Match Hubbard Squash

Sherwin-Williams Hubbard Squash is a light-reflective shade, warm in character with an LRV of 56. The matches below are ranked by ΔE, a perceptual color-difference score.

View full Hubbard Squash color page →
Hubbard Squash
Sherwin-Williams
Hubbard Squash
0044#E9BF8CLRV 56Warm

Closest matches across every brand

One match per brand, ranked by ΔE — a perceptual color difference score calculated from Lab color space values. Lower is closer. Click any card to compare side by side in simulated rooms.

Egyptian Gold
Egyptian Gold
Hubbard Squash
Hubbard Squash
Egyptian Gold vs Hubbard Squash
Cloverdale Paint
Egyptian Gold
0905 · LRV 59
Sherwin-Williams
Hubbard Squash
0044 · LRV 56

Their light reflectance is nearly identical (LRV 59 vs 56), so neither reads brighter in a room. A ΔE of 1.2 means the difference barely reads in a finished room.

Compare ↔ΔE 1.2Subtle
Harvester
Harvester
Hubbard Squash
Hubbard Squash
Harvester vs Hubbard Squash
Sherwin-Williams
Harvester
6373 · LRV 59
Sherwin-Williams
Hubbard Squash
0044 · LRV 56

With LRVs of 59 and 56, the two reflect almost the same amount of light. At ΔE 1.7 you'd need them side by side to tell them apart.

Compare ↔ΔE 1.7Subtle
Cellini Gold
Hubbard Squash
Hubbard Squash
Cellini Gold vs Hubbard Squash
Behr
Cellini Gold
HDC-CL-18 · LRV 50
Sherwin-Williams
Hubbard Squash
0044 · LRV 56

Hubbard Squash reads slightly lighter (LRV 56 vs 50), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms. At ΔE 3.8 they're clearly different, yet close enough to share a room.

Compare ↔ΔE 3.8Noticeable
Persian Melon
Hubbard Squash
Hubbard Squash
Persian Melon vs Hubbard Squash
Benjamin Moore
Persian Melon
117 · LRV 51
Sherwin-Williams
Hubbard Squash
0044 · LRV 56

A 6-point LRV gap (56 vs 51) makes Hubbard Squash the marginally brighter of the two. The ΔE 3.9 gap is real but not dramatic — distinct as a choice, harmonious together.

Compare ↔ΔE 3.9Noticeable
Lira
Hubbard Squash
Hubbard Squash
Lira vs Hubbard Squash
PPG
Lira
PPG12-06 · LRV 54
Sherwin-Williams
Hubbard Squash
0044 · LRV 56

Their light reflectance is nearly identical (LRV 56 vs 54), so neither reads brighter in a room. The ΔE 4.3 gap is real but not dramatic — distinct as a choice, harmonious together.

Compare ↔ΔE 4.3Noticeable
RAL 310-2
Hubbard Squash
RAL 310-2
Hubbard Squash
RAL EffectEffect
RAL 310-2
RAL 310-2 · LRV 59
Sherwin-Williams
Hubbard Squash
0044 · LRV 56

With LRVs of 59 and 56, the two reflect almost the same amount of light. At ΔE 4.4 they're clearly different, yet close enough to share a room.

Compare ↔ΔE 4.4Noticeable
Golden Ivory
Golden Ivory
Hubbard Squash
Hubbard Squash
Golden Ivory vs Hubbard Squash
Sherwin-Williams
Hubbard Squash
0044 · LRV 56

A 6-point LRV gap (63 vs 56) makes Golden Ivory the marginally brighter of the two. The ΔE 6.5 gap is real but not dramatic — distinct as a choice, harmonious together.

Compare ↔ΔE 6.5Noticeable
Hubbard Squash
Madeleine
Hubbard Squash
Little Greene
Madeleine
338 · LRV 52
Sherwin-Williams
Hubbard Squash
0044 · LRV 56

A 4-point LRV gap (56 vs 52) makes Hubbard Squash the marginally brighter of the two. The ΔE 6.7 gap is real but not dramatic — distinct as a choice, harmonious together.

Compare ↔ΔE 6.7Noticeable
Hay
Hay
Hubbard Squash
Hubbard Squash
Hay vs Hubbard Squash
Farrow & Ball
Hay
37 · LRV 58
Sherwin-Williams
Hubbard Squash
0044 · LRV 56

With LRVs of 58 and 56, the two reflect almost the same amount of light. At ΔE 7.9 they're clearly different, yet close enough to share a room.

Compare ↔ΔE 7.9Noticeable
Antique Yellow
Antique Yellow
Hubbard Squash
Hubbard Squash
Antique Yellow vs Hubbard Squash
Jotun
Antique Yellow
1392 · LRV 49
Sherwin-Williams
Hubbard Squash
0044 · LRV 56

Hubbard Squash reads slightly lighter (LRV 56 vs 49), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms. At ΔE 8.0 they're clearly different, yet close enough to share a room.

Compare ↔ΔE 8.0Noticeable
Beige
Beige
Hubbard Squash
Hubbard Squash
Beige vs Hubbard Squash
RAL ClassicClassic
Beige
RAL 1001 · LRV 48
Sherwin-Williams
Hubbard Squash
0044 · LRV 56

A 8-point LRV gap (56 vs 48) makes Hubbard Squash the marginally brighter of the two. The ΔE 8.2 gap is real but not dramatic — distinct as a choice, harmonious together.

Compare ↔ΔE 8.2Noticeable
Hubbard Squash
Hubbard Squash
Cinnamon Foam
Cinnamon Foam
Hubbard Squash vs Cinnamon Foam
Sherwin-Williams
Hubbard Squash
0044 · LRV 56
Valspar
Cinnamon Foam
V085-2 · LRV 65

Cinnamon Foam reads slightly lighter (LRV 65 vs 56), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms. At ΔE 11.6 these are two genuinely different directions, not variations on a theme.

Compare ↔ΔE 11.6Distinct
Hubbard Squash
Hubbard Squash
Playa
Hubbard Squash vs Playa
Sherwin-Williams
Hubbard Squash
0044 · LRV 56
Tikkurila
Playa
X395 · LRV 52

A 4-point LRV gap (56 vs 52) makes Hubbard Squash the marginally brighter of the two. A ΔE of 11.8 puts them firmly in different territory — a strong contrast if combined.

Compare ↔ΔE 11.8Distinct
S 3030-Y30R
S 3030-Y30R
Hubbard Squash
Hubbard Squash
S 3030-Y30R vs Hubbard Squash
NCS
S 3030-Y30R
S 3030-Y30R · LRV 33
Sherwin-Williams
Hubbard Squash
0044 · LRV 56

At LRV 56 vs 33, Hubbard Squash is decisively the brighter choice. A ΔE of 17.1 puts them firmly in different territory — a strong contrast if combined.

Compare ↔ΔE 17.1Distinct