Copen Blue vs Touch of Spring
Where Copen Blue belongs to Sherwin-Williams's range, Touch of Spring is a Valspar color. Hue-wise, Copen Blue belongs to the blue-green family and Touch of Spring to the green-grey family. Touch of Spring (LRV 69) reflects noticeably more light than Copen Blue (LRV 59), a difference of 10 points that becomes especially apparent in rooms with limited natural light. The ΔE 5.4 gap is real but not dramatic — close enough to use together, distinct enough to matter as a choice. Below, 5 simulated room previews show how each color reads at scale — real-room photos will be added as they become available.
Color Details
Copen Blue vs Touch of Spring Simulated Comparison
5 simulated room previews — drag the slider on each to see Copen Blue on one side and Touch of Spring on the other.
Digital color is approximate. These simulations are generated from the manufacturer's hex values and overlaid on grayscale room photos — your screen's calibration, brightness, and viewing angle all affect how they render. Before committing to either color, test physical samples in your own space under the light you actually live with.
More Copen Blue comparisons
See how Copen Blue stacks up against other well-photographed colors across different brands and tones.
Ammonite reads slightly lighter (LRV 69 vs 59), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms.
At LRV 83 vs 59, White Dove is decisively the brighter choice.
At LRV 59 vs 6, Copen Blue is decisively the brighter choice.
Copen Blue reads slightly lighter (LRV 59 vs 52), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms.
Copen Blue reflects far more light (LRV 59 vs 30), opening up a space where Evergreen Fog encloses it.
A 7-point LRV gap (59 vs 52) makes Copen Blue the marginally brighter of the two.
With LRVs of 60 and 59, the two reflect almost the same amount of light.
Their light reflectance is nearly identical (LRV 59 vs 58), so neither reads brighter in a room.
At LRV 59 vs 27, Copen Blue is decisively the brighter choice.
Copen Blue reflects far more light (LRV 59 vs 43), opening up a space where French Gray encloses it.
Copen Blue reflects far more light (LRV 59 vs 4), opening up a space where Naval encloses it.
A 4-point LRV gap (59 vs 55) makes Copen Blue the marginally brighter of the two.
At LRV 59 vs 13, Copen Blue is decisively the brighter choice.
At LRV 59 vs 44, Copen Blue is decisively the brighter choice.
Pure White reflects far more light (LRV 84 vs 59), opening up a space where Copen Blue encloses it.
Copen Blue reflects far more light (LRV 59 vs 21), opening up a space where Artichoke encloses it.
A 7-point LRV gap (66 vs 59) makes Balboa Mist the marginally brighter of the two.
At LRV 74 vs 59, Shoji White is decisively the brighter choice.
At LRV 83 vs 59, Snowbound is decisively the brighter choice.
Copen Blue reads slightly lighter (LRV 59 vs 51), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms.
At LRV 59 vs 12, Copen Blue is decisively the brighter choice.
At LRV 59 vs 8, Copen Blue is decisively the brighter choice.
A 10-point LRV gap (68 vs 59) makes Skimming Stone the marginally brighter of the two.
Copen Blue reflects far more light (LRV 59 vs 41), opening up a space where Dix Blue encloses it.
At LRV 59 vs 12, Copen Blue is decisively the brighter choice.
At LRV 59 vs 45, Copen Blue is decisively the brighter choice.
Copen Blue reflects far more light (LRV 59 vs 31), opening up a space where Pale Green encloses it.