RAL 780-2 vs Evergreen Fog
Where RAL 780-2 belongs to RAL Effect's range, Evergreen Fog is a Sherwin-Williams color. RAL 780-2 reads as beige, while Evergreen Fog reads as green-grey — two distinct hue families, not close cousins. RAL 780-2 (LRV 68) reflects noticeably more light than Evergreen Fog (LRV 30), a difference of 38 points that becomes especially apparent in rooms with limited natural light. With a ΔE of 26.6, the contrast is hard to miss. These aren't variations on a theme — they're two different answers to the same question. Below you'll find 3 real-room photo comparisons where both colors appear side by side, plus 5 simulated room previews.
RAL 780-2 vs Evergreen Fog in Real Spaces
3 real rooms side by side. Seeing RAL 780-2 and Evergreen Fog in actual rooms makes the difference concrete; browse the spaces below to get a feel for how each color lives on a wall.
Living Room
In a living room, color works across both daylight and evening light — the same wall can read very differently at noon and at 8pm. The LRV gap is large enough that RAL 780-2 will make the room feel meaningfully brighter than Evergreen Fog would.
Bathroom
Bathrooms are one of the few spaces where you're genuinely enclosed by the paint color, which makes the choice between these two more consequential. RAL 780-2 reflects noticeably more light off the walls, making the space read more open than Evergreen Fog.
House
Seen across an entire facade, subtle tonal differences become pronounced. What reads as nearly the same on a chip often reads as clearly different at scale. RAL 780-2 reflects noticeably more light off the walls, making the space read more open than Evergreen Fog.
Color Details
RAL 780-2 vs Evergreen Fog Simulated Comparison
5 simulated room previews — drag the slider on each to see RAL 780-2 on one side and Evergreen Fog on the other.
Digital color is approximate. These simulations are generated from the manufacturer's hex values and overlaid on grayscale room photos — your screen's calibration, brightness, and viewing angle all affect how they render. Before committing to either color, test physical samples in your own space under the light you actually live with.
More RAL 780-2 comparisons
See how RAL 780-2 stacks up against other well-photographed colors across different brands and tones.
White Dove reflects far more light (LRV 83 vs 68), opening up a space where RAL 780-2 encloses it.
At LRV 68 vs 52, RAL 780-2 is decisively the brighter choice.
A 8-point LRV gap (68 vs 60) makes RAL 780-2 the marginally brighter of the two.
RAL 780-2 reads slightly lighter (LRV 68 vs 58), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms.
RAL 780-2 reflects far more light (LRV 68 vs 27), opening up a space where Denim Drift encloses it.
At LRV 68 vs 43, RAL 780-2 is decisively the brighter choice.
RAL 780-2 reflects far more light (LRV 68 vs 55), opening up a space where Tranquil Dawn encloses it.
RAL 780-2 reflects far more light (LRV 68 vs 44), opening up a space where Hardwick White encloses it.
At LRV 84 vs 68, Pure White is decisively the brighter choice.
With LRVs of 68 and 66, the two reflect almost the same amount of light.
Shoji White reads slightly lighter (LRV 74 vs 68), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms.
RAL 780-2 reflects far more light (LRV 68 vs 12), opening up a space where Pewter Green encloses it.
With LRVs of 68 and 68, the two reflect almost the same amount of light.
RAL 780-2 reflects far more light (LRV 68 vs 12), opening up a space where Vintage Vogue encloses it.
RAL 780-2 reflects far more light (LRV 68 vs 45), opening up a space where Saybrook Sage encloses it.
At LRV 68 vs 31, RAL 780-2 is decisively the brighter choice.
At LRV 68 vs 7, RAL 780-2 is decisively the brighter choice.
At LRV 68 vs 24, RAL 780-2 is decisively the brighter choice.
A 11-point LRV gap (68 vs 57) makes RAL 780-2 the marginally brighter of the two.
A 4-point LRV gap (72 vs 68) makes Just Walnut the marginally brighter of the two.