Breathtaking vs Eye Catching
Both from Sherwin-Williams's palette. Breathtaking reads as blue, while Eye Catching reads as beige-yellow — two distinct hue families, not close cousins. Breathtaking (LRV 63) reflects noticeably more light than Eye Catching (LRV 50), a difference of 13 points that becomes especially apparent in rooms with limited natural light. Breathtaking runs cool while Eye Catching is decidedly warm, which means they'll respond very differently to warm vs cool light sources. With a ΔE of 76.9, the contrast is hard to miss. These aren't variations on a theme — they're two different answers to the same question. Below, 5 simulated room previews show how each color reads at scale — real-room photos will be added as they become available.
Color Details
Breathtaking vs Eye Catching Simulated Comparison
5 simulated room previews — drag the slider on each to see Breathtaking on one side and Eye Catching on the other.
Digital color is approximate. These simulations are generated from the manufacturer's hex values and overlaid on grayscale room photos — your screen's calibration, brightness, and viewing angle all affect how they render. Before committing to either color, test physical samples in your own space under the light you actually live with.
More Breathtaking comparisons
See how Breathtaking stacks up against other well-photographed colors across different brands and tones.
