Match Warming Peach
Sherwin-Williams Warming Peach is a mid-tone shade, warm in character with an LRV of 54. The matches below are ranked by ΔE, a perceptual color-difference score.
View full Warming Peach color page →
Closest matches across every brand
One match per brand, ranked by ΔE — a perceptual color difference score calculated from Lab color space values. Lower is closer. Click any card to compare side by side in simulated rooms.
With LRVs of 54 and 54, the two reflect almost the same amount of light. At ΔE 1.3 you'd need them side by side to tell them apart.
A 3-point LRV gap (54 vs 51) makes Warming Peach the marginally brighter of the two. A ΔE of 1.9 means the difference barely reads in a finished room.
Their light reflectance is nearly identical (LRV 54 vs 53), so neither reads brighter in a room. The ΔE 3.4 gap is real but not dramatic — distinct as a choice, harmonious together.
With LRVs of 54 and 54, the two reflect almost the same amount of light. At ΔE 3.7 they're clearly different, yet close enough to share a room.
Their light reflectance is nearly identical (LRV 54 vs 52), so neither reads brighter in a room. The ΔE 4.9 gap is real but not dramatic — distinct as a choice, harmonious together.
With LRVs of 54 and 53, the two reflect almost the same amount of light. At ΔE 5.1 they're clearly different, yet close enough to share a room.
Warming Peach reads slightly lighter (LRV 54 vs 49), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms. At ΔE 5.1 they're clearly different, yet close enough to share a room.
With LRVs of 54 and 51, the two reflect almost the same amount of light. At ΔE 5.6 they're clearly different, yet close enough to share a room.
A 6-point LRV gap (54 vs 48) makes Warming Peach the marginally brighter of the two. The ΔE 5.7 gap is real but not dramatic — distinct as a choice, harmonious together.
Warming Peach reads slightly lighter (LRV 54 vs 50), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms. At ΔE 6.6 they're clearly different, yet close enough to share a room.
A 8-point LRV gap (62 vs 54) makes RAL 430-1 the marginally brighter of the two. The ΔE 7.1 gap is real but not dramatic — distinct as a choice, harmonious together.
A 5-point LRV gap (59 vs 54) makes Arabian Tahr the marginally brighter of the two. The ΔE 8.3 gap is real but not dramatic — distinct as a choice, harmonious together.
A 5-point LRV gap (58 vs 54) makes Ivory the marginally brighter of the two. A ΔE of 11.5 puts them firmly in different territory — a strong contrast if combined.
With LRVs of 54 and 53, the two reflect almost the same amount of light. At ΔE 11.8 these are two genuinely different directions, not variations on a theme.