Cascabel Chile vs RAL 340-4
Cascabel Chile (Benjamin Moore) and RAL 340-4 (RAL Effect) come from different manufacturers. These are both pinks, so the question isn't which hue to choose — it's where within pink to land. Their light reflectance values are nearly the same — 8 vs 7 — so neither will read significantly brighter or darker than the other. A ΔE of 2.5 puts them in subtle territory — distinguishable in direct comparison, less so from across a room. Below you'll find 1 real-room photo comparison where both colors appear side by side, plus 5 simulated room previews.
Cascabel Chile vs RAL 340-4 in Real Spaces
1 real room side by side. Cascabel Chile and RAL 340-4 are close enough that the difference can be hard to judge from a chip alone — these photos show how each reads at scale, across different spaces and lighting conditions.
Kitchen
Kitchens often have the harshest, most revealing light in the house — under-cabinet LEDs and overhead fixtures that strip away subtlety. In photos like these you're seeing the difference at its most direct. In a finished room, the distinction is there but not dramatic.
Color Details
Cascabel Chile vs RAL 340-4 Simulated Comparison
5 simulated room previews — drag the slider on each to see Cascabel Chile on one side and RAL 340-4 on the other.
Digital color is approximate. These simulations are generated from the manufacturer's hex values and overlaid on grayscale room photos — your screen's calibration, brightness, and viewing angle all affect how they render. Before committing to either color, test physical samples in your own space under the light you actually live with.
More Cascabel Chile comparisons
See how Cascabel Chile stacks up against other well-photographed colors across different brands and tones.
