Match Hubbard Squash

Sherwin-Williams Hubbard Squash is a light-reflective shade, warm in character with an LRV of 56. The matches below are the closest equivalents available across every brand on Pontata, ranked by ΔE — a perceptual color difference score. A ΔE under 3 is subtle; under 10 is noticeable but harmonious; above 25 means genuinely different colors.

View full Hubbard Squash color page →
Hubbard Squash
Sherwin-Williams
Hubbard Squash
0044#E9BF8CLRV 56Warm

Closest matches across every brand

One match per brand, ranked by ΔE — a perceptual color difference score calculated from Lab color space values. Lower is closer. Click any card to compare side by side in simulated rooms.

Harvester
Hubbard Squash
Harvester vs Hubbard Squash
Harvester
Hubbard Squash
Sherwin-Williams
Harvester
6373 · LRV 59
Sherwin-Williams
Hubbard Squash
0044 · LRV 56

With LRVs of 59 and 56, the two reflect almost the same amount of light. At ΔE 1.7 you'd need them side by side to tell them apart.

Compare ↔ΔE 1.7Subtle
Chanterelle
Hubbard Squash
Chanterelle vs Hubbard Squash
Chanterelle
Hubbard Squash
Cloverdale Paint
Chanterelle
CA131 · LRV 57
Sherwin-Williams
Hubbard Squash
0044 · LRV 56

With LRVs of 57 and 56, the two reflect almost the same amount of light. At ΔE 2.1 you'd need them side by side to tell them apart.

Compare ↔ΔE 2.1Subtle
Hubbard Squash
Cellini Gold vs Hubbard Squash
Cellini Gold
Hubbard Squash
Behr
Cellini Gold
HDC-CL-18 · LRV 50
Sherwin-Williams
Hubbard Squash
0044 · LRV 56

Hubbard Squash reads slightly lighter (LRV 56 vs 50), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms. At ΔE 3.8 they're clearly different, yet close enough to share a room.

Compare ↔ΔE 3.8Noticeable
Hubbard Squash
Persian Melon vs Hubbard Squash
Persian Melon
Hubbard Squash
Benjamin Moore
Persian Melon
117 · LRV 51
Sherwin-Williams
Hubbard Squash
0044 · LRV 56

A 6-point LRV gap (56 vs 51) makes Hubbard Squash the marginally brighter of the two. The ΔE 3.9 gap is real but not dramatic — distinct as a choice, harmonious together.

Compare ↔ΔE 3.9Noticeable
Hubbard Squash
Lira vs Hubbard Squash
Lira
Hubbard Squash
PPG
Lira
PPG12-06 · LRV 54
Sherwin-Williams
Hubbard Squash
0044 · LRV 56

Their light reflectance is nearly identical (LRV 56 vs 54), so neither reads brighter in a room. The ΔE 4.3 gap is real but not dramatic — distinct as a choice, harmonious together.

Compare ↔ΔE 4.3Noticeable
Golden Ivory
Hubbard Squash
Golden Ivory vs Hubbard Squash
Golden Ivory
Hubbard Squash
Sherwin-Williams
Hubbard Squash
0044 · LRV 56

A 6-point LRV gap (63 vs 56) makes Golden Ivory the marginally brighter of the two. The ΔE 6.5 gap is real but not dramatic — distinct as a choice, harmonious together.

Compare ↔ΔE 6.5Noticeable
Hay
Hubbard Squash
Hay vs Hubbard Squash
Hay
Hubbard Squash
Farrow & Ball
Hay
37 · LRV 58
Sherwin-Williams
Hubbard Squash
0044 · LRV 56

With LRVs of 58 and 56, the two reflect almost the same amount of light. At ΔE 7.9 they're clearly different, yet close enough to share a room.

Compare ↔ΔE 7.9Noticeable
Antique Yellow
Hubbard Squash
Antique Yellow vs Hubbard Squash
Antique Yellow
Hubbard Squash
Jotun
Antique Yellow
1392 · LRV 49
Sherwin-Williams
Hubbard Squash
0044 · LRV 56

Hubbard Squash reads slightly lighter (LRV 56 vs 49), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms. At ΔE 8.0 they're clearly different, yet close enough to share a room.

Compare ↔ΔE 8.0Noticeable
RAL 780-4
Hubbard Squash
RAL 780-4 vs Hubbard Squash
RAL 780-4
Hubbard Squash
RAL EffectEffect
RAL 780-4
RAL 780-4 · LRV 47
Sherwin-Williams
Hubbard Squash
0044 · LRV 56

A 10-point LRV gap (56 vs 47) makes Hubbard Squash the marginally brighter of the two. The ΔE 8.2 gap is real but not dramatic — distinct as a choice, harmonious together.

Compare ↔ΔE 8.2Noticeable
Beige
Hubbard Squash
Beige vs Hubbard Squash
Beige
Hubbard Squash
RAL ClassicClassic
Beige
RAL 1001 · LRV 48
Sherwin-Williams
Hubbard Squash
0044 · LRV 56

A 8-point LRV gap (56 vs 48) makes Hubbard Squash the marginally brighter of the two. The ΔE 8.2 gap is real but not dramatic — distinct as a choice, harmonious together.

Compare ↔ΔE 8.2Noticeable
Bath Stone
Hubbard Squash
Bath Stone vs Hubbard Squash
Bath Stone
Hubbard Squash
Little Greene
Bath Stone
64 · LRV 48
Sherwin-Williams
Hubbard Squash
0044 · LRV 56

Hubbard Squash reads slightly lighter (LRV 56 vs 48), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms. At ΔE 9.3 they're clearly different, yet close enough to share a room.

Compare ↔ΔE 9.3Noticeable
Hubbard Squash
Cinnamon Foam
Hubbard Squash vs Cinnamon Foam
Hubbard Squash
Cinnamon Foam
Sherwin-Williams
Hubbard Squash
0044 · LRV 56
Valspar
Cinnamon Foam
V085-2 · LRV 65

Cinnamon Foam reads slightly lighter (LRV 65 vs 56), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms. At ΔE 11.6 these are two genuinely different directions, not variations on a theme.

Compare ↔ΔE 11.6Distinct
Hubbard Squash
Hubbard Squash vs Playa
Hubbard Squash
Playa
Sherwin-Williams
Hubbard Squash
0044 · LRV 56
Tikkurila
Playa
X395 · LRV 52

A 4-point LRV gap (56 vs 52) makes Hubbard Squash the marginally brighter of the two. A ΔE of 11.8 puts them firmly in different territory — a strong contrast if combined.

Compare ↔ΔE 11.8Distinct
S 3030-Y30R
Hubbard Squash
S 3030-Y30R vs Hubbard Squash
S 3030-Y30R
Hubbard Squash
NCS
S 3030-Y30R
S 3030-Y30R · LRV 33
Sherwin-Williams
Hubbard Squash
0044 · LRV 56

At LRV 56 vs 33, Hubbard Squash is decisively the brighter choice. A ΔE of 17.1 puts them firmly in different territory — a strong contrast if combined.

Compare ↔ΔE 17.1Distinct