RAL 780-2 vs Echelon Ecru
RAL 780-2 (RAL Effect) and Echelon Ecru (Sherwin-Williams) come from different manufacturers. Both sit in the beige family, which is useful context if you're narrowing within a single hue direction. Their light reflectance values are nearly the same — 68 vs 70 — so neither will read significantly brighter or darker than the other. A ΔE of 1.9 puts them in subtle territory — distinguishable in direct comparison, less so from across a room. Below you'll find 3 real-room photo comparisons where both colors appear side by side, plus 5 simulated room previews.
RAL 780-2 vs Echelon Ecru in Real Spaces
3 real rooms side by side. RAL 780-2 and Echelon Ecru are close enough that the difference can be hard to judge from a chip alone — these photos show how each reads at scale, across different spaces and lighting conditions.
Living Room
A living room wall sees more varied light than almost any other surface in the house, which makes the choice between these two more nuanced than a chip suggests. At this scale the difference is subtle — you'd need them side by side, as shown here, to reliably tell them apart.
Bathroom
Small bathrooms intensify color. A shade that seems quiet in a larger room can feel immersive when you're surrounded by it on four walls. In photos like these you're seeing the difference at its most direct. In a finished room, the distinction is there but not dramatic.
House
A full exterior is the most demanding test for a paint color — scale and outdoor light both amplify differences that seem small on a swatch. In photos like these you're seeing the difference at its most direct. In a finished room, the distinction is there but not dramatic.
Color Details
RAL 780-2 vs Echelon Ecru Simulated Comparison
5 simulated room previews — drag the slider on each to see RAL 780-2 on one side and Echelon Ecru on the other.
Digital color is approximate. These simulations are generated from the manufacturer's hex values and overlaid on grayscale room photos — your screen's calibration, brightness, and viewing angle all affect how they render. Before committing to either color, test physical samples in your own space under the light you actually live with.
More RAL 780-2 comparisons
See how RAL 780-2 stacks up against other well-photographed colors across different brands and tones.
White Dove reflects far more light (LRV 83 vs 68), opening up a space where RAL 780-2 encloses it.
At LRV 68 vs 52, RAL 780-2 is decisively the brighter choice.
At LRV 68 vs 30, RAL 780-2 is decisively the brighter choice.
A 8-point LRV gap (68 vs 60) makes RAL 780-2 the marginally brighter of the two.
RAL 780-2 reads slightly lighter (LRV 68 vs 58), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms.
RAL 780-2 reflects far more light (LRV 68 vs 27), opening up a space where Denim Drift encloses it.
At LRV 68 vs 43, RAL 780-2 is decisively the brighter choice.
RAL 780-2 reflects far more light (LRV 68 vs 55), opening up a space where Tranquil Dawn encloses it.
RAL 780-2 reflects far more light (LRV 68 vs 44), opening up a space where Hardwick White encloses it.
At LRV 84 vs 68, Pure White is decisively the brighter choice.
With LRVs of 68 and 66, the two reflect almost the same amount of light.
Shoji White reads slightly lighter (LRV 74 vs 68), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms.
RAL 780-2 reflects far more light (LRV 68 vs 12), opening up a space where Pewter Green encloses it.
RAL 780-2 reflects far more light (LRV 68 vs 8), opening up a space where Duck Green encloses it.
With LRVs of 68 and 68, the two reflect almost the same amount of light.
RAL 780-2 reflects far more light (LRV 68 vs 12), opening up a space where Vintage Vogue encloses it.
RAL 780-2 reflects far more light (LRV 68 vs 45), opening up a space where Saybrook Sage encloses it.
At LRV 68 vs 31, RAL 780-2 is decisively the brighter choice.