RAL 210-5 vs Fleeting Green
Where RAL 210-5 belongs to RAL Effect's range, Fleeting Green is a Sherwin-Williams color. Hue-wise, RAL 210-5 belongs to the green family and Fleeting Green to the green-grey family. They have nearly identical light reflectance values (76 vs 74), so they'll read as similarly Light in most lighting conditions. At ΔE 2.9, these are close — the kind of difference that matters when choosing between them, but doesn't read strongly in a finished room. Below you'll find 2 real-room photo comparisons where both colors appear side by side, plus 5 simulated room previews.
RAL 210-5 vs Fleeting Green in Real Spaces
2 real rooms side by side. RAL 210-5 and Fleeting Green are close enough that the difference can be hard to judge from a chip alone — these photos show how each reads at scale, across different spaces and lighting conditions.
Bedroom
The context that matters most in a bedroom is how a color reads under a bedside lamp at night, not under noon daylight. At this scale the difference is subtle — you'd need them side by side, as shown here, to reliably tell them apart.
Bathroom
Bathrooms are one of the few spaces where you're genuinely enclosed by the paint color, which makes the choice between these two more consequential. At this scale the difference is subtle — you'd need them side by side, as shown here, to reliably tell them apart.
Color Details
RAL 210-5 vs Fleeting Green Simulated Comparison
5 simulated room previews — drag the slider on each to see RAL 210-5 on one side and Fleeting Green on the other.
Digital color is approximate. These simulations are generated from the manufacturer's hex values and overlaid on grayscale room photos — your screen's calibration, brightness, and viewing angle all affect how they render. Before committing to either color, test physical samples in your own space under the light you actually live with.
More RAL 210-5 comparisons
See how RAL 210-5 stacks up against other well-photographed colors across different brands and tones.
A 7-point LRV gap (83 vs 76) makes White Dove the marginally brighter of the two.
RAL 210-5 reflects far more light (LRV 76 vs 52), opening up a space where Purbeck Stone encloses it.
RAL 210-5 reflects far more light (LRV 76 vs 30), opening up a space where Evergreen Fog encloses it.
RAL 210-5 reflects far more light (LRV 76 vs 60), opening up a space where Agreeable Gray encloses it.
At LRV 76 vs 58, RAL 210-5 is decisively the brighter choice.
At LRV 76 vs 27, RAL 210-5 is decisively the brighter choice.
RAL 210-5 reflects far more light (LRV 76 vs 43), opening up a space where French Gray encloses it.
At LRV 76 vs 55, RAL 210-5 is decisively the brighter choice.
At LRV 76 vs 44, RAL 210-5 is decisively the brighter choice.
Pure White reads slightly lighter (LRV 84 vs 76), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms.
A 11-point LRV gap (76 vs 66) makes RAL 210-5 the marginally brighter of the two.
Their light reflectance is nearly identical (LRV 76 vs 74), so neither reads brighter in a room.
At LRV 76 vs 12, RAL 210-5 is decisively the brighter choice.
A 8-point LRV gap (76 vs 68) makes RAL 210-5 the marginally brighter of the two.
At LRV 76 vs 12, RAL 210-5 is decisively the brighter choice.
At LRV 76 vs 45, RAL 210-5 is decisively the brighter choice.
RAL 210-5 reflects far more light (LRV 76 vs 31), opening up a space where Pale Green encloses it.
RAL 210-5 reflects far more light (LRV 76 vs 7), opening up a space where Pine Needle encloses it.
RAL 210-5 reflects far more light (LRV 76 vs 24), opening up a space where Cement grey encloses it.
RAL 210-5 reflects far more light (LRV 76 vs 57), opening up a space where Guilford Green encloses it.