Baby's Mittens vs Duck Green
Baby's Mittens (Benjamin Moore) and Duck Green (Farrow & Ball) come from different manufacturers. Baby's Mittens reads as pink, while Duck Green reads as green-grey — two distinct hue families, not close cousins. The 52-point LRV gap — 60 for Baby's Mittens vs 8 for Duck Green — means Baby's Mittens will open up a space more effectively. Both share a neutral character, which means they'll respond to light and surrounding materials in similar ways. A ΔE of 55.4 puts these firmly in different territory — two distinct design choices rather than close alternatives. Below, 5 simulated room previews show how each color reads at scale — real-room photos will be added as they become available.
Color Details
Baby's Mittens vs Duck Green Simulated Comparison
5 simulated room previews — drag the slider on each to see Baby's Mittens on one side and Duck Green on the other.
Digital color is approximate. These simulations are generated from the manufacturer's hex values and overlaid on grayscale room photos — your screen's calibration, brightness, and viewing angle all affect how they render. Before committing to either color, test physical samples in your own space under the light you actually live with.
More Baby's Mittens comparisons
See how Baby's Mittens stacks up against other well-photographed colors across different brands and tones.
A 9-point LRV gap (69 vs 60) makes Ammonite the marginally brighter of the two.
White Dove reflects far more light (LRV 83 vs 60), opening up a space where Baby's Mittens encloses it.
Baby's Mittens reflects far more light (LRV 60 vs 6), opening up a space where Iron Ore encloses it.
A 8-point LRV gap (60 vs 52) makes Baby's Mittens the marginally brighter of the two.
At LRV 60 vs 30, Baby's Mittens is decisively the brighter choice.
Baby's Mittens reads slightly lighter (LRV 60 vs 52), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms.
Their light reflectance is nearly identical (LRV 60 vs 60), so neither reads brighter in a room.
With LRVs of 60 and 58, the two reflect almost the same amount of light.
Baby's Mittens reflects far more light (LRV 60 vs 27), opening up a space where Denim Drift encloses it.
At LRV 60 vs 43, Baby's Mittens is decisively the brighter choice.
At LRV 60 vs 4, Baby's Mittens is decisively the brighter choice.
Baby's Mittens reads slightly lighter (LRV 60 vs 55), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms.
Baby's Mittens reflects far more light (LRV 60 vs 13), opening up a space where Bancha encloses it.
Baby's Mittens reflects far more light (LRV 60 vs 44), opening up a space where Hardwick White encloses it.
At LRV 84 vs 60, Pure White is decisively the brighter choice.
At LRV 60 vs 21, Baby's Mittens is decisively the brighter choice.
Balboa Mist reads slightly lighter (LRV 66 vs 60), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms.
Shoji White reflects far more light (LRV 74 vs 60), opening up a space where Baby's Mittens encloses it.
Snowbound reflects far more light (LRV 83 vs 60), opening up a space where Baby's Mittens encloses it.
A 10-point LRV gap (60 vs 51) makes Baby's Mittens the marginally brighter of the two.
Baby's Mittens reflects far more light (LRV 60 vs 12), opening up a space where Pewter Green encloses it.
Skimming Stone reads slightly lighter (LRV 68 vs 60), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms.
At LRV 60 vs 41, Baby's Mittens is decisively the brighter choice.
Baby's Mittens reflects far more light (LRV 60 vs 12), opening up a space where Vintage Vogue encloses it.
Baby's Mittens reflects far more light (LRV 60 vs 45), opening up a space where Saybrook Sage encloses it.
At LRV 60 vs 31, Baby's Mittens is decisively the brighter choice.
At LRV 60 vs 7, Baby's Mittens is decisively the brighter choice.