Louisburg Green vs RAL 770-1
Louisburg Green (Benjamin Moore) and RAL 770-1 (RAL Effect) come from different manufacturers. Louisburg Green reads as green-greige, while RAL 770-1 reads as grey — two distinct hue families, not close cousins. Their light reflectance values are nearly the same — 34 vs 32 — so neither will read significantly brighter or darker than the other. A ΔE of 1.8 puts them in subtle territory — distinguishable in direct comparison, less so from across a room. Below you'll find 5 real-room photo comparisons where both colors appear side by side, plus 5 simulated room previews.
Louisburg Green vs RAL 770-1 in Real Spaces
5 real rooms side by side. Louisburg Green and RAL 770-1 are close enough that the difference can be hard to judge from a chip alone — these photos show how each reads at scale, across different spaces and lighting conditions.
Living Room
A living room wall sees more varied light than almost any other surface in the house, which makes the choice between these two more nuanced than a chip suggests. At this scale the difference is subtle — you'd need them side by side, as shown here, to reliably tell them apart.
Bedroom
Bedrooms are typically lit with warmer, lower light than the rest of the house — a condition that flatters warm tones and deepens cool ones. In photos like these you're seeing the difference at its most direct. In a finished room, the distinction is there but not dramatic.
Bathroom
Small bathrooms intensify color. A shade that seems quiet in a larger room can feel immersive when you're surrounded by it on four walls. In photos like these you're seeing the difference at its most direct. In a finished room, the distinction is there but not dramatic.
House
A full exterior is the most demanding test for a paint color — scale and outdoor light both amplify differences that seem small on a swatch. In photos like these you're seeing the difference at its most direct. In a finished room, the distinction is there but not dramatic.
Kitchen Cabinets
Cabinet color is always seen in context — against countertops, backsplash, and hardware — which amplifies undertone differences that might disappear on a plain wall. In photos like these you're seeing the difference at its most direct. In a finished room, the distinction is there but not dramatic.
Color Details
Louisburg Green vs RAL 770-1 Simulated Comparison
5 simulated room previews — drag the slider on each to see Louisburg Green on one side and RAL 770-1 on the other.
Digital color is approximate. These simulations are generated from the manufacturer's hex values and overlaid on grayscale room photos — your screen's calibration, brightness, and viewing angle all affect how they render. Before committing to either color, test physical samples in your own space under the light you actually live with.
More Louisburg Green comparisons
See how Louisburg Green stacks up against other well-photographed colors across different brands and tones.
White Dove reflects far more light (LRV 83 vs 34), opening up a space where Louisburg Green encloses it.
At LRV 69 vs 34, Ammonite is decisively the brighter choice.
Louisburg Green reflects far more light (LRV 34 vs 6), opening up a space where Iron Ore encloses it.
At LRV 52 vs 34, Purbeck Stone is decisively the brighter choice.
A 3-point LRV gap (34 vs 30) makes Louisburg Green the marginally brighter of the two.
Mizzle reflects far more light (LRV 52 vs 34), opening up a space where Louisburg Green encloses it.
At LRV 60 vs 34, Agreeable Gray is decisively the brighter choice.
Accessible Beige reflects far more light (LRV 58 vs 34), opening up a space where Louisburg Green encloses it.
Louisburg Green reads slightly lighter (LRV 34 vs 27), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms.
A 9-point LRV gap (43 vs 34) makes French Gray the marginally brighter of the two.
At LRV 34 vs 4, Louisburg Green is decisively the brighter choice.
Tranquil Dawn reflects far more light (LRV 55 vs 34), opening up a space where Louisburg Green encloses it.
Louisburg Green reflects far more light (LRV 34 vs 13), opening up a space where Bancha encloses it.
Hardwick White reads slightly lighter (LRV 44 vs 34), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms.
At LRV 84 vs 34, Pure White is decisively the brighter choice.
At LRV 34 vs 21, Louisburg Green is decisively the brighter choice.
Balboa Mist reflects far more light (LRV 66 vs 34), opening up a space where Louisburg Green encloses it.
Shoji White reflects far more light (LRV 74 vs 34), opening up a space where Louisburg Green encloses it.
Snowbound reflects far more light (LRV 83 vs 34), opening up a space where Louisburg Green encloses it.
Louisburg Green reflects far more light (LRV 34 vs 12), opening up a space where Pewter Green encloses it.
Skimming Stone reflects far more light (LRV 68 vs 34), opening up a space where Louisburg Green encloses it.
A 7-point LRV gap (41 vs 34) makes Dix Blue the marginally brighter of the two.
At LRV 68 vs 34, Calamine is decisively the brighter choice.
A 9-point LRV gap (34 vs 25) makes Louisburg Green the marginally brighter of the two.
Louisburg Green reflects far more light (LRV 34 vs 12), opening up a space where Vintage Vogue encloses it.
Saybrook Sage reads slightly lighter (LRV 45 vs 34), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms.
Their light reflectance is nearly identical (LRV 34 vs 31), so neither reads brighter in a room.
At LRV 34 vs 7, Louisburg Green is decisively the brighter choice.
A 10-point LRV gap (34 vs 24) makes Louisburg Green the marginally brighter of the two.
At LRV 57 vs 34, Guilford Green is decisively the brighter choice.