Match Fading Rose

Sherwin-Williams Fading Rose is a mid-tone shade, warm in character with an LRV of 55. The matches below are the closest equivalents available across every brand on Pontata, ranked by ΔE — a perceptual color difference score. A ΔE under 3 is subtle; under 10 is noticeable but harmonious; above 25 means genuinely different colors.

View full Fading Rose color page →
Fading Rose
Sherwin-Williams
Fading Rose
6296#DABDC1LRV 55Warm

Closest matches across every brand

One match per brand, ranked by ΔE — a perceptual color difference score calculated from Lab color space values. Lower is closer. Click any card to compare side by side in simulated rooms.

Hosanna
Hosanna
Fading Rose
Fading Rose
Hosanna vs Fading Rose
Cloverdale Paint
Hosanna
0103 · LRV 54
Sherwin-Williams
Fading Rose
6296 · LRV 55

With LRVs of 55 and 54, the two reflect almost the same amount of light. At ΔE 1.5 you'd need them side by side to tell them apart.

Compare ↔ΔE 1.5Subtle
Nostalgia
Nostalgia
Fading Rose
Fading Rose
Nostalgia vs Fading Rose
PPG
Nostalgia
PPG1049-3 · LRV 52
Sherwin-Williams
Fading Rose
6296 · LRV 55

Fading Rose reads slightly lighter (LRV 55 vs 52), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms. At ΔE 1.8 you'd need them side by side to tell them apart.

Compare ↔ΔE 1.8Subtle
Kept Love Letters
Fading Rose
Fading Rose
Kept Love Letters vs Fading Rose
Benjamin Moore
Kept Love Letters
CSP-425 · LRV 53
Sherwin-Williams
Fading Rose
6296 · LRV 55

With LRVs of 55 and 53, the two reflect almost the same amount of light. At ΔE 2.4 you'd need them side by side to tell them apart.

Compare ↔ΔE 2.4Subtle
Delightful
Delightful
Fading Rose
Fading Rose
Delightful vs Fading Rose
Sherwin-Williams
Delightful
6289 · LRV 51
Sherwin-Williams
Fading Rose
6296 · LRV 55

A 4-point LRV gap (55 vs 51) makes Fading Rose the marginally brighter of the two. The ΔE 3.3 gap is real but not dramatic — distinct as a choice, harmonious together.

Compare ↔ΔE 3.3Noticeable
Pink Nevada 5
Pink Nevada 5
Fading Rose
Fading Rose
Pink Nevada 5 vs Fading Rose
Dulux
Pink Nevada 5
90RR 62/124 · LRV 62
Sherwin-Williams
Fading Rose
6296 · LRV 55

A 7-point LRV gap (62 vs 55) makes Pink Nevada 5 the marginally brighter of the two. The ΔE 3.8 gap is real but not dramatic — distinct as a choice, harmonious together.

Compare ↔ΔE 3.8Noticeable
Fading Rose
Fading Rose
Pocketful of Promise
Pocketful of Promise
Fading Rose vs Pocketful of Promise
Sherwin-Williams
Fading Rose
6296 · LRV 55
Valspar
Pocketful of Promise
V078-2 · LRV 62

A 7-point LRV gap (62 vs 55) makes Pocketful of Promise the marginally brighter of the two. The ΔE 4.6 gap is real but not dramatic — distinct as a choice, harmonious together.

Compare ↔ΔE 4.6Noticeable
Fading Rose
Fading Rose
X478
Fading Rose vs X478
Sherwin-Williams
Fading Rose
6296 · LRV 55
Tikkurila
X478
X478 · LRV 51

Fading Rose reads slightly lighter (LRV 55 vs 51), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms. At ΔE 5.1 they're clearly different, yet close enough to share a room.

Compare ↔ΔE 5.1Noticeable
RAL 550-2
RAL 550-2
Fading Rose
Fading Rose
RAL 550-2 vs Fading Rose
RAL EffectEffect
RAL 550-2
RAL 550-2 · LRV 54
Sherwin-Williams
Fading Rose
6296 · LRV 55

Their light reflectance is nearly identical (LRV 55 vs 54), so neither reads brighter in a room. The ΔE 6.3 gap is real but not dramatic — distinct as a choice, harmonious together.

Compare ↔ΔE 6.3Noticeable
Confetti
Confetti
Fading Rose
Fading Rose
Confetti vs Fading Rose
Little Greene
Confetti
274 · LRV 67
Sherwin-Williams
Fading Rose
6296 · LRV 55

Confetti reads slightly lighter (LRV 67 vs 55), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms. At ΔE 7.1 they're clearly different, yet close enough to share a room.

Compare ↔ΔE 7.1Noticeable
Sugared Almond
Fading Rose
Fading Rose
Sugared Almond vs Fading Rose
Farrow & Ball
Sugared Almond
9913 · LRV 56
Sherwin-Williams
Fading Rose
6296 · LRV 55

With LRVs of 56 and 55, the two reflect almost the same amount of light. At ΔE 7.1 they're clearly different, yet close enough to share a room.

Compare ↔ΔE 7.1Noticeable
Dusty Lilac
Dusty Lilac
Fading Rose
Fading Rose
Dusty Lilac vs Fading Rose
Behr
Dusty Lilac
N110-1 · LRV 61
Sherwin-Williams
Fading Rose
6296 · LRV 55

A 6-point LRV gap (61 vs 55) makes Dusty Lilac the marginally brighter of the two. The ΔE 8.2 gap is real but not dramatic — distinct as a choice, harmonious together.

Compare ↔ΔE 8.2Noticeable
S 2002-Y50R
S 2002-Y50R
Fading Rose
Fading Rose
S 2002-Y50R vs Fading Rose
NCS
S 2002-Y50R
S 2002-Y50R · LRV 54
Sherwin-Williams
Fading Rose
6296 · LRV 55

With LRVs of 55 and 54, the two reflect almost the same amount of light. At ΔE 8.9 they're clearly different, yet close enough to share a room.

Compare ↔ΔE 8.9Noticeable
Khajal
Khajal
Fading Rose
Fading Rose
Khajal vs Fading Rose
Jotun
Khajal
2782 · LRV 59
Sherwin-Williams
Fading Rose
6296 · LRV 55

Khajal reads slightly lighter (LRV 59 vs 55), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms. At ΔE 9.3 they're clearly different, yet close enough to share a room.

Compare ↔ΔE 9.3Noticeable
Telegrey 4
Telegrey 4
Fading Rose
Fading Rose
Telegrey 4 vs Fading Rose
RAL ClassicClassic
Telegrey 4
RAL 7047 · LRV 59
Sherwin-Williams
Fading Rose
6296 · LRV 55

Telegrey 4 reads slightly lighter (LRV 59 vs 55), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms. At ΔE 11.3 these are two genuinely different directions, not variations on a theme.

Compare ↔ΔE 11.3Distinct