Timeless Ruby vs Windmill Lane
Timeless Ruby (Behr) and Windmill Lane (Little Greene) come from different manufacturers. Timeless Ruby reads as pink-red, while Windmill Lane reads as green-grey — two distinct hue families, not close cousins. The 20-point LRV gap — 31 for Windmill Lane vs 11 for Timeless Ruby — means Windmill Lane will open up a space more effectively. Where Timeless Ruby leans red, Windmill Lane reads green — a distinction that shifts noticeably depending on the light source and surrounding finishes. A ΔE of 51.6 puts these firmly in different territory — two distinct design choices rather than close alternatives. Below you'll find 1 real-room photo comparison where both colors appear side by side, plus 5 simulated room previews.
Timeless Ruby vs Windmill Lane in Real Spaces
1 real room side by side. Seeing Timeless Ruby and Windmill Lane in actual rooms makes the difference concrete; browse the spaces below to get a feel for how each color lives on a wall.
Bedroom
Bedrooms are typically lit with warmer, lower light than the rest of the house — a condition that flatters warm tones and deepens cool ones. Windmill Lane returns significantly more light to the room — in a smaller or darker space, that difference in perceived brightness is hard to miss.
Color Details
Timeless Ruby vs Windmill Lane Simulated Comparison
5 simulated room previews — drag the slider on each to see Timeless Ruby on one side and Windmill Lane on the other.
Digital color is approximate. These simulations are generated from the manufacturer's hex values and overlaid on grayscale room photos — your screen's calibration, brightness, and viewing angle all affect how they render. Before committing to either color, test physical samples in your own space under the light you actually live with.
More Timeless Ruby comparisons
See how Timeless Ruby stacks up against other well-photographed colors across different brands and tones.
