Charcoal Blue vs Rice Paddy
Both from Sherwin-Williams's palette. Charcoal Blue reads as blue-grey, while Rice Paddy reads as beige-yellow — two distinct hue families, not close cousins. Rice Paddy (LRV 66) reflects noticeably more light than Charcoal Blue (LRV 6), a difference of 60 points that becomes especially apparent in rooms with limited natural light. Charcoal Blue runs cool while Rice Paddy is decidedly warm, which means they'll respond very differently to warm vs cool light sources. With a ΔE of 62.6, the contrast is hard to miss. These aren't variations on a theme — they're two different answers to the same question. Below, 5 simulated room previews show how each color reads at scale — real-room photos will be added as they become available.
Color Details
Charcoal Blue vs Rice Paddy Simulated Comparison
5 simulated room previews — drag the slider on each to see Charcoal Blue on one side and Rice Paddy on the other.
Digital color is approximate. These simulations are generated from the manufacturer's hex values and overlaid on grayscale room photos — your screen's calibration, brightness, and viewing angle all affect how they render. Before committing to either color, test physical samples in your own space under the light you actually live with.
More Charcoal Blue comparisons
See how Charcoal Blue stacks up against other well-photographed colors across different brands and tones.
With LRVs of 6 and 4, the two reflect almost the same amount of light.
Pure White reflects far more light (LRV 84 vs 6), opening up a space where Charcoal Blue encloses it.