Seacliff Heights vs RAL 190-4
Seacliff Heights is a Benjamin Moore color while RAL 190-4 comes from RAL Effect. Seacliff Heights reads as blue-green, while RAL 190-4 reads as blue — two distinct hue families, not close cousins. At LRV 64 vs 58, RAL 190-4 will read as the brighter of the two — a 6-point gap that matters most in north-facing or low-light rooms. At ΔE 5.3, the difference is perceptible but not dramatic — the two can work harmoniously in the same space. Below, 5 simulated room previews show how each color reads at scale — real-room photos will be added as they become available.
Color Details
Seacliff Heights vs RAL 190-4 Simulated Comparison
5 simulated room previews — drag the slider on each to see Seacliff Heights on one side and RAL 190-4 on the other.
Digital color is approximate. These simulations are generated from the manufacturer's hex values and overlaid on grayscale room photos — your screen's calibration, brightness, and viewing angle all affect how they render. Before committing to either color, test physical samples in your own space under the light you actually live with.
More Seacliff Heights comparisons
See how Seacliff Heights stacks up against other well-photographed colors across different brands and tones.
At LRV 83 vs 58, White Dove is decisively the brighter choice.
Ammonite reads slightly lighter (LRV 69 vs 58), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms.
At LRV 58 vs 6, Seacliff Heights is decisively the brighter choice.
Seacliff Heights reads slightly lighter (LRV 58 vs 52), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms.
Seacliff Heights reflects far more light (LRV 58 vs 30), opening up a space where Evergreen Fog encloses it.
A 6-point LRV gap (58 vs 52) makes Seacliff Heights the marginally brighter of the two.
With LRVs of 60 and 58, the two reflect almost the same amount of light.
Their light reflectance is nearly identical (LRV 58 vs 58), so neither reads brighter in a room.
At LRV 58 vs 27, Seacliff Heights is decisively the brighter choice.
Seacliff Heights reflects far more light (LRV 58 vs 43), opening up a space where French Gray encloses it.
Seacliff Heights reflects far more light (LRV 58 vs 4), opening up a space where Naval encloses it.
Their light reflectance is nearly identical (LRV 58 vs 55), so neither reads brighter in a room.
At LRV 58 vs 13, Seacliff Heights is decisively the brighter choice.
At LRV 58 vs 44, Seacliff Heights is decisively the brighter choice.
Pure White reflects far more light (LRV 84 vs 58), opening up a space where Seacliff Heights encloses it.
Seacliff Heights reflects far more light (LRV 58 vs 21), opening up a space where Artichoke encloses it.
A 8-point LRV gap (66 vs 58) makes Balboa Mist the marginally brighter of the two.
At LRV 74 vs 58, Shoji White is decisively the brighter choice.
At LRV 83 vs 58, Snowbound is decisively the brighter choice.
At LRV 58 vs 12, Seacliff Heights is decisively the brighter choice.
A 11-point LRV gap (68 vs 58) makes Skimming Stone the marginally brighter of the two.
Seacliff Heights reflects far more light (LRV 58 vs 41), opening up a space where Dix Blue encloses it.
Calamine reads slightly lighter (LRV 68 vs 58), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms.
Seacliff Heights reflects far more light (LRV 58 vs 25), opening up a space where Treron encloses it.
At LRV 58 vs 12, Seacliff Heights is decisively the brighter choice.
At LRV 58 vs 45, Seacliff Heights is decisively the brighter choice.
Seacliff Heights reflects far more light (LRV 58 vs 31), opening up a space where Pale Green encloses it.
Seacliff Heights reflects far more light (LRV 58 vs 7), opening up a space where Pine Needle encloses it.
Seacliff Heights reflects far more light (LRV 58 vs 24), opening up a space where Cement grey encloses it.
With LRVs of 58 and 57, the two reflect almost the same amount of light.