Cooking Apple Green vs Romaine
Cooking Apple Green is a Farrow & Ball color while Romaine comes from Sherwin-Williams. Hue-wise, Cooking Apple Green belongs to the beige-green family and Romaine to the green-yellow family. At LRV 60 vs 54, Romaine will read as the brighter of the two — a 7-point gap that matters most in north-facing or low-light rooms. The tonal difference — Cooking Apple Green's warm character against Romaine's neutral — becomes most visible against white trim or in morning light. At ΔE 7.1, the difference is perceptible but not dramatic — the two can work harmoniously in the same space. Below, 5 simulated room previews show how each color reads at scale — real-room photos will be added as they become available.
Color Details
Cooking Apple Green vs Romaine Simulated Comparison
5 simulated room previews — drag the slider on each to see Cooking Apple Green on one side and Romaine on the other.
Digital color is approximate. These simulations are generated from the manufacturer's hex values and overlaid on grayscale room photos — your screen's calibration, brightness, and viewing angle all affect how they render. Before committing to either color, test physical samples in your own space under the light you actually live with.
More Cooking Apple Green comparisons
See how Cooking Apple Green stacks up against other well-photographed colors across different brands and tones.
At LRV 69 vs 54, Ammonite is decisively the brighter choice.
White Dove reflects far more light (LRV 83 vs 54), opening up a space where Cooking Apple Green encloses it.
Cooking Apple Green reflects far more light (LRV 54 vs 6), opening up a space where Iron Ore encloses it.
Their light reflectance is nearly identical (LRV 54 vs 52), so neither reads brighter in a room.
At LRV 54 vs 30, Cooking Apple Green is decisively the brighter choice.
With LRVs of 54 and 52, the two reflect almost the same amount of light.
A 7-point LRV gap (60 vs 54) makes Agreeable Gray the marginally brighter of the two.
Accessible Beige reads slightly lighter (LRV 58 vs 54), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms.
Cooking Apple Green reflects far more light (LRV 54 vs 27), opening up a space where Denim Drift encloses it.
A 10-point LRV gap (54 vs 43) makes Cooking Apple Green the marginally brighter of the two.
At LRV 54 vs 4, Cooking Apple Green is decisively the brighter choice.
With LRVs of 55 and 54, the two reflect almost the same amount of light.
Cooking Apple Green reflects far more light (LRV 54 vs 13), opening up a space where Bancha encloses it.
Cooking Apple Green reads slightly lighter (LRV 54 vs 44), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms.
At LRV 84 vs 54, Pure White is decisively the brighter choice.
At LRV 54 vs 21, Cooking Apple Green is decisively the brighter choice.
Balboa Mist reads slightly lighter (LRV 66 vs 54), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms.
Shoji White reflects far more light (LRV 74 vs 54), opening up a space where Cooking Apple Green encloses it.
Snowbound reflects far more light (LRV 83 vs 54), opening up a space where Cooking Apple Green encloses it.
A 3-point LRV gap (54 vs 51) makes Cooking Apple Green the marginally brighter of the two.
Cooking Apple Green reflects far more light (LRV 54 vs 12), opening up a space where Pewter Green encloses it.
Cooking Apple Green reflects far more light (LRV 54 vs 8), opening up a space where Duck Green encloses it.
Skimming Stone reflects far more light (LRV 68 vs 54), opening up a space where Cooking Apple Green encloses it.
At LRV 54 vs 41, Cooking Apple Green is decisively the brighter choice.
Cooking Apple Green reflects far more light (LRV 54 vs 12), opening up a space where Vintage Vogue encloses it.
Cooking Apple Green reads slightly lighter (LRV 54 vs 45), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms.
At LRV 54 vs 31, Cooking Apple Green is decisively the brighter choice.