RAL 240-1 vs Dancing Green
Where RAL 240-1 belongs to RAL Effect's range, Dancing Green is a Sherwin-Williams color. Hue-wise, RAL 240-1 belongs to the beige-yellow family and Dancing Green to the green-yellow family. RAL 240-1 (LRV 63) reflects noticeably more light than Dancing Green (LRV 58), a difference of 5 points that becomes especially apparent in rooms with limited natural light. The ΔE 7.8 gap is real but not dramatic — close enough to use together, distinct enough to matter as a choice. Below you'll find 1 real-room photo comparison where both colors appear side by side, plus 5 simulated room previews.
RAL 240-1 vs Dancing Green in Real Spaces
1 real room side by side. RAL 240-1 and Dancing Green are close enough that the difference can be hard to judge from a chip alone — these photos show how each reads at scale, across different spaces and lighting conditions.
Living Room
In a living room, color works across both daylight and evening light — the same wall can read very differently at noon and at 8pm. The brightness difference is modest but present — RAL 240-1 gives the walls a little more lift.
Color Details
RAL 240-1 vs Dancing Green Simulated Comparison
5 simulated room previews — drag the slider on each to see RAL 240-1 on one side and Dancing Green on the other.
Digital color is approximate. These simulations are generated from the manufacturer's hex values and overlaid on grayscale room photos — your screen's calibration, brightness, and viewing angle all affect how they render. Before committing to either color, test physical samples in your own space under the light you actually live with.
More RAL 240-1 comparisons
See how RAL 240-1 stacks up against other well-photographed colors across different brands and tones.
White Dove reflects far more light (LRV 83 vs 63), opening up a space where RAL 240-1 encloses it.
A 11-point LRV gap (63 vs 52) makes RAL 240-1 the marginally brighter of the two.
At LRV 63 vs 30, RAL 240-1 is decisively the brighter choice.
Their light reflectance is nearly identical (LRV 63 vs 60), so neither reads brighter in a room.
RAL 240-1 reads slightly lighter (LRV 63 vs 58), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms.
RAL 240-1 reflects far more light (LRV 63 vs 27), opening up a space where Denim Drift encloses it.
At LRV 63 vs 43, RAL 240-1 is decisively the brighter choice.
RAL 240-1 reads slightly lighter (LRV 63 vs 55), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms.
RAL 240-1 reflects far more light (LRV 63 vs 44), opening up a space where Hardwick White encloses it.
At LRV 84 vs 63, Pure White is decisively the brighter choice.
With LRVs of 66 and 63, the two reflect almost the same amount of light.
Shoji White reads slightly lighter (LRV 74 vs 63), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms.
RAL 240-1 reflects far more light (LRV 63 vs 12), opening up a space where Pewter Green encloses it.
Skimming Stone reads slightly lighter (LRV 68 vs 63), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms.
RAL 240-1 reflects far more light (LRV 63 vs 12), opening up a space where Vintage Vogue encloses it.
RAL 240-1 reflects far more light (LRV 63 vs 45), opening up a space where Saybrook Sage encloses it.
At LRV 63 vs 31, RAL 240-1 is decisively the brighter choice.
At LRV 63 vs 7, RAL 240-1 is decisively the brighter choice.
At LRV 63 vs 24, RAL 240-1 is decisively the brighter choice.
A 6-point LRV gap (63 vs 57) makes RAL 240-1 the marginally brighter of the two.