RAL 490-2 vs Comical Coral
Where RAL 490-2 belongs to RAL Effect's range, Comical Coral is a Sherwin-Williams color. Both sit in the pink-red family, which is useful context if you're narrowing within a single hue direction. They have nearly identical light reflectance values (68 vs 69), so they'll read as similarly Light in most lighting conditions. The ΔE 4.6 gap is real but not dramatic — close enough to use together, distinct enough to matter as a choice. Below you'll find 4 real-room photo comparisons where both colors appear side by side, plus 5 simulated room previews.
RAL 490-2 vs Comical Coral in Real Spaces
4 real rooms side by side. RAL 490-2 and Comical Coral are close enough that the difference can be hard to judge from a chip alone — these photos show how each reads at scale, across different spaces and lighting conditions.
Living Room
In a living room, color works across both daylight and evening light — the same wall can read very differently at noon and at 8pm. Side by side like this, the difference is easy to read — which is exactly why seeing them in a real space is more useful than comparing chips.
Bedroom
The context that matters most in a bedroom is how a color reads under a bedside lamp at night, not under noon daylight. The distinction reads clearly at room scale, making the choice between them concrete.
Kitchen
In a kitchen, colors are seen under bright task lighting that amplifies undertones — what reads neutral elsewhere can show its hand here. The distinction reads clearly at room scale, making the choice between them concrete.
Bathroom
Bathrooms are one of the few spaces where you're genuinely enclosed by the paint color, which makes the choice between these two more consequential. The distinction reads clearly at room scale, making the choice between them concrete.
Color Details
RAL 490-2 vs Comical Coral Simulated Comparison
5 simulated room previews — drag the slider on each to see RAL 490-2 on one side and Comical Coral on the other.
Digital color is approximate. These simulations are generated from the manufacturer's hex values and overlaid on grayscale room photos — your screen's calibration, brightness, and viewing angle all affect how they render. Before committing to either color, test physical samples in your own space under the light you actually live with.
More RAL 490-2 comparisons
See how RAL 490-2 stacks up against other well-photographed colors across different brands and tones.
White Dove reflects far more light (LRV 83 vs 68), opening up a space where RAL 490-2 encloses it.
At LRV 68 vs 52, RAL 490-2 is decisively the brighter choice.
At LRV 68 vs 30, RAL 490-2 is decisively the brighter choice.
A 7-point LRV gap (68 vs 60) makes RAL 490-2 the marginally brighter of the two.
RAL 490-2 reads slightly lighter (LRV 68 vs 58), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms.
RAL 490-2 reflects far more light (LRV 68 vs 27), opening up a space where Denim Drift encloses it.
At LRV 68 vs 43, RAL 490-2 is decisively the brighter choice.
RAL 490-2 reflects far more light (LRV 68 vs 55), opening up a space where Tranquil Dawn encloses it.
RAL 490-2 reflects far more light (LRV 68 vs 44), opening up a space where Hardwick White encloses it.
At LRV 84 vs 68, Pure White is decisively the brighter choice.
With LRVs of 68 and 66, the two reflect almost the same amount of light.
Shoji White reads slightly lighter (LRV 74 vs 68), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms.
RAL 490-2 reflects far more light (LRV 68 vs 12), opening up a space where Pewter Green encloses it.
With LRVs of 68 and 68, the two reflect almost the same amount of light.
RAL 490-2 reflects far more light (LRV 68 vs 12), opening up a space where Vintage Vogue encloses it.
RAL 490-2 reflects far more light (LRV 68 vs 45), opening up a space where Saybrook Sage encloses it.
At LRV 68 vs 31, RAL 490-2 is decisively the brighter choice.
At LRV 68 vs 7, RAL 490-2 is decisively the brighter choice.
At LRV 68 vs 24, RAL 490-2 is decisively the brighter choice.
A 10-point LRV gap (68 vs 57) makes RAL 490-2 the marginally brighter of the two.