
137 · LRV 55
Sherwin-Williams
Dancing Green
6716 · LRV 58

A 3-point LRV gap (58 vs 55) makes Dancing Green the marginally brighter of the two. The ΔE 5.6 gap is real but not dramatic — distinct as a choice, harmonious together.

Compare ↔ΔE 5.6Noticeable
Jitterbug
Dancing Green
Dancing Green
Jitterbug vs Dancing Green
PPG
Jitterbug
PPG1118-4 · LRV 49
Sherwin-Williams
Dancing Green
6716 · LRV 58

A 9-point LRV gap (58 vs 49) makes Dancing Green the marginally brighter of the two. The ΔE 5.9 gap is real but not dramatic — distinct as a choice, harmonious together.

Compare ↔ΔE 5.9Noticeable
Dancing Green
Dancing Green
Gleeful
Gleeful
Dancing Green vs Gleeful
Sherwin-Williams
Dancing Green
6716 · LRV 58
Sherwin-Williams
Gleeful
6709 · LRV 66

Gleeful reads slightly lighter (LRV 66 vs 58), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms. At ΔE 7.6 they're clearly different, yet close enough to share a room.

Compare ↔ΔE 7.6Noticeable
RAL 240-1
RAL 240-1
Dancing Green
Dancing Green
RAL 240-1 vs Dancing Green
RAL EffectEffect
RAL 240-1
RAL 240-1 · LRV 63
Sherwin-Williams
Dancing Green
6716 · LRV 58

A 5-point LRV gap (63 vs 58) makes RAL 240-1 the marginally brighter of the two. The ΔE 7.8 gap is real but not dramatic — distinct as a choice, harmonious together.

Compare ↔ΔE 7.8Noticeable
Reviving Green
Reviving Green
Dancing Green
Dancing Green
Reviving Green vs Dancing Green
Behr
Reviving Green
P340-3 · LRV 70
Sherwin-Williams
Dancing Green
6716 · LRV 58

At LRV 70 vs 58, Reviving Green is decisively the brighter choice. A ΔE of 11.4 puts them firmly in different territory — a strong contrast if combined.

Compare ↔ΔE 11.4Distinct
Dancing Green
Dancing Green
Timid Absinthe
Dancing Green vs Timid Absinthe
Sherwin-Williams
Dancing Green
6716 · LRV 58
Valspar
Timid Absinthe
6003-5B · LRV 72

At LRV 72 vs 58, Timid Absinthe is decisively the brighter choice. A ΔE of 12.2 puts them firmly in different territory — a strong contrast if combined.

Compare ↔ΔE 12.2Distinct
Green beige
Green beige
Dancing Green
Dancing Green
Green beige vs Dancing Green
RAL ClassicClassic
Green beige
RAL 1000 · LRV 52
Sherwin-Williams
Dancing Green
6716 · LRV 58

Dancing Green reads slightly lighter (LRV 58 vs 52), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms. At ΔE 13.0 these are two genuinely different directions, not variations on a theme.

Compare ↔ΔE 13.0Distinct
Citrona
Citrona
Dancing Green
Dancing Green
Citrona vs Dancing Green
Farrow & Ball
Citrona
CC3 · LRV 57
Sherwin-Williams
Dancing Green
6716 · LRV 58

With LRVs of 58 and 57, the two reflect almost the same amount of light. At ΔE 13.6 these are two genuinely different directions, not variations on a theme.

Compare ↔ΔE 13.6Distinct
Spring Air
Spring Air
Dancing Green
Dancing Green
Spring Air vs Dancing Green
Jotun
Spring Air
8087 · LRV 59
Sherwin-Williams
Dancing Green
6716 · LRV 58

With LRVs of 59 and 58, the two reflect almost the same amount of light. At ΔE 13.9 these are two genuinely different directions, not variations on a theme.

Compare ↔ΔE 13.9Distinct
Putting Green
Putting Green
Dancing Green
Dancing Green
Putting Green vs Dancing Green
Sherwin-Williams
Dancing Green
6716 · LRV 58

A 11-point LRV gap (58 vs 47) makes Dancing Green the marginally brighter of the two. A ΔE of 14.2 puts them firmly in different territory — a strong contrast if combined.

Compare ↔ΔE 14.2Distinct
Dancing Green
Dancing Green
Straw
Dancing Green vs Straw
Sherwin-Williams
Dancing Green
6716 · LRV 58
Tikkurila
Straw
H456 · LRV 65

A 7-point LRV gap (65 vs 58) makes Straw the marginally brighter of the two. A ΔE of 14.6 puts them firmly in different territory — a strong contrast if combined.

Compare ↔ΔE 14.6Distinct
S 2010-G50Y
S 2010-G50Y
Dancing Green
Dancing Green
S 2010-G50Y vs Dancing Green
NCS
S 2010-G50Y
S 2010-G50Y · LRV 53
Sherwin-Williams
Dancing Green
6716 · LRV 58

A 5-point LRV gap (58 vs 53) makes Dancing Green the marginally brighter of the two. A ΔE of 21.5 puts them firmly in different territory — a strong contrast if combined.

Compare ↔ΔE 21.5Distinct