
RAL 680-2 vs Cruising
RAL 680-2 (RAL Effect) and Cruising (Sherwin-Williams) come from different manufacturers. These are both blues, so the question isn't which hue to choose — it's where within blue to land. Their light reflectance values are nearly the same — 18 vs 19 — so neither will read significantly brighter or darker than the other. ΔE 5.4 means they're clearly different, but not dramatically so — they'd pair well in the same room. Below you'll find 5 real-room photo comparisons where both colors appear side by side, plus 5 simulated room previews.
RAL 680-2 vs Cruising in Real Spaces
5 real rooms side by side. RAL 680-2 and Cruising are close enough that the difference can be hard to judge from a chip alone — these photos show how each reads at scale, across different spaces and lighting conditions.
Living Room
A living room wall sees more varied light than almost any other surface in the house, which makes the choice between these two more nuanced than a chip suggests. The distinction reads clearly at room scale, making the choice between them concrete.
Bedroom
Bedrooms are typically lit with warmer, lower light than the rest of the house — a condition that flatters warm tones and deepens cool ones. At this scale, the choice between them becomes clear in a way that a swatch alone can't communicate.
Kitchen
Kitchens often have the harshest, most revealing light in the house — under-cabinet LEDs and overhead fixtures that strip away subtlety. At this scale, the choice between them becomes clear in a way that a swatch alone can't communicate.
Bathroom
Small bathrooms intensify color. A shade that seems quiet in a larger room can feel immersive when you're surrounded by it on four walls. At this scale, the choice between them becomes clear in a way that a swatch alone can't communicate.
Color Details
RAL 680-2 vs Cruising Simulated Comparison
5 simulated room previews — drag the slider on each to see RAL 680-2 on one side and Cruising on the other.
Digital color is approximate. These simulations are generated from the manufacturer's hex values and overlaid on grayscale room photos — your screen's calibration, brightness, and viewing angle all affect how they render. Before committing to either color, test physical samples in your own space under the light you actually live with.
More RAL 680-2 comparisons
See how RAL 680-2 stacks up against other well-photographed colors across different brands and tones.


At LRV 83 vs 18, White Dove is decisively the brighter choice.


Purbeck Stone reflects far more light (LRV 52 vs 18), opening up a space where RAL 680-2 encloses it.


Evergreen Fog reflects far more light (LRV 30 vs 18), opening up a space where RAL 680-2 encloses it.


Agreeable Gray reflects far more light (LRV 60 vs 18), opening up a space where RAL 680-2 encloses it.


At LRV 58 vs 18, Accessible Beige is decisively the brighter choice.


A 9-point LRV gap (27 vs 18) makes Denim Drift the marginally brighter of the two.


French Gray reflects far more light (LRV 43 vs 18), opening up a space where RAL 680-2 encloses it.


At LRV 55 vs 18, Tranquil Dawn is decisively the brighter choice.


At LRV 44 vs 18, Hardwick White is decisively the brighter choice.


Pure White reflects far more light (LRV 84 vs 18), opening up a space where RAL 680-2 encloses it.


At LRV 66 vs 18, Balboa Mist is decisively the brighter choice.


At LRV 74 vs 18, Shoji White is decisively the brighter choice.


A 6-point LRV gap (18 vs 12) makes RAL 680-2 the marginally brighter of the two.


A 10-point LRV gap (18 vs 8) makes RAL 680-2 the marginally brighter of the two.


At LRV 68 vs 18, Skimming Stone is decisively the brighter choice.


A 6-point LRV gap (18 vs 12) makes RAL 680-2 the marginally brighter of the two.


At LRV 45 vs 18, Saybrook Sage is decisively the brighter choice.


Pale Green reflects far more light (LRV 31 vs 18), opening up a space where RAL 680-2 encloses it.































