RAL 240-1 vs Gleeful
RAL 240-1 is a RAL Effect color while Gleeful comes from Sherwin-Williams. Both sit in the beige-yellow family, which is useful context if you're narrowing within a single hue direction. At LRV 66 vs 63, Gleeful will read as the brighter of the two — a 3-point gap that matters most in north-facing or low-light rooms. With a ΔE of 1.5, the difference is subtle — you'd need them side by side to reliably tell them apart. Below you'll find 5 real-room photo comparisons where both colors appear side by side, plus 5 simulated room previews.
RAL 240-1 vs Gleeful in Real Spaces
5 real rooms side by side. RAL 240-1 and Gleeful are close enough that the difference can be hard to judge from a chip alone — these photos show how each reads at scale, across different spaces and lighting conditions.
Living Room
Living rooms test a color across a full range of conditions — morning sun, afternoon shade, and evening lamp light all shift how both of these read. In photos like these you're seeing the difference at its most direct. In a finished room, the distinction is there but not dramatic.
Bedroom
Bedroom walls are often seen under warm artificial light, a context that shifts both colors from how they look on a chip. The two are close enough that the choice comes down to finer qualities — undertone, texture, what the color sits next to.
Kitchen
Kitchen lighting tends to be bright and directional, which sharpens contrast and makes undertone differences more apparent. The two are close enough that the choice comes down to finer qualities — undertone, texture, what the color sits next to.
Bathroom
Bathrooms amplify color — the enclosed space and reflective surfaces make what reads subtle elsewhere feel more present here. The two are close enough that the choice comes down to finer qualities — undertone, texture, what the color sits next to.
Color Details
RAL 240-1 vs Gleeful Simulated Comparison
5 simulated room previews — drag the slider on each to see RAL 240-1 on one side and Gleeful on the other.
Digital color is approximate. These simulations are generated from the manufacturer's hex values and overlaid on grayscale room photos — your screen's calibration, brightness, and viewing angle all affect how they render. Before committing to either color, test physical samples in your own space under the light you actually live with.
More RAL 240-1 comparisons
See how RAL 240-1 stacks up against other well-photographed colors across different brands and tones.
White Dove reflects far more light (LRV 83 vs 63), opening up a space where RAL 240-1 encloses it.
A 11-point LRV gap (63 vs 52) makes RAL 240-1 the marginally brighter of the two.
At LRV 63 vs 30, RAL 240-1 is decisively the brighter choice.
Their light reflectance is nearly identical (LRV 63 vs 60), so neither reads brighter in a room.
RAL 240-1 reads slightly lighter (LRV 63 vs 58), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms.
RAL 240-1 reflects far more light (LRV 63 vs 27), opening up a space where Denim Drift encloses it.
At LRV 63 vs 43, RAL 240-1 is decisively the brighter choice.
RAL 240-1 reads slightly lighter (LRV 63 vs 55), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms.
RAL 240-1 reflects far more light (LRV 63 vs 44), opening up a space where Hardwick White encloses it.
At LRV 84 vs 63, Pure White is decisively the brighter choice.
With LRVs of 66 and 63, the two reflect almost the same amount of light.
Shoji White reads slightly lighter (LRV 74 vs 63), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms.
RAL 240-1 reflects far more light (LRV 63 vs 12), opening up a space where Pewter Green encloses it.
RAL 240-1 reflects far more light (LRV 63 vs 8), opening up a space where Duck Green encloses it.
Skimming Stone reads slightly lighter (LRV 68 vs 63), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms.
RAL 240-1 reflects far more light (LRV 63 vs 12), opening up a space where Vintage Vogue encloses it.
RAL 240-1 reflects far more light (LRV 63 vs 45), opening up a space where Saybrook Sage encloses it.
At LRV 63 vs 31, RAL 240-1 is decisively the brighter choice.