
Cascades vs Mount Etna
Cascades and Mount Etna come from the same Sherwin-Williams collection. Cascades reads as blue, while Mount Etna reads as blue-grey — two distinct hue families, not close cousins. Their light reflectance values are nearly the same — 4 vs 6 — so neither will read significantly brighter or darker than the other. Both share a cool character, which means they'll respond to light and surrounding materials in similar ways. ΔE 7.8 means they're clearly different, but not dramatically so — they'd pair well in the same room. Below you'll find 3 real-room photo comparisons where both colors appear side by side, plus 5 simulated room previews.
Cascades vs Mount Etna in Real Spaces
3 real rooms side by side. Cascades and Mount Etna are close enough that the difference can be hard to judge from a chip alone — these photos show how each reads at scale, across different spaces and lighting conditions.
Living Room
A living room wall sees more varied light than almost any other surface in the house, which makes the choice between these two more nuanced than a chip suggests. The distinction reads clearly at room scale, making the choice between them concrete.
Home Office
Home office walls matter more than most — you're looking at them all day, and a color that reads fine at first can become tiring over time. At this scale, the choice between them becomes clear in a way that a swatch alone can't communicate.
Kitchen Cabinets
Cabinet color is always seen in context — against countertops, backsplash, and hardware — which amplifies undertone differences that might disappear on a plain wall. At this scale, the choice between them becomes clear in a way that a swatch alone can't communicate.
Color Details
Cascades vs Mount Etna Simulated Comparison
5 simulated room previews — drag the slider on each to see Cascades on one side and Mount Etna on the other.
Digital color is approximate. These simulations are generated from the manufacturer's hex values and overlaid on grayscale room photos — your screen's calibration, brightness, and viewing angle all affect how they render. Before committing to either color, test physical samples in your own space under the light you actually live with.
More Cascades comparisons
See how Cascades stacks up against other well-photographed colors across different brands and tones.



White Dove reflects far more light (LRV 83 vs 4), opening up a space where Cascades encloses it.



At LRV 52 vs 4, Purbeck Stone is decisively the brighter choice.



At LRV 30 vs 4, Evergreen Fog is decisively the brighter choice.



At LRV 60 vs 4, Agreeable Gray is decisively the brighter choice.



Accessible Beige reflects far more light (LRV 58 vs 4), opening up a space where Cascades encloses it.



Denim Drift reflects far more light (LRV 27 vs 4), opening up a space where Cascades encloses it.



At LRV 43 vs 4, French Gray is decisively the brighter choice.



Tranquil Dawn reflects far more light (LRV 55 vs 4), opening up a space where Cascades encloses it.



Hardwick White reflects far more light (LRV 44 vs 4), opening up a space where Cascades encloses it.



At LRV 84 vs 4, Pure White is decisively the brighter choice.



Balboa Mist reflects far more light (LRV 66 vs 4), opening up a space where Cascades encloses it.



Shoji White reflects far more light (LRV 74 vs 4), opening up a space where Cascades encloses it.



Pewter Green reads slightly lighter (LRV 12 vs 4), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms.



Skimming Stone reflects far more light (LRV 68 vs 4), opening up a space where Cascades encloses it.



Vintage Vogue reads slightly lighter (LRV 12 vs 4), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms.



Saybrook Sage reflects far more light (LRV 45 vs 4), opening up a space where Cascades encloses it.



At LRV 31 vs 4, Pale Green is decisively the brighter choice.



Their light reflectance is nearly identical (LRV 7 vs 4), so neither reads brighter in a room.



At LRV 24 vs 4, Cement grey is decisively the brighter choice.



At LRV 57 vs 4, Guilford Green is decisively the brighter choice.



































