Match Emberglow

Sherwin-Williams Emberglow is a mid-tone shade, warm in character with an LRV of 29. The matches below are ranked by ΔE, a perceptual color-difference score.

View full Emberglow color page →
Emberglow
Sherwin-Williams
Emberglow
6627#D67C56LRV 29Warm

Closest matches across every brand

One match per brand, ranked by ΔE — a perceptual color difference score calculated from Lab color space values. Lower is closer. Click any card to compare side by side in simulated rooms.

Copper Penny
Emberglow
Emberglow
Copper Penny vs Emberglow
PPG
Copper Penny
PPG17-24 · LRV 27
Sherwin-Williams
Emberglow
6627 · LRV 29

Their light reflectance is nearly identical (LRV 29 vs 27), so neither reads brighter in a room. A ΔE of 1.7 means the difference barely reads in a finished room.

Compare ↔ΔE 1.7Subtle
Bryce Canyon
Emberglow
Emberglow
Bryce Canyon vs Emberglow
Benjamin Moore
Bryce Canyon
098 · LRV 28
Sherwin-Williams
Emberglow
6627 · LRV 29

Their light reflectance is nearly identical (LRV 29 vs 28), so neither reads brighter in a room. A ΔE of 2.8 means the difference barely reads in a finished room.

Compare ↔ΔE 2.8Subtle
Copper Harbor
Copper Harbor
Emberglow
Emberglow
Copper Harbor vs Emberglow
Sherwin-Williams
Copper Harbor
6634 · LRV 30
Sherwin-Williams
Emberglow
6627 · LRV 29

With LRVs of 30 and 29, the two reflect almost the same amount of light. At ΔE 3.0 they're clearly different, yet close enough to share a room.

Compare ↔ΔE 3.0Noticeable
Jack-O-Lantern
Emberglow
Jack-O-Lantern
Emberglow
Cloverdale Paint
Jack-O-Lantern
1038 · LRV 30
Sherwin-Williams
Emberglow
6627 · LRV 29

Their light reflectance is nearly identical (LRV 30 vs 29), so neither reads brighter in a room. The ΔE 4.0 gap is real but not dramatic — distinct as a choice, harmonious together.

Compare ↔ΔE 4.0Noticeable
Orioles
Emberglow
Emberglow
Orioles vs Emberglow
Behr
Orioles
P190-5 · LRV 37
Sherwin-Williams
Emberglow
6627 · LRV 29

Orioles reads slightly lighter (LRV 37 vs 29), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms. At ΔE 7.3 they're clearly different, yet close enough to share a room.

Compare ↔ΔE 7.3Noticeable
RAL 420-3
RAL 420-3
Emberglow
Emberglow
RAL 420-3 vs Emberglow
RAL EffectEffect
RAL 420-3
RAL 420-3 · LRV 37
Sherwin-Williams
Emberglow
6627 · LRV 29

A 7-point LRV gap (37 vs 29) makes RAL 420-3 the marginally brighter of the two. The ΔE 7.4 gap is real but not dramatic — distinct as a choice, harmonious together.

Compare ↔ΔE 7.4Noticeable
Frosted Papaya
Frosted Papaya
Emberglow
Emberglow
Frosted Papaya vs Emberglow
Dulux
Frosted Papaya
60YR 31/368 · LRV 31
Sherwin-Williams
Emberglow
6627 · LRV 29

With LRVs of 31 and 29, the two reflect almost the same amount of light. At ΔE 8.1 they're clearly different, yet close enough to share a room.

Compare ↔ΔE 8.1Noticeable
Emberglow
Emberglow
Pinch of Clove
Pinch of Clove
Emberglow vs Pinch of Clove
Sherwin-Williams
Emberglow
6627 · LRV 29
Valspar
Pinch of Clove
P082 · LRV 31

Their light reflectance is nearly identical (LRV 31 vs 29), so neither reads brighter in a room. The ΔE 8.7 gap is real but not dramatic — distinct as a choice, harmonious together.

Compare ↔ΔE 8.7Noticeable
Salmon pink
Emberglow
Salmon pink
Emberglow
RAL ClassicClassic
Salmon pink
RAL 3022 · LRV 25
Sherwin-Williams
Emberglow
6627 · LRV 29

A 4-point LRV gap (29 vs 25) makes Emberglow the marginally brighter of the two. A ΔE of 10.5 puts them firmly in different territory — a strong contrast if combined.

Compare ↔ΔE 10.5Distinct
Bella
Bella
Emberglow
Emberglow
Bella vs Emberglow
Jotun
Bella
2489 · LRV 37
Sherwin-Williams
Emberglow
6627 · LRV 29

Bella reads slightly lighter (LRV 37 vs 29), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms. At ΔE 11.6 these are two genuinely different directions, not variations on a theme.

Compare ↔ΔE 11.6Distinct
Red Earth
Emberglow
Red Earth
Emberglow
Farrow & Ball
Red Earth
64 · LRV 28
Sherwin-Williams
Emberglow
6627 · LRV 29

With LRVs of 29 and 28, the two reflect almost the same amount of light. At ΔE 13.7 these are two genuinely different directions, not variations on a theme.

Compare ↔ΔE 13.7Distinct
Emberglow
Emberglow
Flamingo
Sherwin-Williams
Emberglow
6627 · LRV 29
Tikkurila
Flamingo
K319 · LRV 34

A 5-point LRV gap (34 vs 29) makes Flamingo the marginally brighter of the two. A ΔE of 16.4 puts them firmly in different territory — a strong contrast if combined.

Compare ↔ΔE 16.4Distinct
Orange Aurora
Orange Aurora
Emberglow
Emberglow
Orange Aurora vs Emberglow
Little Greene
Orange Aurora
21 · LRV 26
Sherwin-Williams
Emberglow
6627 · LRV 29

Emberglow reads slightly lighter (LRV 29 vs 26), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms. At ΔE 17.4 these are two genuinely different directions, not variations on a theme.

Compare ↔ΔE 17.4Distinct
S 3030-Y30R
S 3030-Y30R
Emberglow
Emberglow
S 3030-Y30R vs Emberglow
NCS
S 3030-Y30R
S 3030-Y30R · LRV 33
Sherwin-Williams
Emberglow
6627 · LRV 29

A 3-point LRV gap (33 vs 29) makes S 3030-Y30R the marginally brighter of the two. A ΔE of 18.2 puts them firmly in different territory — a strong contrast if combined.

Compare ↔ΔE 18.2Distinct