Blue Pot vs Kittiwake
Blue Pot (Cloverdale Paint) and Kittiwake (Farrow & Ball) come from different manufacturers. These are both blues, so the question isn't which hue to choose — it's where within blue to land. The 4-point LRV gap — 43 for Blue Pot vs 39 for Kittiwake — means Blue Pot will open up a space more effectively. A ΔE of 2.1 puts them in subtle territory — distinguishable in direct comparison, less so from across a room. Below you'll find 2 real-room photo comparisons where both colors appear side by side, plus 5 simulated room previews.
Blue Pot vs Kittiwake in Real Spaces
2 real rooms side by side. Blue Pot and Kittiwake are close enough that the difference can be hard to judge from a chip alone — these photos show how each reads at scale, across different spaces and lighting conditions.
Living Room
A living room wall sees more varied light than almost any other surface in the house, which makes the choice between these two more nuanced than a chip suggests. Blue Pot reads slightly lighter here — a subtle but real difference in how open the space feels.
Bedroom
Bedrooms are typically lit with warmer, lower light than the rest of the house — a condition that flatters warm tones and deepens cool ones. Blue Pot has the edge in reflectance, which shows as a quiet sense of added space rather than an obvious contrast.
Color Details
Blue Pot vs Kittiwake Simulated Comparison
5 simulated room previews — drag the slider on each to see Blue Pot on one side and Kittiwake on the other.
Digital color is approximate. These simulations are generated from the manufacturer's hex values and overlaid on grayscale room photos — your screen's calibration, brightness, and viewing angle all affect how they render. Before committing to either color, test physical samples in your own space under the light you actually live with.
More Blue Pot comparisons
See how Blue Pot stacks up against other well-photographed colors across different brands and tones.
