Cooking Apple Green vs Mizzle

Cooking Apple GreenFarrow & BallvsMizzleFarrow & BallΔE 9.6Noticeable difference

Both from Farrow & Ball's palette. Cooking Apple Green reads as beige-green, while Mizzle reads as grey — two distinct hue families, not close cousins. They have nearly identical light reflectance values (54 vs 52), so they'll read as similarly Medium in most lighting conditions. Both lean warm, so they'll behave similarly in mixed or changing light conditions. The ΔE 9.6 gap is real but not dramatic — close enough to use together, distinct enough to matter as a choice. Below you'll find 8 real-room photo comparisons where both colors appear side by side, plus 5 simulated room previews.

Cooking Apple Green vs Mizzle in Real Spaces

8 real rooms side by side. Cooking Apple Green and Mizzle are close enough that the difference can be hard to judge from a chip alone — these photos show how each reads at scale, across different spaces and lighting conditions.

Living Room

In a living room, color works across both daylight and evening light — the same wall can read very differently at noon and at 8pm. Side by side like this, the difference is easy to read — which is exactly why seeing them in a real space is more useful than comparing chips.

Cooking Apple GreenCooking Apple Green living room color review

@helenas.home.reno

MizzleFarrow and Ball Mizzle living room fireplace color review

@wherelucelives

Bedroom

The context that matters most in a bedroom is how a color reads under a bedside lamp at night, not under noon daylight. The distinction reads clearly at room scale, making the choice between them concrete.

Cooking Apple GreenFarrow and Ball Cooking Apple Green bedroom accent wall

@georgian_townhouse_oxton

MizzleFarrow and Ball Mizzle bedroom interior idea

@maggiel_interiors

Kitchen

In a kitchen, colors are seen under bright task lighting that amplifies undertones — what reads neutral elsewhere can show its hand here. The distinction reads clearly at room scale, making the choice between them concrete.

MizzleMizzle kitchen picture

@lifeat_rosecottage

Dining Room

A dining room lit by a dimmed pendant or candles is one of the most forgiving environments for paint — warm light softens almost everything. At this scale, the choice between them becomes clear in a way that a swatch alone can't communicate.

MizzleMizzle dining room color

@renovatingrosedale

Bathroom

Bathrooms are one of the few spaces where you're genuinely enclosed by the paint color, which makes the choice between these two more consequential. The distinction reads clearly at room scale, making the choice between them concrete.

Cooking Apple GreenFarrow and Ball Cooking Apple Green bathroom review

@lrminteriors_

MizzleFarrow and Ball Mizzle bathroom paint

@altongtaylorwimpey

House

Seen across an entire facade, subtle tonal differences become pronounced. What reads as nearly the same on a chip often reads as clearly different at scale. The distinction reads clearly at room scale, making the choice between them concrete.

Cooking Apple GreenCooking Apple Green exterior paint

@boushamgallery

MizzleFarrow and Ball 266 house exterior color

@the_interior_mama

Front Door

A front door is a focal point — small color differences read clearly at this concentrated scale. Side by side like this, the difference is easy to read — which is exactly why seeing them in a real space is more useful than comparing chips.

Cooking Apple GreenCooking Apple Green front door review

@moulder_joinery

MizzleFarrow and Ball 266 front door picture

@oldhallcottage

Kitchen Cabinets

Kitchen cabinets are constantly compared against adjacent materials, which means subtle differences between these two become much more visible. The distinction reads clearly at room scale, making the choice between them concrete.

Cooking Apple GreenCooking Apple Green kitchen cabinets paint review

@lemarchantdesigns

MizzleFarrow and Ball 266 kitchen cabinets picture

@kinghamdesign

Color Details

Cooking Apple Green
Farrow & Ball · 32
Hex#c4c6a5
LRV53.7
BrandFarrow & Ball
Number32
Undertone
TemperatureWarm
BrightnessMedium
Mizzle
Farrow & Ball · 266
Hex#c0c2b3
LRV51.6
BrandFarrow & Ball
Number266
Undertone
TemperatureWarm
BrightnessMedium

Cooking Apple Green vs Mizzle Simulated Comparison

5 simulated room previews — drag the slider on each to see Cooking Apple Green on one side and Mizzle on the other.

Bathroom
Bedroom
House
Kitchen Cabinets
Living Room

Digital color is approximate. These simulations are generated from the manufacturer's hex values and overlaid on grayscale room photos — your screen's calibration, brightness, and viewing angle all affect how they render. Before committing to either color, test physical samples in your own space under the light you actually live with.

More Cooking Apple Green comparisons

See how Cooking Apple Green stacks up against other well-photographed colors across different brands and tones.

White Dove
Cooking Apple Green
White Dove
Cooking Apple Green

White Dove reflects far more light (LRV 83 vs 54), opening up a space where Cooking Apple Green encloses it.

Ammonite
Cooking Apple Green
Ammonite
Cooking Apple Green
Farrow & Ball
Ammonite
LRV 69

At LRV 69 vs 54, Ammonite is decisively the brighter choice.

Cooking Apple Green
Iron Ore
Cooking Apple Green
Iron Ore

Cooking Apple Green reflects far more light (LRV 54 vs 6), opening up a space where Iron Ore encloses it.

Cooking Apple Green
Purbeck Stone
Cooking Apple Green
Purbeck Stone

Their light reflectance is nearly identical (LRV 54 vs 52), so neither reads brighter in a room.

Cooking Apple Green
Evergreen Fog
Cooking Apple Green
Evergreen Fog

At LRV 54 vs 30, Cooking Apple Green is decisively the brighter choice.

Cooking Apple Green
Agreeable Gray
Cooking Apple Green
Agreeable Gray

A 7-point LRV gap (60 vs 54) makes Agreeable Gray the marginally brighter of the two.

Cooking Apple Green
Accessible Beige
Cooking Apple Green
Accessible Beige

Accessible Beige reads slightly lighter (LRV 58 vs 54), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms.

Denim Drift
Cooking Apple Green
Denim Drift
Cooking Apple Green

Cooking Apple Green reflects far more light (LRV 54 vs 27), opening up a space where Denim Drift encloses it.

Cooking Apple Green
French Gray
Cooking Apple Green
French Gray

A 10-point LRV gap (54 vs 43) makes Cooking Apple Green the marginally brighter of the two.

Cooking Apple Green
Naval
Cooking Apple Green
Naval
Sherwin-Williams
Naval
LRV 4

At LRV 54 vs 4, Cooking Apple Green is decisively the brighter choice.

Tranquil Dawn
Cooking Apple Green
Tranquil Dawn
Cooking Apple Green

With LRVs of 55 and 54, the two reflect almost the same amount of light.

Bancha
Cooking Apple Green
Bancha
Cooking Apple Green
Farrow & Ball
Bancha
LRV 13

Cooking Apple Green reflects far more light (LRV 54 vs 13), opening up a space where Bancha encloses it.

Cooking Apple Green
Hardwick White
Cooking Apple Green
Hardwick White

Cooking Apple Green reads slightly lighter (LRV 54 vs 44), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms.

Cooking Apple Green
Pure White
Cooking Apple Green
Pure White

At LRV 84 vs 54, Pure White is decisively the brighter choice.

Cooking Apple Green
Artichoke
Cooking Apple Green
Artichoke
Sherwin-Williams
Artichoke
LRV 21

At LRV 54 vs 21, Cooking Apple Green is decisively the brighter choice.

Balboa Mist
Cooking Apple Green
Balboa Mist
Cooking Apple Green

Balboa Mist reads slightly lighter (LRV 66 vs 54), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms.

Cooking Apple Green
Shoji White
Cooking Apple Green
Shoji White

Shoji White reflects far more light (LRV 74 vs 54), opening up a space where Cooking Apple Green encloses it.

Cooking Apple Green
Snowbound
Cooking Apple Green
Snowbound
Sherwin-Williams
Snowbound
LRV 83

Snowbound reflects far more light (LRV 83 vs 54), opening up a space where Cooking Apple Green encloses it.

Cooking Apple Green
Pewter Green
Cooking Apple Green
Pewter Green

Cooking Apple Green reflects far more light (LRV 54 vs 12), opening up a space where Pewter Green encloses it.

Cooking Apple Green
Skimming Stone
Cooking Apple Green
Skimming Stone

Skimming Stone reflects far more light (LRV 68 vs 54), opening up a space where Cooking Apple Green encloses it.

Cooking Apple Green
Dix Blue
Cooking Apple Green
Dix Blue
Farrow & Ball
Dix Blue
LRV 41

At LRV 54 vs 41, Cooking Apple Green is decisively the brighter choice.

Calamine
Cooking Apple Green
Calamine
Cooking Apple Green
Farrow & Ball
Calamine
LRV 68

At LRV 68 vs 54, Calamine is decisively the brighter choice.

Cooking Apple Green
Treron
Cooking Apple Green
Treron
Farrow & Ball
Treron
LRV 25

At LRV 54 vs 25, Cooking Apple Green is decisively the brighter choice.

Vintage Vogue
Cooking Apple Green
Vintage Vogue
Cooking Apple Green

Cooking Apple Green reflects far more light (LRV 54 vs 12), opening up a space where Vintage Vogue encloses it.

Saybrook Sage
Cooking Apple Green
Saybrook Sage
Cooking Apple Green

Cooking Apple Green reads slightly lighter (LRV 54 vs 45), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms.

Cooking Apple Green
Pale Green
Cooking Apple Green
Pale Green
RAL ClassicClassic
Pale Green
LRV 31

At LRV 54 vs 31, Cooking Apple Green is decisively the brighter choice.

Pine Needle
Cooking Apple Green
Pine Needle
Cooking Apple Green

At LRV 54 vs 7, Cooking Apple Green is decisively the brighter choice.

Cooking Apple Green
Cement grey
Cooking Apple Green
Cement grey
RAL ClassicClassic
Cement grey
LRV 24

At LRV 54 vs 24, Cooking Apple Green is decisively the brighter choice.

Guilford Green
Cooking Apple Green
Guilford Green vs Cooking Apple Green
Guilford Green
Cooking Apple Green

A 4-point LRV gap (57 vs 54) makes Guilford Green the marginally brighter of the two.

Just Walnut
Cooking Apple Green
Just Walnut
Cooking Apple Green

At LRV 72 vs 54, Just Walnut is decisively the brighter choice.