Alabaster vs Forever Lilac
Both from Sherwin-Williams's palette. Alabaster reads as beige-greige, while Forever Lilac reads as blue-purple — two distinct hue families, not close cousins. Alabaster (LRV 82) reflects noticeably more light than Forever Lilac (LRV 40), a difference of 42 points that becomes especially apparent in rooms with limited natural light. Alabaster runs warm while Forever Lilac is decidedly cool, which means they'll respond very differently to warm vs cool light sources. With a ΔE of 33.3, the contrast is hard to miss. These aren't variations on a theme — they're two different answers to the same question. Below you'll find 1 real-room photo comparison where both colors appear side by side, plus 5 simulated room previews.
Alabaster vs Forever Lilac in Real Spaces
1 real room side by side. Seeing Alabaster and Forever Lilac in actual rooms makes the difference concrete; browse the spaces below to get a feel for how each color lives on a wall.
Bedroom
The context that matters most in a bedroom is how a color reads under a bedside lamp at night, not under noon daylight. Alabaster reflects noticeably more light off the walls, making the space read more open than Forever Lilac.
Color Details
Alabaster vs Forever Lilac Simulated Comparison
5 simulated room previews — drag the slider on each to see Alabaster on one side and Forever Lilac on the other.
Digital color is approximate. These simulations are generated from the manufacturer's hex values and overlaid on grayscale room photos — your screen's calibration, brightness, and viewing angle all affect how they render. Before committing to either color, test physical samples in your own space under the light you actually live with.
More Alabaster comparisons
See how Alabaster stacks up against other well-photographed colors across different brands and tones.
