Hubbard Squash vs Viva Gold
Both from Sherwin-Williams's palette. These are both beiges, so the question isn't which hue to choose — it's where within beige to land. Hubbard Squash (LRV 56) reflects noticeably more light than Viva Gold (LRV 47), a difference of 9 points that becomes especially apparent in rooms with limited natural light. Both lean warm, so they'll behave similarly in mixed or changing light conditions. The ΔE 9.7 gap is real but not dramatic — close enough to use together, distinct enough to matter as a choice. Below, 5 simulated room previews show how each color reads at scale — real-room photos will be added as they become available.
Color Details
Hubbard Squash vs Viva Gold Simulated Comparison
5 simulated room previews — drag the slider on each to see Hubbard Squash on one side and Viva Gold on the other.
Digital color is approximate. These simulations are generated from the manufacturer's hex values and overlaid on grayscale room photos — your screen's calibration, brightness, and viewing angle all affect how they render. Before committing to either color, test physical samples in your own space under the light you actually live with.
More Hubbard Squash comparisons
See how Hubbard Squash stacks up against other well-photographed colors across different brands and tones.
At LRV 83 vs 56, White Dove is decisively the brighter choice.
Ammonite reflects far more light (LRV 69 vs 56), opening up a space where Hubbard Squash encloses it.
At LRV 56 vs 6, Hubbard Squash is decisively the brighter choice.
Hubbard Squash reads slightly lighter (LRV 56 vs 52), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms.
Hubbard Squash reflects far more light (LRV 56 vs 30), opening up a space where Evergreen Fog encloses it.
A 5-point LRV gap (56 vs 52) makes Hubbard Squash the marginally brighter of the two.
Agreeable Gray reads slightly lighter (LRV 60 vs 56), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms.
Their light reflectance is nearly identical (LRV 58 vs 56), so neither reads brighter in a room.
At LRV 56 vs 27, Hubbard Squash is decisively the brighter choice.
Hubbard Squash reflects far more light (LRV 56 vs 43), opening up a space where French Gray encloses it.
Hubbard Squash reflects far more light (LRV 56 vs 4), opening up a space where Naval encloses it.
Their light reflectance is nearly identical (LRV 56 vs 55), so neither reads brighter in a room.
At LRV 56 vs 13, Hubbard Squash is decisively the brighter choice.
At LRV 56 vs 44, Hubbard Squash is decisively the brighter choice.
Pure White reflects far more light (LRV 84 vs 56), opening up a space where Hubbard Squash encloses it.
Hubbard Squash reflects far more light (LRV 56 vs 21), opening up a space where Artichoke encloses it.
A 9-point LRV gap (66 vs 56) makes Balboa Mist the marginally brighter of the two.
At LRV 74 vs 56, Shoji White is decisively the brighter choice.
At LRV 83 vs 56, Snowbound is decisively the brighter choice.
At LRV 56 vs 12, Hubbard Squash is decisively the brighter choice.
A 12-point LRV gap (68 vs 56) makes Skimming Stone the marginally brighter of the two.
Hubbard Squash reflects far more light (LRV 56 vs 41), opening up a space where Dix Blue encloses it.
Calamine reads slightly lighter (LRV 68 vs 56), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms.
Hubbard Squash reflects far more light (LRV 56 vs 25), opening up a space where Treron encloses it.
At LRV 56 vs 12, Hubbard Squash is decisively the brighter choice.
A 11-point LRV gap (56 vs 45) makes Hubbard Squash the marginally brighter of the two.
Hubbard Squash reflects far more light (LRV 56 vs 31), opening up a space where Pale Green encloses it.
Hubbard Squash reflects far more light (LRV 56 vs 7), opening up a space where Pine Needle encloses it.
Hubbard Squash reflects far more light (LRV 56 vs 24), opening up a space where Cement grey encloses it.
With LRVs of 57 and 56, the two reflect almost the same amount of light.