Eye Catching vs Indulgent
Both from Sherwin-Williams's palette. Hue-wise, Eye Catching belongs to the beige-yellow family and Indulgent to the blue family. Eye Catching (LRV 50) reflects noticeably more light than Indulgent (LRV 41), a difference of 9 points that becomes especially apparent in rooms with limited natural light. Eye Catching runs warm while Indulgent is decidedly cool, which means they'll respond very differently to warm vs cool light sources. With a ΔE of 86.9, the contrast is hard to miss. These aren't variations on a theme — they're two different answers to the same question. Below you'll find 10 real-room photo comparisons where both colors appear side by side, plus 5 simulated room previews.
Eye Catching vs Indulgent in Real Spaces
10 real rooms side by side. Seeing Eye Catching and Indulgent in actual rooms makes the difference concrete; browse the spaces below to get a feel for how each color lives on a wall.
Living Room
In a living room, color works across both daylight and evening light — the same wall can read very differently at noon and at 8pm. The LRV gap is large enough that Eye Catching will make the room feel meaningfully brighter than Indulgent would.
Bedroom
The context that matters most in a bedroom is how a color reads under a bedside lamp at night, not under noon daylight. Eye Catching reflects noticeably more light off the walls, making the space read more open than Indulgent.
Kitchen
In a kitchen, colors are seen under bright task lighting that amplifies undertones — what reads neutral elsewhere can show its hand here. Eye Catching reflects noticeably more light off the walls, making the space read more open than Indulgent.
Dining Room
A dining room lit by a dimmed pendant or candles is one of the most forgiving environments for paint — warm light softens almost everything. Eye Catching returns significantly more light to the room — in a smaller or darker space, that difference in perceived brightness is hard to miss.
Bathroom
Bathrooms are one of the few spaces where you're genuinely enclosed by the paint color, which makes the choice between these two more consequential. Eye Catching reflects noticeably more light off the walls, making the space read more open than Indulgent.
Home Office
The test for a home office color isn't how it looks in a quick glance — it's whether it still feels right after a full day of work. Eye Catching reflects noticeably more light off the walls, making the space read more open than Indulgent.
Mudroom
Mudrooms are seen in passing, often under whatever light comes through the door — a context that favors colors with some depth. Eye Catching returns significantly more light to the room — in a smaller or darker space, that difference in perceived brightness is hard to miss.
Patio
Outside, paint color competes with sky, landscaping, and direct sun — all of which shift how both of these read compared to an indoor chip. Eye Catching returns significantly more light to the room — in a smaller or darker space, that difference in perceived brightness is hard to miss.
House
Seen across an entire facade, subtle tonal differences become pronounced. What reads as nearly the same on a chip often reads as clearly different at scale. Eye Catching reflects noticeably more light off the walls, making the space read more open than Indulgent.
Front Door
A front door is a focal point — small color differences read clearly at this concentrated scale. The LRV gap is large enough that Eye Catching will make the room feel meaningfully brighter than Indulgent would.
Color Details
Eye Catching vs Indulgent Simulated Comparison
5 simulated room previews — drag the slider on each to see Eye Catching on one side and Indulgent on the other.
Digital color is approximate. These simulations are generated from the manufacturer's hex values and overlaid on grayscale room photos — your screen's calibration, brightness, and viewing angle all affect how they render. Before committing to either color, test physical samples in your own space under the light you actually live with.
More Eye Catching comparisons
See how Eye Catching stacks up against other well-photographed colors across different brands and tones.
White Dove reflects far more light (LRV 83 vs 50), opening up a space where Eye Catching encloses it.
At LRV 69 vs 50, Ammonite is decisively the brighter choice.
Eye Catching reflects far more light (LRV 50 vs 6), opening up a space where Iron Ore encloses it.
Their light reflectance is nearly identical (LRV 52 vs 50), so neither reads brighter in a room.
At LRV 50 vs 30, Eye Catching is decisively the brighter choice.
With LRVs of 52 and 50, the two reflect almost the same amount of light.
A 10-point LRV gap (60 vs 50) makes Agreeable Gray the marginally brighter of the two.
Accessible Beige reads slightly lighter (LRV 58 vs 50), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms.
Eye Catching reflects far more light (LRV 50 vs 27), opening up a space where Denim Drift encloses it.
A 7-point LRV gap (50 vs 43) makes Eye Catching the marginally brighter of the two.
At LRV 50 vs 4, Eye Catching is decisively the brighter choice.
Tranquil Dawn reads slightly lighter (LRV 55 vs 50), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms.
Eye Catching reflects far more light (LRV 50 vs 13), opening up a space where Bancha encloses it.
Eye Catching reads slightly lighter (LRV 50 vs 44), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms.
At LRV 84 vs 50, Pure White is decisively the brighter choice.
At LRV 50 vs 21, Eye Catching is decisively the brighter choice.
Balboa Mist reflects far more light (LRV 66 vs 50), opening up a space where Eye Catching encloses it.
Shoji White reflects far more light (LRV 74 vs 50), opening up a space where Eye Catching encloses it.
Snowbound reflects far more light (LRV 83 vs 50), opening up a space where Eye Catching encloses it.
Eye Catching reflects far more light (LRV 50 vs 12), opening up a space where Pewter Green encloses it.
Skimming Stone reflects far more light (LRV 68 vs 50), opening up a space where Eye Catching encloses it.
A 9-point LRV gap (50 vs 41) makes Eye Catching the marginally brighter of the two.
At LRV 68 vs 50, Calamine is decisively the brighter choice.
At LRV 50 vs 25, Eye Catching is decisively the brighter choice.
Eye Catching reflects far more light (LRV 50 vs 12), opening up a space where Vintage Vogue encloses it.
Eye Catching reads slightly lighter (LRV 50 vs 45), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms.
At LRV 50 vs 31, Eye Catching is decisively the brighter choice.
At LRV 50 vs 7, Eye Catching is decisively the brighter choice.
At LRV 50 vs 24, Eye Catching is decisively the brighter choice.
A 7-point LRV gap (57 vs 50) makes Guilford Green the marginally brighter of the two.