Pale Taupe vs Big Chill
Pale Taupe (Dulux) and Big Chill (Sherwin-Williams) come from different manufacturers. Pale Taupe reads as greige-grey, while Big Chill reads as grey — two distinct hue families, not close cousins. Their light reflectance values are nearly the same — 63 vs 62 — so neither will read significantly brighter or darker than the other. Where Pale Taupe leans warm, Big Chill reads neutral — a distinction that shifts noticeably depending on the light source and surrounding finishes. A ΔE of 1.6 puts them in subtle territory — distinguishable in direct comparison, less so from across a room. Below you'll find 1 real-room photo comparison where both colors appear side by side, plus 5 simulated room previews.
Pale Taupe vs Big Chill in Real Spaces
1 real room side by side. Pale Taupe and Big Chill are close enough that the difference can be hard to judge from a chip alone — these photos show how each reads at scale, across different spaces and lighting conditions.
Bedroom
Bedrooms are typically lit with warmer, lower light than the rest of the house — a condition that flatters warm tones and deepens cool ones. Big Chill reads more restrained here, while Pale Taupe adds a sense of enclosure and warmth.
Color Details
Pale Taupe vs Big Chill Simulated Comparison
5 simulated room previews — drag the slider on each to see Pale Taupe on one side and Big Chill on the other.
Digital color is approximate. These simulations are generated from the manufacturer's hex values and overlaid on grayscale room photos — your screen's calibration, brightness, and viewing angle all affect how they render. Before committing to either color, test physical samples in your own space under the light you actually live with.
More Pale Taupe comparisons
See how Pale Taupe stacks up against other well-photographed colors across different brands and tones.
Ammonite reads slightly lighter (LRV 69 vs 63), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms.
At LRV 83 vs 63, White Dove is decisively the brighter choice.
At LRV 63 vs 6, Pale Taupe is decisively the brighter choice.
Pale Taupe reads slightly lighter (LRV 63 vs 52), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms.
Pale Taupe reflects far more light (LRV 63 vs 30), opening up a space where Evergreen Fog encloses it.
A 11-point LRV gap (63 vs 52) makes Pale Taupe the marginally brighter of the two.
With LRVs of 63 and 60, the two reflect almost the same amount of light.
A 5-point LRV gap (63 vs 58) makes Pale Taupe the marginally brighter of the two.
At LRV 63 vs 27, Pale Taupe is decisively the brighter choice.
Pale Taupe reflects far more light (LRV 63 vs 43), opening up a space where French Gray encloses it.
Pale Taupe reflects far more light (LRV 63 vs 4), opening up a space where Naval encloses it.
A 8-point LRV gap (63 vs 55) makes Pale Taupe the marginally brighter of the two.
At LRV 63 vs 13, Pale Taupe is decisively the brighter choice.
At LRV 63 vs 44, Pale Taupe is decisively the brighter choice.
Pure White reflects far more light (LRV 84 vs 63), opening up a space where Pale Taupe encloses it.
Pale Taupe reflects far more light (LRV 63 vs 21), opening up a space where Artichoke encloses it.
Their light reflectance is nearly identical (LRV 66 vs 63), so neither reads brighter in a room.
A 11-point LRV gap (74 vs 63) makes Shoji White the marginally brighter of the two.
At LRV 83 vs 63, Snowbound is decisively the brighter choice.
Pale Taupe reflects far more light (LRV 63 vs 51), opening up a space where Pigeon encloses it.
At LRV 63 vs 12, Pale Taupe is decisively the brighter choice.
At LRV 63 vs 8, Pale Taupe is decisively the brighter choice.
A 5-point LRV gap (68 vs 63) makes Skimming Stone the marginally brighter of the two.
Pale Taupe reflects far more light (LRV 63 vs 41), opening up a space where Dix Blue encloses it.
At LRV 63 vs 12, Pale Taupe is decisively the brighter choice.
At LRV 63 vs 45, Pale Taupe is decisively the brighter choice.
Pale Taupe reflects far more light (LRV 63 vs 31), opening up a space where Pale Green encloses it.