Match Arabian Tahr
Jotun Arabian Tahr is a light-reflective shade, warm in character with an LRV of 59. The matches below are ranked by ΔE, a perceptual color-difference score.
View full Arabian Tahr color page →
Closest matches across every brand
One match per brand, ranked by ΔE — a perceptual color difference score calculated from Lab color space values. Lower is closer. Click any card to compare side by side in simulated rooms.
Arabian Tahr reads slightly lighter (LRV 59 vs 55), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms. At ΔE 1.0 you'd need them side by side to tell them apart.
With LRVs of 59 and 58, the two reflect almost the same amount of light. At ΔE 1.3 you'd need them side by side to tell them apart.
With LRVs of 60 and 59, the two reflect almost the same amount of light. At ΔE 1.5 you'd need them side by side to tell them apart.
With LRVs of 59 and 58, the two reflect almost the same amount of light. At ΔE 1.7 you'd need them side by side to tell them apart.
Their light reflectance is nearly identical (LRV 60 vs 59), so neither reads brighter in a room. A ΔE of 1.8 means the difference barely reads in a finished room.
With LRVs of 60 and 59, the two reflect almost the same amount of light. At ΔE 2.0 you'd need them side by side to tell them apart.
With LRVs of 59 and 56, the two reflect almost the same amount of light. At ΔE 2.0 you'd need them side by side to tell them apart.
Arabian Tahr reads slightly lighter (LRV 59 vs 54), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms. At ΔE 3.1 they're clearly different, yet close enough to share a room.
With LRVs of 59 and 59, the two reflect almost the same amount of light. At ΔE 3.2 they're clearly different, yet close enough to share a room.
Their light reflectance is nearly identical (LRV 59 vs 59), so neither reads brighter in a room. The ΔE 3.3 gap is real but not dramatic — distinct as a choice, harmonious together.
Their light reflectance is nearly identical (LRV 59 vs 59), so neither reads brighter in a room. The ΔE 4.3 gap is real but not dramatic — distinct as a choice, harmonious together.
A 6-point LRV gap (59 vs 53) makes Arabian Tahr the marginally brighter of the two. The ΔE 4.8 gap is real but not dramatic — distinct as a choice, harmonious together.
With LRVs of 59 and 57, the two reflect almost the same amount of light. At ΔE 6.3 they're clearly different, yet close enough to share a room.
Light ivory reads slightly lighter (LRV 68 vs 59), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms. At ΔE 6.9 they're clearly different, yet close enough to share a room.