RAL 170-4 vs Breathtaking
RAL 170-4 (RAL Effect) and Breathtaking (Sherwin-Williams) come from different manufacturers. These are both blues, so the question isn't which hue to choose — it's where within blue to land. The 6-point LRV gap — 69 for RAL 170-4 vs 63 for Breathtaking — means RAL 170-4 will open up a space more effectively. ΔE 3.5 means they're clearly different, but not dramatically so — they'd pair well in the same room. Below you'll find 1 real-room photo comparison where both colors appear side by side, plus 5 simulated room previews.
RAL 170-4 vs Breathtaking in Real Spaces
1 real room side by side. RAL 170-4 and Breathtaking are close enough that the difference can be hard to judge from a chip alone — these photos show how each reads at scale, across different spaces and lighting conditions.
Bedroom
Bedrooms are typically lit with warmer, lower light than the rest of the house — a condition that flatters warm tones and deepens cool ones. RAL 170-4 has the edge in reflectance, which shows as a quiet sense of added space rather than an obvious contrast.
Color Details
RAL 170-4 vs Breathtaking Simulated Comparison
5 simulated room previews — drag the slider on each to see RAL 170-4 on one side and Breathtaking on the other.
Digital color is approximate. These simulations are generated from the manufacturer's hex values and overlaid on grayscale room photos — your screen's calibration, brightness, and viewing angle all affect how they render. Before committing to either color, test physical samples in your own space under the light you actually live with.
More RAL 170-4 comparisons
See how RAL 170-4 stacks up against other well-photographed colors across different brands and tones.
