Match Rosy Outlook

Sherwin-Williams Rosy Outlook is a light-reflective shade, warm in character with an LRV of 66. The matches below are the closest equivalents available across every brand on Pontata, ranked by ΔE — a perceptual color difference score. A ΔE under 3 is subtle; under 10 is noticeable but harmonious; above 25 means genuinely different colors.

View full Rosy Outlook color page →
Rosy Outlook
Sherwin-Williams
Rosy Outlook
6316#EBCECBLRV 66Warm

Closest matches across every brand

One match per brand, ranked by ΔE — a perceptual color difference score calculated from Lab color space values. Lower is closer. Click any card to compare side by side in simulated rooms.

Cool Melon
Cool Melon
Rosy Outlook
Rosy Outlook
Cool Melon vs Rosy Outlook
PPG
Cool Melon
PPG1057-2 · LRV 66
Sherwin-Williams
Rosy Outlook
6316 · LRV 66

Their light reflectance is nearly identical (LRV 66 vs 66), so neither reads brighter in a room. A ΔE of 1.5 means the difference barely reads in a finished room.

Compare ↔ΔE 1.5Subtle
Innocence
Innocence
Rosy Outlook
Rosy Outlook
Innocence vs Rosy Outlook
Sherwin-Williams
Innocence
6302 · LRV 68
Sherwin-Williams
Rosy Outlook
6316 · LRV 66

Their light reflectance is nearly identical (LRV 68 vs 66), so neither reads brighter in a room. A ΔE of 1.6 means the difference barely reads in a finished room.

Compare ↔ΔE 1.6Subtle
Confetti
Confetti
Rosy Outlook
Rosy Outlook
Confetti vs Rosy Outlook
Little Greene
Confetti
274 · LRV 67
Sherwin-Williams
Rosy Outlook
6316 · LRV 66

With LRVs of 67 and 66, the two reflect almost the same amount of light. At ΔE 1.9 you'd need them side by side to tell them apart.

Compare ↔ΔE 1.9Subtle
Tippy Toes
Rosy Outlook
Rosy Outlook
Tippy Toes vs Rosy Outlook
Benjamin Moore
Tippy Toes
1282 · LRV 69
Sherwin-Williams
Rosy Outlook
6316 · LRV 66

Tippy Toes reads slightly lighter (LRV 69 vs 66), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms. At ΔE 2.4 you'd need them side by side to tell them apart.

Compare ↔ΔE 2.4Subtle
Rosy Outlook
Rosy Outlook
Milkshake
Rosy Outlook vs Milkshake
Sherwin-Williams
Rosy Outlook
6316 · LRV 66
Tikkurila
Milkshake
Y411 · LRV 66

With LRVs of 66 and 66, the two reflect almost the same amount of light. At ΔE 2.7 you'd need them side by side to tell them apart.

Compare ↔ΔE 2.7Subtle
Rosy Outlook
Rosy Outlook
Pocketful of Promise
Pocketful of Promise
Rosy Outlook vs Pocketful of Promise
Sherwin-Williams
Rosy Outlook
6316 · LRV 66
Valspar
Pocketful of Promise
V078-2 · LRV 62

A 4-point LRV gap (66 vs 62) makes Rosy Outlook the marginally brighter of the two. A ΔE of 2.8 means the difference barely reads in a finished room.

Compare ↔ΔE 2.8Subtle
Pink Coral
Pink Coral
Rosy Outlook
Rosy Outlook
Pink Coral vs Rosy Outlook
Cloverdale Paint
Pink Coral
0083 · LRV 66
Sherwin-Williams
Rosy Outlook
6316 · LRV 66

With LRVs of 66 and 66, the two reflect almost the same amount of light. At ΔE 2.8 you'd need them side by side to tell them apart.

Compare ↔ΔE 2.8Subtle
Calamine
Calamine
Rosy Outlook
Rosy Outlook
Calamine vs Rosy Outlook
Farrow & Ball
Calamine
230 · LRV 68
Sherwin-Williams
Rosy Outlook
6316 · LRV 66

Their light reflectance is nearly identical (LRV 68 vs 66), so neither reads brighter in a room. The ΔE 3.4 gap is real but not dramatic — distinct as a choice, harmonious together.

Compare ↔ΔE 3.4Noticeable
RAL 490-1
RAL 490-1
Rosy Outlook
Rosy Outlook
RAL 490-1 vs Rosy Outlook
RAL EffectEffect
RAL 490-1
RAL 490-1 · LRV 70
Sherwin-Williams
Rosy Outlook
6316 · LRV 66

A 4-point LRV gap (70 vs 66) makes RAL 490-1 the marginally brighter of the two. The ΔE 3.4 gap is real but not dramatic — distinct as a choice, harmonious together.

Compare ↔ΔE 3.4Noticeable
Pink Nevada 5
Pink Nevada 5
Rosy Outlook
Rosy Outlook
Pink Nevada 5 vs Rosy Outlook
Dulux
Pink Nevada 5
90RR 62/124 · LRV 62
Sherwin-Williams
Rosy Outlook
6316 · LRV 66

A 4-point LRV gap (66 vs 62) makes Rosy Outlook the marginally brighter of the two. The ΔE 4.1 gap is real but not dramatic — distinct as a choice, harmonious together.

Compare ↔ΔE 4.1Noticeable
Angelico
Angelico
Rosy Outlook
Rosy Outlook
Angelico vs Rosy Outlook
Behr
Angelico
S180-1 · LRV 67
Sherwin-Williams
Rosy Outlook
6316 · LRV 66

With LRVs of 67 and 66, the two reflect almost the same amount of light. At ΔE 5.2 they're clearly different, yet close enough to share a room.

Compare ↔ΔE 5.2Noticeable
Khajal
Khajal
Rosy Outlook
Rosy Outlook
Khajal vs Rosy Outlook
Jotun
Khajal
2782 · LRV 59
Sherwin-Williams
Rosy Outlook
6316 · LRV 66

Rosy Outlook reads slightly lighter (LRV 66 vs 59), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms. At ΔE 7.1 they're clearly different, yet close enough to share a room.

Compare ↔ΔE 7.1Noticeable
S 1005-Y60R
Rosy Outlook
Rosy Outlook
S 1005-Y60R vs Rosy Outlook
NCS
S 1005-Y60R
S 1005-Y60R · LRV 70
Sherwin-Williams
Rosy Outlook
6316 · LRV 66

A 4-point LRV gap (70 vs 66) makes S 1005-Y60R the marginally brighter of the two. The ΔE 7.3 gap is real but not dramatic — distinct as a choice, harmonious together.

Compare ↔ΔE 7.3Noticeable
Cream
Cream
Rosy Outlook
Rosy Outlook
Cream vs Rosy Outlook
RAL ClassicClassic
Cream
RAL 9001 · LRV 76
Sherwin-Williams
Rosy Outlook
6316 · LRV 66

Cream reads slightly lighter (LRV 76 vs 66), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms. At ΔE 10.4 these are two genuinely different directions, not variations on a theme.

Compare ↔ΔE 10.4Distinct